It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: abe froman
All of these so-called "relics" are hoaxes and fakes.
Just like the churches that push them.
originally posted by: abe froman
All of these so-called "relics" are hoaxes and fakes.
Just like the churches that push them.
None of these items have been verified of their authenticity, nor could they be ever be verified. There are 1000's of items that people claim are holy relics and multiples of each. The truth is that there is very much at stake and false claims abound. Not to mention a monetary value ascribed to any item thought to be legitimate. This has brought about countless forgeries. So many, that it would be impossible to distinguish a real relic from a cleverly crafted fake.
originally posted by: The angel of light
The peace of God to all that belong to the light,
Dear readers
Since the night of times humanity has needed to find answers to transcendental questions or solution to problems that the science of the moment is unable to solve.
That is precisely what gives sense to the unfolding of the great religious, spiritual and philosophical traditions of the world.
Now many times beyond its efficacy or beauty faith that is an essential human emotion, although very abstract, needs to have a concrete material support.
A system of ideas to explain the world looks empty when is lacking of substantial historic and concrete tangible matter.
This is the role of The Holy relics, pieces of material reality that still exist and place above any reasonable doubt the point of entering into our time space dimension figures that have leaded humanity in its search for the absolute.
Do you know how many pieces of material reality from the pass for this world of Jeshua Bar Josef, the historic Jesus Christ have arrived to our time?
Well we have quite a few:
- Mary’s robe from the night on which Jesus was born,
- Christ’s swaddling clothes, which his mother used to protect the baby,
- The cloth in which John the Baptist's head was kept after he was beheaded,
- Jesus' loin cloth which he wore on the cross,
- the Holy Sudarium at Oviedo, ysed to clean his face whe descending his corpse from the cross.
- The Holy veil of his mother Mary,
- The Holy seemles Tunic of Christ at Tiers,
- The holy Cap of Jesus at Kahors,
- The Holy coat worn by Christ at Argenteuil,
- The famous Christ Shroud at Turin, that in 2013 was finally dated to the first century.
All these precious Archaeological objects are preserved, catalogued and also enough certified by different records of their origin and way they were gradually collected.
Please check:
sites.tufts.edu...
This thread is about how to test the historicity of a major character of civilization not just from what secular or religious records say if him, but from what he once used, touched, or worn.
Thanks
The Angel of Lightness
Why must we hate christ if we simply are skeptical of the authenticity of your claims? We couldn't possibly be decent human beings if we disagree with you right? This is the clearest tale of a dogmatic fundementalist. You believe that everything brought before you that bolsters your beliefs must be true, and anyone who disagrees must be an evil and cruel miscreant.
originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: abe froman
That is not estsblished, is a common attack from people that usually hate either Christ himself, like the modern atheist fundamentalists, or the ones that hate the connection of Christ with religious organizations that are linked with him through an Apostolic tradition of centuries.
Now, some of these Relics hsve been kept even in secular institutes like the National museum of Austria that preserves the destinity Speer used to confirm the death of Jesus, or the Savoy palaces in Italy that kept the Shroud before King Vitorio Emanuel II donated it to the Cathedral of Turin.
There is another garment of Christ that was brought to Russis. Where was divided in three pieces that today are stored in three Orthodox Cathedrals at Moscow, St Petersburg and Kiev.
The Angel of Lightness
originally posted by: The angel of light
Now, some of these Relics hsve been kept even in secular institutes like the National museum of Austria that preserves the destinity Speer used to confirm the death of Jesus,
The Holy Lance in Rome is preserved beneath the dome of Saint Peter's Basilica
Echmiadzin
The Holy Lance in Echmiadzin
A Holy Lance is conserved in Vagharshapat (previously known as Echmiadzin), the religious capital of Armenia. It was previously held in the monastery of Geghard. The first source that mentions it is a text Holy Relics of Our Lord Jesus Christ, in a thirteenth-century Armenian manuscript. According to this text, the spear which pierced Jesus was to have been brought to Armenia by the Apostle Thaddeus.
During the June 1098 Siege of Antioch, a poor monk named Peter Bartholomew reported that he had a vision in which St. Andrew told him that the Holy Lance was buried in the Church of St. Peter in Antioch. After much digging in the cathedral, Peter apparently discovered a lance.
It is literally impossible to prove a negative. I'm sure you have heard this a million times, which begs the question, why does it keep being brought up as if the skeptic has the burden to prove and the maker of the claim has no obligation to prove what they say? Shall i accuse you of murder and lay the obligation to prove you are not, on your shoulders?
originally posted by: LABTECH767
originally posted by: abe froman
All of these so-called "relics" are hoaxes and fakes.
Just like the churches that push them.
Prove it, especially PROVE not suggest but PROVE if you can and you know you can not prove it that the Shroud is fake.
It is real.
But come on let's see YOUR proof, YOUR undeniable and irrefutable proof.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
It is literally impossible to prove a negative. I'm sure you have heard this a million times, which begs the question, why does it keep being brought up as if the skeptic has the burden to prove and the maker of the claim has no obligation to prove what they say? Shall i accuse you of murder and lay the obligation to prove you are not, on your shoulders?
originally posted by: LABTECH767
originally posted by: abe froman
All of these so-called "relics" are hoaxes and fakes.
Just like the churches that push them.
Prove it, especially PROVE not suggest but PROVE if you can and you know you can not prove it that the Shroud is fake.
It is real.
But come on let's see YOUR proof, YOUR undeniable and irrefutable proof.