What is the most ridiculous modern propaganda you have ever seen til today?

Trump is an outsider and wants to help the average American out.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: makemap

The way Donald Trump has been treated is eerily similiar to the treatment of Emanuel Goldstein by Big Brother.

That's the problem, Trump hasn't been treated, but he sure needs some.
Besides, Trump is in relationship with the likes of Soros and the Rothschild's, he even has Soros/Rothschild people in his admin, but try telling that to his gombeen supporters.

a reply to: makemap

Freedom Fries, Patriot Act, or anything with the prefix of "freedom" or "patriot", used to fishhook all the pseudo-Jingoists too scared to question their own logic.

I'm surprised Trump didn't call it the "Freedom Wall". I think it might have been too ironic even for him.

a reply to: makemap
Some absurd propaganda was put out by the opponents of the tax ("community charge") which Maggie Thatcher placed on individuals.
It was nicknamed the "poll tax", a name with historical roots. "Poll" = "head"- effectively, a "head tax".
The opponents seized on this nickname and tried to associate the tax with the act of voting. They made two parallel claims, both untrue;
1) Anyone who did not pay the tax would not be allowed to vote.
2) Anyone who took their names off the electoral register would be exempt from paying.
There were many believers in the second line who did "de-register" themselves, and thus made the first line come true entirely by their own act. If there is any poetic justice, this will have been one of the reasons why the government won the next election.

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: makemap

The way Donald Trump has been treated is eerily similiar to the treatment of Emanuel Goldstein by Big Brother.

That's the problem, Trump hasn't been treated, but he sure needs some.

Besides, Trump is in relationship with the likes of Soros and the Rothschild's, he even has Soros/Rothschild people in his admin, but try telling that to his gombeen supporters.

I think the real question is, do you believe that because of propaganda or because you know the man, his intentions, and his dealings? I suspect the former.

originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: makemap
Some absurd propaganda was put out by the opponents of the tax ("community charge") which Maggie Thatcher placed on individuals.
It was nicknamed the "poll tax", a name with historical roots. "Poll" = "head"- effectively, a "head tax".
The opponents seized on this nickname and tried to associate the tax with the act of voting. They made two parallel claims, both untrue;
1) Anyone who did not pay the tax would not be allowed to vote.
2) Anyone who took their names off the electoral register would be exempt from paying.
There were many believers in the second line who did "de-register" themselves, and thus made the first line come true entirely by their own act. If there is any poetic justice, this will have been one of the reasons why the government won the next election.

That's a great one. Thanks for pointing it out.

a reply to: makemap

Believing in the Constitution of the United States of America means you are a Fascist?

a reply to: makemap

Beyonce at the grammys. She isn't the first woman to have a baby, she definitely ain't no virgin. She played off "the Madonna" thing with child, had the 12 chairs around the big table with 12 dancing bitches, I guess that was supposed to be a mock last suppa. Of course she also had the star of Bethlehem thing going on. She was dressed to look like a representation of Columbia or Isis, virgin (lol) birth and all (more lol) with halos around her and her 12 disciples heads.

Whole thing was absolutely ridiculous and looked more like a ritual meant to perpetuate her IMHO mkultra programming. Sad, stupid person, needs meds or some kind of help. What's worse is how the Grammy organizers could let this crap on TV, but since it appeared to be an ideological and psychological steering piece, falls under propaganda for me.

Cheers - Dave

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: makemap

The way Donald Trump has been treated is eerily similiar to the treatment of Emanuel Goldstein by Big Brother.

That's the problem, Trump hasn't been treated, but he sure needs some.

Besides, Trump is in relationship with the likes of Soros and the Rothschild's, he even has Soros/Rothschild people in his admin, but try telling that to his gombeen supporters.

I think the real question is, do you believe that because of propaganda or because you know the man, his intentions, and his dealings? I suspect the former.

What propaganda is that? are you sure you don't mean stuff about Trump that has been written years ago.
Of course there is plenty of propaganda about now, it never ceases, Spicer..meet the press, Kellyanne...alternative facts, Pfff.

Pharmaceutical Commercials

What is the most ridiculous modern propaganda you have ever seen til today?

The Clinton presidential campaign.

originally posted by: 123143

What is the most ridiculous modern propaganda you have ever seen til today?

The Clinton presidential campaign.

Oh deal lord.

News today talked about a third run.

a reply to: neo96

No way. All the performance enhancing steroid drugs she had to take for this last one, her nuts are probably already shrunken the size of BB's.

Build up to Iraq
Russians hacking Clinton
BLM
everything centered around the Israel / Palestine genocide

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: neo96

No way. All the performance enhancing steroid drugs she had to take for this last one, her nuts are probably already shrunken the size of BB's.

hotair.com...

www.nytimes.com...

Don't be surprised.

a reply to: makemap

I'm torn between the Global Warming hoax and the media and public reaction to the death of Osama bin Laden despite there being ZERO evidence that the man was killed in that raid (or even that he was present at the raid).

"CNN - The most trusted name in news."

originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: makemap
Some absurd propaganda was put out by the opponents of the tax ("community charge") which Maggie Thatcher placed on individuals.
It was nicknamed the "poll tax", a name with historical roots. "Poll" = "head"- effectively, a "head tax".
The opponents seized on this nickname and tried to associate the tax with the act of voting. They made two parallel claims, both untrue;
1) Anyone who did not pay the tax would not be allowed to vote.
2) Anyone who took their names off the electoral register would be exempt from paying.
There were many believers in the second line who did "de-register" themselves, and thus made the first line come true entirely by their own act. If there is any poetic justice, this will have been one of the reasons why the government won the next election.

Still and all, it was the end of Maggie, 'night of the long swords' and John Major took over, and I might add Maggie deserved it because the poll tax was designed to cut high spending Labour councils. What she didn't realise until too late was that it was that many conservative people rebelled, and for good reason.
The pay to vote poll tax was one requirement at least in one other implemetations of the idea historically, and in the US it was used to disenfrachise poor white Americans, and even more so black Americans, who also needed to have literacy tests, and woe betide them if the did pass those tests...despite what the constitution said. So nothing to crow poetic justice about.

This

The clip of Jeremy Glick being berated by Bill O Reilly for questioning 9/11.

The clip from BBC where a newsreader asked a kid with cerebral palsy that was beaten with truncheons and dragged from his wheelchair during a student protest if he'd aggressively wheeled himself at cops then went on to attempt to paint him as a violent extremist.

The whole initial buildup to the Syrian conflict where mainstream news in Britain became an overt recruiting commerical for any muslim with a conscience to want to go fight Assad due to the daily reportage of atrocities committed against innocent civilians by the Assad regime. Then when they actually did go to fight but the Cameron govt was blocked from initiating a full scale ground war it all conveniently disappeared, the reporting stopped and anybody who went to fight was painted as a terrorist.