It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: PlasticWizard
I find it odd that if Seth Rich wasn't the leaker, then why did wikileaks post a reward for information on who killed him. Wikileaks made a big deal about Seth.. Why would they do that for just some random dnc guy who got "robbed"(nothing taken) / shot in the back.
originally posted by: PlasticWizard
I find it odd that if Seth Rich wasn't the leaker, then why did wikileaks post a reward for information on who killed him. Wikileaks made a big deal about Seth.. Why would they do that for just some random dnc guy who got "robbed"(nothing taken) / shot in the back.
originally posted by: lordcomac
Nobody talks about him because he was executed for what he did.
Dead men tell no tales- that's why the clintons have left a whole wake of bodies behind them on their trail of glory.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: galien8
Unfortunately, Seth's parents have decided he couldn't have possibly been the leak. They are sticking to the attempted robbery story.
They are never going to get answers by selectively looking under stones.
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: flyingdutchman2112
I suppose it would depend upon the robber...
Shoot someone, realize just what it is you've done, panic...run away.
As for why it's been "forgotten"...? It directly contradicts the established narrative. The Russians Did It, Dammit!