It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: queenofswords
It is always about money, always.
7 sewing machines were provided, 30+ women were taught sewing,
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: intrptr
If a female candidate is the best person for the job, I am all over that vote.
But to vote for her just cause she can make babies---nope.
originally posted by: jellyrev
a reply to: Fowlerstoad
hillary could actually help women by opening a womens school for trades, engineering, and computer science.
Saying to be "Bold" does nothing in reality.
originally posted by: VegHead
As a woman, this is so cringey. The future is female? Wow, that's not only sexist but completely disregarding our mothers and grandmothers in past generations.
I don't care if my "leader" is male or female, just that they are competent, wise, and moral. This new femininism is not only offensively sexist, it acts as if things are really really bad right now for women. Talk about a total disregard for history and a total disregard for understanding other world cultures. Western women today are doing fine. It is so insulting to act as if we are some sort of oppressed class.
Also... has it become politically incorrect to point out that men and women are different? We tend to take different roles in society because we ARE different.
OK... rant over.
ETA (I guess my rant wasn't over)... Cutesy alliteration doesn't make a statement true.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: seasonal
If we are to look only to a candidate's sex organs to determine what and who the future is, we may very well end up with an dithering, unvetted person who can't lead a nation (again).
Where in the video does she say that we should "only look to a candidate's sex organs to determine what and who the future is?"
I know color and sex is more important to liberals.
Well that certainly explains your consternation over the innocuous statements made in this video. Here on ATS there are dozens of threads a week from conservatives whining about some issue involving race, gender, etc. How many threads from the liberal posters about the same?
American conservativism is quickly devolving into a platform of whining about how put upon white people are, white males in particular and Christians and heterosexuals more generally. Once you've turned yourself into the ultimate PC-victim, you can blather about how put up with it you are and how you're not going to take it anymore yadda yadda "take our country back" blah blah blah "this is why Trump won bro! This is why!"
If you found what Clinton said in that video somehow threatening, I'd suggest that maybe you need to grow a pair, snowflake.
originally posted by: digital01anarchy
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: seasonal
If we are to look only to a candidate's sex organs to determine what and who the future is, we may very well end up with an dithering, unvetted person who can't lead a nation (again).
Where in the video does she say that we should "only look to a candidate's sex organs to determine what and who the future is?"
I know color and sex is more important to liberals.
Well that certainly explains your consternation over the innocuous statements made in this video. Here on ATS there are dozens of threads a week from conservatives whining about some issue involving race, gender, etc. How many threads from the liberal posters about the same?
American conservativism is quickly devolving into a platform of whining about how put upon white people are, white males in particular and Christians and heterosexuals more generally. Once you've turned yourself into the ultimate PC-victim, you can blather about how put up with it you are and how you're not going to take it anymore yadda yadda "take our country back" blah blah blah "this is why Trump won bro! This is why!"
If you found what Clinton said in that video somehow threatening, I'd suggest that maybe you need to grow a pair, snowflake.
Lol anti you say the same thing in every thread now. The conservatives are now the snow flakes. No i dont see what you are saying we are basically trying to fix the damage liberals have done to the country. I'm sure you would love for us to beat the living hell out of antifas protestors so your victim status is restored. The point is we are in control now and you can pretend to be the alphamales or females and dress up in all black, mace unsuspecting females in the face and punch people in the back of their heads when their backs are turned it wont make you alpha. Liberals are filled with beta newmale clucks not all liberals are but the ones pretending to be hard are. We know the objective is to have us push back and eventually it will happen but it will happen after the dems have lost everyone in the middle politically. Our objective is to allow you fools to make mistakes and build on destroying your political party through informing the public which requires a stance of non intervention when your side chimps out. When that happens your side loses middle ground.
originally posted by: Ohanka
originally posted by: digital01anarchy
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: seasonal
If we are to look only to a candidate's sex organs to determine what and who the future is, we may very well end up with an dithering, unvetted person who can't lead a nation (again).
Where in the video does she say that we should "only look to a candidate's sex organs to determine what and who the future is?"
I know color and sex is more important to liberals.
Well that certainly explains your consternation over the innocuous statements made in this video. Here on ATS there are dozens of threads a week from conservatives whining about some issue involving race, gender, etc. How many threads from the liberal posters about the same?
American conservativism is quickly devolving into a platform of whining about how put upon white people are, white males in particular and Christians and heterosexuals more generally. Once you've turned yourself into the ultimate PC-victim, you can blather about how put up with it you are and how you're not going to take it anymore yadda yadda "take our country back" blah blah blah "this is why Trump won bro! This is why!"
If you found what Clinton said in that video somehow threatening, I'd suggest that maybe you need to grow a pair, snowflake.
Lol anti you say the same thing in every thread now. The conservatives are now the snow flakes. No i dont see what you are saying we are basically trying to fix the damage liberals have done to the country. I'm sure you would love for us to beat the living hell out of antifas protestors so your victim status is restored. The point is we are in control now and you can pretend to be the alphamales or females and dress up in all black, mace unsuspecting females in the face and punch people in the back of their heads when their backs are turned it wont make you alpha. Liberals are filled with beta newmale clucks not all liberals are but the ones pretending to be hard are. We know the objective is to have us push back and eventually it will happen but it will happen after the dems have lost everyone in the middle politically. Our objective is to allow you fools to make mistakes and build on destroying your political party through informing the public which requires a stance of non intervention when your side chimps out. When that happens your side loses middle ground.
#Triggered