It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An act relating to children and youth.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 18, as introduced, Pan. Bill of Rights for Children and Youth in California.
Existing law provides for the care and welfare of children and youth in various contexts, including, but not limited to, child welfare services, foster care, health care, nutrition, homeless assistance, and education.
Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 80 (Res. Ch. 101, Stats. 2009) declares the Legislature’s support of a Bill of Rights for the Children and Youth of California that resolves to invest in all children and youth in order to achieve specified goals to create an optimal environment for their healthy development.
This bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to expand and codify the Bill of Rights for Children and Youth of California to establish a comprehensive framework that governs the rights of all children and youth in California, outlines the research-based essential needs of California’s children, and establishes standards relating to the health, safety, well-being, early childhood and educational opportunities, and familial supports necessary for all children to succeed. The bill would declare the intent of the Legislature, by January 1, 2022, to enact legislation for the purpose of ensuring that the Bill of Rights for Children and Youth of California, in its totality, is applied evenly, equitably, and appropriately to all children and youth across the state.
...
In the proposed bill, there is a group that is referred to as the Peninsula Partnership Leadership Council, hidden under the guise of “Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 80.”
The Peninsula Partnership Leadership Council (PPLC) is composed of the San Mateo County Superintendent of Schools, the County Board of Supervisors and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation.
It’s a non-profit that has assets of $7.3 BILLION. It runs 1800 philanthropic funds. Here are some of its corporate partners:
Alexza Pharmaceuticals. Microsoft. Pepsico Foundation. Cisco. Hewlett Packard. Dell. Symantec. Unilever. Plus something called the SV2 Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund, “building and scaling social inventions.”
(1) The right to parents, guardians, or caregivers who act in their best interest.
(2) The right to form healthy attachments with adults responsible for their care and well-being.
(3) The right to live in a safe and healthy environment.
(4) The right to social and emotional well-being.
(5) The right to opportunities to attain optimal cognitive, physical, and social development.
(6) The right to appropriate, quality education and life skills leading to self-sufficiency in adulthood.
(7) The right to appropriate, quality health care.
False. And you know that SB-277 passed, right?
tried to make vaccines for children mandatory without the consent of parents.
No it won't.
But now, by the introduction of this new bill by senator Pan, and if it passes, the state will be in charge of all children and minors in the state of California, even if these children and minors have parents or legal guardians who are taking good care of them.
Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate
thereof concurring, That the Legislature supports a Bill of Rights
for the Children and Youth of California that resolves to invest in
all children and youth so that the following goals may be achieved:
(1) They have healthy minds, bodies, and spirits that enable
them to maximize their potential.
(2) They each develop a healthy attachment to a parent,
guardian, or caregiver, and an ongoing relationship with a caring
and supportive adult.
(3) Their essential needs are met, including, but not limited to,
nutritious food, shelter, clothing, health care, and accessible
transportation.
(4) They have safe and healthy environments, including, but
not limited to, homes, schools, neighborhoods, and communities.
(5) They have access to a 21st century education that promotes
success in life, in future careers, and a love of lifelong learning.
(6) They have training in life skills that will prepare them to
live independently, be self-sufficient, and contribute to their
community.
(7) They have employment opportunities with protections from
unfair labor practices.
(8) They have freedom from mistreatment, abuse, and neglect.
(9) They have a voice in matters that affect them.
(10) They have a sense of hope for their future; and be it further
Resolved,
That the Legislature desires that every child and youth
in this state should have the opportunities set forth in the Bill of
Rights for the Children and Youth of California; and be it further
Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
From your link:
(1) The right to parents, guardians, or caregivers who act in their best interest.
(2) The right to form healthy attachments with adults responsible for their care and well-being.
(3) The right to live in a safe and healthy environment.
(4) The right to social and emotional well-being.
(5) The right to opportunities to attain optimal cognitive, physical, and social development.
(6) The right to appropriate, quality education and life skills leading to self-sufficiency in adulthood.
(7) The right to appropriate, quality health care.
So you're saying you DON"T think children deserve these rights. Gotcha.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
So, you do want for the state to dictate everything for children and adults even if they do have good parents... Gotcha...
originally posted by: Phage
False. And you know that SB-277 passed, right?
originally posted by: Phage
No it won't.
And, in case anyone is interested, here is the original Resolution.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: kaylaluv
There are already laws that cover everything you mention. But hey, I guess you believe that "Alexza Pharmaceuticals. Microsoft. Pepsico Foundation. Cisco. Hewlett Packard. Dell. Symantec. Unilever. Plus something called the SV2 Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund, “building and scaling social inventions” and "the state" of course know better what's for "the good of children."
originally posted by: kaylaluv
Fear mongering. No one is going to take the kids away from parents who are giving their kids access to healthy food, proper education, proper medical care and a safe, nurturing environment.
Nothing in the law says children can be vaccinated without parental consent.
That bill "sb-277" made it so the parents couldn't object to vaccinations except for medical reasons
originally posted by: Phage
Nothing in the law says children can be vaccinated without parental consent.
This bill comes from the same senator who tried to make vaccines for children mandatory without the consent of parents.
False.
but the state of California now overules parents decisions?.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
Nothing in the law says children can be vaccinated without parental consent.
That bill "sb-277" made it so the parents couldn't object to vaccinations except for medical reasons
Do all private schools in California require vaccination? But you're right, it is the parent's choice. Parents have to make lots of choices.
No, but what it DOES however is deny children an education (aside from home schooling), if parents choose not to vaccinate their children.