It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The presidential order, she said, “has all kinds of defects” and “clearly is overreaching” when it comes to long-term residents of the United States. The White House has issued guidance that those residents are exempt from the ban, but that language is not actually in the order.
originally posted by: Phage
Federal judge Leonie M. Brinkema has requested that the Government provide evidence that Trump's travel ban was necessary. She's not just any judge. She happens to be the judge who sentenced Zacarias Moussaoui to life imprisonment saying, "You came here to be a martyr and to die in a great big bang of glory, but to paraphrase the poet T. S. Eliot, instead, you will die with a whimper. The rest of your life you will spend in prison."
The presidential order, she said, “has all kinds of defects” and “clearly is overreaching” when it comes to long-term residents of the United States. The White House has issued guidance that those residents are exempt from the ban, but that language is not actually in the order.
source
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Phage
I am sure that the judge will be invited to the presidents national security briefings and will seat in congress to help make and change laws.
What a joke this judges are becoming.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Snarl
One who clearly holds no truck with terrorists.
Yet another who sees that the EO is problematic on legal grounds.
originally posted by: randomthoughts12
a reply to: Phage
I am searching now I thought I saw it on ATS. A blonde lady interviewing a white older guy with glasses saying the White house gave them this list. It baffled me as to why I asked what you took of it.
Ok well the ATS article is gone as to my history and the embedded video I can't find yet.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Phage
The answer "National Security" to that question has NEVER been questioned by any judge at the federal level in the history of this country... the fact that it now being questioned shows exactly what type of scum we presently have sitting on the benches.
originally posted by: introvert
A joke because her rulings or opinions do not coincide with your political bias?
I would think we'd invite checks and balances to keep our elected officials from abusing power or acting without just cause.
Seems to me that process is now considered a liberal bias.
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Phage
The answer "National Security" to that question has NEVER been questioned by any judge at the federal level in the history of this country... the fact that it now being questioned shows exactly what type of scum we presently have sitting on the benches.
Screw the law, it's about political ideology and feelings!
80% of the 9th circuit has been overturned by the supreme court! Anyone else see a problem but me?
Time to arrest those whom have taken an oath to uphold the law, yet choose to allow their "feelings" to supersede the oath they took!