It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: havok
The thing with the individual mandate is that it was required to cover the preexisting condition clause. As for the affordability, there are plenty of people saying that premiums went up less with the ACA than they would have without it.
Is the thing perfect? No. But it's definitely better than what we had.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: jjkenobi
2000% where was that? The highest increase I could find was 50% in private and 25% for obamacare. They were increasing before 2014 by about 15-20% and the deductible. That did not include the pre existing waiver and a free yearly doctor visit, of course.
PHOENIX — Arizona was shaping up to be one of the more unlikely battlegrounds of the 2016 campaign when a political bombshell appeared to explode last week: The Obama administration revealed that the cost of midlevel plans on the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance marketplace here would increase next year by 116 percent on average.
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: angeldoll
Hey..how about folks go get a job and pay for their own #?
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: network dude
I've got a mid-grade plan with a very reasonable deductible and I pay $270/mo. And I have a preexisting condition. So if we're using anecdotes as proof for the ACA's quality, then yes it is better than what we had before.
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: jjkenobi
2000% where was that? The highest increase I could find was 50% in private and 25% for obamacare. They were increasing before 2014 by about 15-20% and the deductible. That did not include the pre existing waiver and a free yearly doctor visit, of course.
Tell that to the people in Arizona that work and can't afford insurance because they have to subsidize everyone else's.
PHOENIX — Arizona was shaping up to be one of the more unlikely battlegrounds of the 2016 campaign when a political bombshell appeared to explode last week: The Obama administration revealed that the cost of midlevel plans on the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance marketplace here would increase next year by 116 percent on average.
NYTimes
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: havok
The thing with the individual mandate is that it was required to cover the preexisting condition clause. As for the affordability, there are plenty of people saying that premiums went up less with the ACA than they would have without it.
Is the thing perfect? No. But it's definitely better than what we had.
originally posted by: havok
My entire problem with the ACA is the lack of affordability and the "tax" that it is.
It's not "affordable" by any means, and to mandate it as a tax is abhorrent.
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: havok
My entire problem with the ACA is the lack of affordability and the "tax" that it is.
It's not "affordable" by any means, and to mandate it as a tax is abhorrent.
It's unaffordable in states like Texas where the governor declared that "nope, no way" was he going to participate or allow federal money (which would have subsidized people like a number of friends who are scraping by on minimum wage jobs because that's all there is.)
Friends in states where the government subsidies were accepted tell a different story.