US reverses travel ban over court ruling as Trump fumes

Arguing a Draconian law using twitter as an RFC channel.
Interesting, have we thoroughly vetted the judge proposing the compromise legislation?

The truly educated see the MSM smear campaign for what it is, what I dont understand is how anyone on ATS or any similar type discussion forum cant see it or accept it as it suits their agenda.

I don't get this either. I can only come up with a few reasons and that is; they're being paid, they actually believe what they're being fed or they're just incredibly ignorant. For what it's worth, I'm fairly certain a few here don't believe a damn thing they're writing.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: IkNOwSTuff

I think you made a pretty specific claim:

I dont think he cared about the numbers (highest TV ratings for an inauguration by miles) and was more concerned about the lies.

They push the whole "there was no one there, everyone stayed away to protest".
This narrative implies the majority disapprove of Trump due to the fact his inauguration numbers were down vs Obama.
This is the biased against Trump narrative.

I have no doubt Obama had more at his inauguration but he also had less Soros funded activist groups protesting him and assaulting his supporters.

A balanced journalistic view when looking at crowd numbers would also mention the fact it was the most watched inauguration in history by a mile.
This should have gotten a mention in the MSM instead we have to hear about it from a Trump tweet.

Its not the numbers thats important its the complete lack of impartiality in media reporting he was highlighting, he was not having a pissing contest about numbers like all of you anti Trump drones seem to think

P.s he had the highest ever TV audience despite it not being the star studded extravaganza that the inauguration usually is.
I wonder how many people usually tune in just to watch Beyonce or Kelly Clarkson as opposed to the POTUS?
Cant say that happened with the Trump Inaug

originally posted by: Cauliflower
have we thoroughly vetted the judge proposing the compromise legislation?

Has Trump been thoroughly vetted?
Where is his long and short form BC's? What is he hiding?
Why has he sealed his records exactly the same way Obama did?

originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
I have no doubt Obama had more at his inauguration

Oh dear, do not let Trump hear you say that, as Trump would tell you that you were just using "alternative facts"!

Remember what Trump's press secretary claimed....

Sean Spicer’s angry insistence that Donald Trump drew “the largest audience ever to witness an inauguration, period, both in person and around the globe”.

President Trump should quit fighting. Let the travel ban end. Allow everyone to come to America and roam freely after being screened/vetted properly. If they cannot be screened/vetted properly in a reasonable amount of time, send them back. (Its OK to use my tax dollars)

Donald Trump should return to focusing on items that average men/women want, in order to live improved lives. The travel ban was severe overkill.. just like Obama did with the Affordable Care Act.

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
I have no doubt Obama had more at his inauguration

Oh dear, do not let Trump hear you say that, as Trump would tell you that you were just using "alternative facts"!

Remember what Trump's press secretary claimed....

Sean Spicer’s angry insistence that Donald Trump drew “the largest audience ever to witness an inauguration, period, both in person and around the globe”.

Thats true???

Hes obviously including TV in that and its UNDISPUTED that Trump had the largest ever watched inauguration, not the most attended, the most watched.

Thats an undeniable FACT and 100% TRUTHFUL, Not half truths to fit agendas just the FACTS

a reply to: IkNOwSTuff

Hes obviously including TV in that and its UNDISPUTED that Trump had the largest ever watched inauguration, not the most attended, the most watched.

Citation required.
I don't know anyone who watched it. Yes, I know that is anecdotal.

originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
not the most attended, the most watched.

You missed when Spicer claimed...

“the largest audience ever to witness an inauguration, period, both in person

It was NOT the most in person.... but as we clearly Trump and his little trumpets cannot handle the truth!

originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
They push the whole "there was no one there, everyone stayed away to protest".
This narrative implies the majority disapprove of Trump due to the fact his inauguration numbers were down vs Obama.
This is the biased against Trump narrative.

Nobody said that. You are making things up.

Nobody cared that the numbers were lower. It wouldn't even have been a thing if "somebody" didn't make it a thing.

a reply to: hellobruce

The full quote is:

This was the largest audience ever to witness an inauguration, period, both in person and around the globe

a reply to: daskakik

Actually, the media was making it a thing.
They were intentionally trying to make it seem like no one supported Trump enough to show up.
They lied. They even used a picture of the crowd early in the day before most of the crowd arrived.
So the White House had a right to counter that lie with the truth.

a reply to: BlueAjah

In the end nobody really cared as much as the person who was triggered.

ETA No one is a lie. Nobody said that.

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
not the most attended, the most watched.

You missed when Spicer claimed...

“the largest audience ever to witness an inauguration, period, both in person

It was NOT the most in person.... but as we clearly Trump and his little trumpets cannot handle the truth!

Ahh yes, Semantics

I notice you leave out the last part of the quote which is a common tactic used against Trump, just include his words that reinforce your beliefs/agenda.
Its kind of symbolic of all anti Trump rhetoric, you pick and choose the bits and pieces that can be turned into juicy soundbites and then despite the context or reality behind it you all just keep bleating it to yourselves in one big massive SJW/deluded anti Trump circle jerking echo chamber.

To me it was quite clear that when he said "both in person and worldwide" he was referring to them combined and not separately.

Can you show me other than this misinterpretation on your behalf where any one of Trumps people or Trump himself said that there were more people at his inauguration than at Obamas?
You wont be able to find it because other than the above all people have said was that the MSM mislead people as to the actual number

Anybody who thinks this means it has gone away is probably mistaken...

When it comes back now it will be done so with greater permanence...

originally posted by: 5StarOracle
Anybody who thinks this means it has gone away is probably mistaken...

When it comes back now it will be done so with greater permanence...

The existing laws will be enforced also (probably are by now).

That's what many people are missing.

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Cauliflower
have we thoroughly vetted the judge proposing the compromise legislation?

Has Trump been thoroughly vetted?
Where is his long and short form BC's? What is he hiding?
Why has he sealed his records exactly the same way Obama did?

You can always put in a FOIA request.

It's easy to do.

originally posted by: hellobruce

You missed when Spicer claimed...

“the largest audience ever to witness an inauguration, period, both in person

It was NOT the most in person.... but as we clearly Trump and his little trumpets cannot handle the truth!

Your quote is from a MSM lie.

a reply to: IkNOwSTuff

BS. That is the apologist tactic. To always interpret things so that they fit. Besides the MSM was commenting specifically about those that showed up. They were not lying. Why the need to make a thing of it?

originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
This narrative implies the majority disapprove of Trump...

Well, Trump lost the popularity contest. A majority of American disapprove of him and his presidency as evidenced by the election.