Porn is a Public Health Hazard.... Here we go... again!!

originally posted by: ugmold
a reply to: dawnstar
Maybe he should look into why there is SO MUCH FREE PORN. Like why is that?

Welcome to the age of Digital Media. Same thing happened to all media once we were able to digitize it. It becomes super cheap or even free to produce and market it.

Just like I said last time and will every time some state wants to limit/ban porn lol if u really think u have more resorces that the Chinese and can stop people when the grate firewall can't even do it lol good luck


Silly people who have absolutely no clue how hard it is to stop anything on the Internet

Won't even go into what I think it's right wrong what I think dose not matter when the fact is it can not be stopped it i's more resorces than any country can spend

a reply to: markovian

This is true. But you see they don't really want to stop it or anything else anyway. They just want to use it to control people and take money from them.

Just like the War on Drugs and everything else. It's not really about ending whatever "thing" it is they're after. They just want to use it as a way to leverage people into their submission. Fines, jails, regulations, etc. Their made to control people and subjugate them into debt or submission to the ruling class while they get to do whatever they want when they want.

It's all just BS.

a reply to: dawnstar


Simply because the dopamine rush, has to have an increased dose after every ingestion. It has to get more bizarre to do this, you either have to give the drug up, or go down the whole gambit to get the same effect. Which will inevitably lead to CP and snuff. In certain addictive personalities.

a reply to: anonentity

I can't imagine that the "rush" of any hormones would be even close to the actual thing, so, have to ask...
should we consider sex as a public health hazard???

a reply to: dukeofjive696969

Where I'm from, they said it would make us go blind and grown hair on our palms. I'm not sure if that's all they said though because my hearing isn't so good, either.

Lol.. biggest wankers in the world wants to ban porn..

What if people watch porn instead of going out and commit infidelity, seems like it would be better to watch porn than go get a hooker.
Maybe they aren't getting enough prostitution busts so they are blaming porn. ?

a reply to: dawnstar

excellent point! if merely watching people have sex is a public health hazard then actually having sex must be much worse.
maybe they will have to pass a law mandating that you have to be blindfolded to have sex because it would be health hazard if you were to accidently see yourself having sex while you were having sex.

originally posted by: dawnstar
This time it's a Virginia republican lawmaker...

Virginia Lawmaker Wants Porn Declared a Public Health Hazard

A Virginia state lawmaker wants to have pornography declared a public health hazard, calling it a moral scourge that leads to infidelity, the "hypersexualization of teenagers" and the objectification of women.

abcnews.go.com...

okay, let's say it does all that....
so, just how is it a public health hazard??
so, he wants was to treat it like cigarettes (which actually do pose a health hazard at least) were treated with the expectations that it would lead to future restrictions.. and increase in tax revenue if cigarettes give us any clue.

Chaffing, rashes, muscle soreness, low supply of Jergens at the store as well as Kleenex....

oh , the trials and tribulations of masturbating to porn daily.

originally posted by: dawnstar
This time it's a Virginia republican lawmaker...

Virginia Lawmaker Wants Porn Declared a Public Health Hazard

A Virginia state lawmaker wants to have pornography declared a public health hazard, calling it a moral scourge that leads to infidelity, the "hypersexualization of teenagers" and the objectification of women.

abcnews.go.com...

okay, let's say it does all that....
so, just how is it a public health hazard??
so, he wants was to treat it like cigarettes (which actually do pose a health hazard at least) were treated with the expectations that it would lead to future restrictions.. and increase in tax revenue if cigarettes give us any clue.

They should ban JCPenney magazines too because when I was a growing teenager I used those. I hadn't touched porn, so can't blame that. Then there're the wet dreams and subtler things before I grabbed my first JCPenney catalog. I think what's really going on is some people don't want sexual desire to exist. They also want to control every person around them, even the thoughts they think. What's so hard to understand. We have instincts, sexual ones maybe the least of them, and without handing out pills like candy it's here to stay.

So here's hte answer. Ban all images of woman whether they be on TV, in magazines, books or wherever. Ban all videos. Then you have ot ban other things too, Ban dil***. I've never liked they use dil***. Is disrespecting to myself and I. I also am greatly hurt when they imagine they're with Gregory Peck or Cary Grant or the like. Ban everything people use. Declare sexual desire a disorder. Modulate puberty. Parts of the brain don't have to "mature".

It's not too late to further ***** up this world. Ne'er say never!

a reply to: dawnstar


I suppose dopamine is a hormone.


Sex is a killer its probably best to give it up.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: dawnstar


Simply because the dopamine rush, has to have an increased dose after every ingestion. It has to get more bizarre to do this, you either have to give the drug up, or go down the whole gambit to get the same effect. Which will inevitably lead to CP and snuff. In certain addictive personalities.

Except we get old. Teens twerk nearly a thousand times by 20. By the age of 40 you're probably only doing it 25 times a year. Age is a factor.

YOu're right addictivie personalities will have more trouble. Almost everythnig is addictive, including shopping, eating and internet.

Here is a research study on masturbation:
healthland.time.com - Study: Boys Masturbate More Than Girls. Seriously....

Results are those who masturbate are more likely to try intercourse or other oral. And the boys are more likely to use condoms.

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
I think the priest in class used to tell us that masturbation makes you go deaf, but im not sure if that's what he was really saying my hearing isint so good.

Makes you dumb to not enogh blood for boht. hang in their ?-:

He's right. It is a crime against all souls and all children. No sane world has any porn in it. This is something many of us know from the time we're toddlers. In the 60's, long before the current crop of politicians.

I wouldn't be viewing victims in any porn. We're supposed to be helping each other, uplifting others, forming groups and ending homelessness, and creating both Equality and Freedom. We're not supposed to view others being exploited.

And for those who are in it because they want money, they're not. That's stockholm syndrome at the least, but most likely they're victims of generational ritual behavior in families, who exploit their children. Most famous people are military and black op kids, who have been exploited.

Its all about exploitation, and in some countries its about grueling poverty.

You don't view and use victims as entertainment. You instead speak up and out against the injustices in this world and try to create a place where everyone is safe.

Some of you must have been raised in strange places.

Or I was...?

I don't recall a single discussion, or lecture, about the evils of porn, or *ahem* associated activities...

originally posted by: dawnstar
This time it's a Virginia republican lawmaker...

Virginia Lawmaker Wants Porn Declared a Public Health Hazard

A Virginia state lawmaker wants to have pornography declared a public health hazard, calling it a moral scourge that leads to infidelity, the "hypersexualization of teenagers" and the objectification of women.

abcnews.go.com...

okay, let's say it does all that....
so, just how is it a public health hazard??
so, he wants was to treat it like cigarettes (which actually do pose a health hazard at least) were treated with the expectations that it would lead to future restrictions.. and increase in tax revenue if cigarettes give us any clue.

Just another religious lunatic fascist... nothing to see here, folks.
Consider the source!

#midgetpornmatters

...and for the SJW, Triggered, Millenial, Everyone gets a trophy, their are no losers, PC crowd:

#littlepeoplepornmatters

...and for the Wizard of Oz Folks:

#lollipopguildpornmatters

...and for the Star Wars crowd:

#wookiepornmatters
#ewokpornmatters

....I could do this all day.

a reply to: Unity_99

so, our new first lady is suffering from stockholm syndrome?

does anything you posted raise porn to the level of being a public health hazard??

seriously?

isn't there laws already that put restrictions, much like cigarettes onto porn, don't you have to be an adult to buy it in the store?
and, aren't there safeguards on at least american websites that are supposed to prevent kids from getting onto the sites? although, I'll admit, they might be rather easy to get around. heck, I don't know, porn isn't really my thing..

my thing is looking at the laws they write, trying to break them down into the principles within them and seeing if they are consistent with the rest of the laws.
so assuming that porn might cause some mental problems... what else in society is perfectly legal that can cause mental problems?
and to be honest, our recent political debates during this past elections kind of proves that political debates can cause mental illness!
so should we restrict those in some way to protect the population, declaring them a public health hazard?
what about religions?? I doubt if there isn't a church in the country that doesn't preach about how women are to be obedient to their husbands, and try to set them off as "helpers" to the men, not leaders, not creatures that should be in control of their own destiny, nope they were given to man to help them.
that kind of can cause mental illness also!

Porn is very educational.

Great for lessons in anatomy and physiology, and the variations in God's design of mankind.

Some of it is very artistic and beautiful, while a lot of it is quite ugly and disgusting.

It has that power to bring out a "range of emotions" in the viewer, which itself is enlightening.

Overall it's quite "desensitizing", so that it takes more to arouse an individual watcher of porn than a non-watcher.

This should, in principle, reduce workplace sexual harassment, since the typical worker can't compete with the perfect bodies that appear on screen, so your average worker, male or female, are no longer seen as sexually desirable, and thus nobody bothers them for sex. But, this hypothesis, while logical, needs to be scientifically tested, and proven.

It raises peoples bedroom expectations to such unrealistic levels, that most people are turned off from real sex, and are thus freed to think and do other things in the society.

After watching sufficient porn, the individual becomes automatically turned off of the porn itself, and then becomes like the buddha, free from desire. So, in the end, porn is liberating. The opposite sex no longer has control over the individual, because the desire has been flushed out of the soul.

Hence, whether porn is good or bad, depends on whether you think people should be able to control and harass others by showing off their flesh, or be immune from such influences.