It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: intrptr
The tritium in sights on M16s in the 80's rotted the glass vials they were contained in, turning them to glow in the dark jelly.
The earliest use of tritium in weapon sights was in 1975. And it was an optic very much the precursor to today's TA01 ACOG.
None of the effects you listed took place on those weapons. In fact, after about 12-15 years, depending on the phosphor gas used, they would stop glowing entirely.
No M16s were outfitted with night sights and issued to any soldier in the 80s. Trijicon(as it is known today) is the pioneer of tritium self luminous sighting systems. Their systems were first used in the US military in the early 90s as the TA01 ACOG. It is still considered top of the line and priced accordingly.
If you're gonna spread BS at least make sure no one who knows what they are talking about is around.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: EartOccupant
If its really Tritium, its radioactive. It will decay the housing over time and leak jellied radioactive goo. If you put the end of the flashlight in your mouth for hands free activity, that could be ingesting radioactive materials, the worst case scenario.
Just get some glow in the dark plastic instead.
A buck 2fitty at the toy store.
Further: Watch dials used to be lit by it, and at one point Tritium night sights were incorporated in the front sight post of M16s. Those stocks were rotted a few years after they were issued, and considered hazardous. I remember seeing cases of the jellied things for sale at the gun shows.
Cue the radioactive banana crowd.
originally posted by: Bedlam
a reply to: intrptr
The vial's in that slit. Tritium's a gas. It doesn't form white residue. That sight looks like a mepro. I don't think tritium sights came standard on M16s.
Beta radiation from tritium averages about 6kev, and doesn't cause material damage because it's not very energetic. Tritium's not any more chemically corrosive than hydrogen.
originally posted by: Sparkitekt
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: EartOccupant
If its really Tritium, its radioactive. It will decay the housing over time and leak jellied radioactive goo. If you put the end of the flashlight in your mouth for hands free activity, that could be ingesting radioactive materials, the worst case scenario.
Just get some glow in the dark plastic instead.
A buck 2fitty at the toy store.
Further: Watch dials used to be lit by it, and at one point Tritium night sights were incorporated in the front sight post of M16s. Those stocks were rotted a few years after they were issued, and considered hazardous. I remember seeing cases of the jellied things for sale at the gun shows.
Cue the radioactive banana crowd.
Tritium has been used in watches for over 50 years. Those watches are still ticking.
If a tritium tube breaks, one should leave the area and allow the gas to diffuse into the air. Tritium exists naturally in the environment, but in very small quantities. Persons working with the gas face another hazard: tritium reacts with the oxygen in air, forming tritiated water. This moisture is readily ingested by the body. When in contact with any hydrocarbon the tritium atom replaces the natural hydrogen. This can even occur with the natural oil on a person's skin.
consumer and safety devices containing tritium for use in the United States are subject to certain possession, resale, disposal, and use restrictions. In the US, devices such as self-luminous exit signs, gauges, wrist watches, etc. that contain small amounts of tritium are under the jurisdiction of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and are subject to possession, distribution, and import and export regulations found in 10 CFR Parts, 30, 32, and 110. They are also subject to regulations for possession, use and disposal in certain states. Luminous products containing quantities of tritium greater than that which is used for a wrist watch are not widely available at retail outlets in the United States.
originally posted by: intrptr
The vial is gone. The residue is powdered radioactive glass, from the vial. This is a steel post, look at the threaded portion, it is eroded.
Finally, "Tritium's not any more chemically corrosive than hydrogen." riiight. Though a low emitter with a relatively short half-life, tritium is harmful to humans if inhaled or ingested.
Why don't you do a test and inhale some (its gaseous) and get back to me after you develop lung cancer.
If I had to pick something to be exposed to, it would be tritium.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: intrptr
This is a steel post, look at the threaded portion, it is eroded.
That sight is ancient, who knows what type of conditions it experienced.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Bedlam
If I had to pick something to be exposed to, it would be tritium.
How a bout a nice X-ray or airline flight?
Art least when they are done the source is turned off and the exposure ends. As opposed to internalized sources that can't be turned off.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: intrptr
No thanks, I don't want radioactive sources in close contact with my body, on or in anything anything I own.
Better find some way to get the potassium out of your body.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Bedlam
And it's sooooooo 'radioactive' the guy is bare-handing it.
originally posted by: intrptr
I used to bathe up to my elbows in trichlor in vapor degreasers in the PCB industry, soldered power supples...
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Bedlam
If I had to pick something to be exposed to, it would be tritium.
How a bout a nice X-ray or airline flight?
Art least when they are done the source is turned off and the exposure ends. As opposed to internalized sources that can't be turned off.
You'll pee off whatever tritium you're exposed to with a half life of about a week. And it's about the crappiest emitter there is. Radon is a lot worse.
Also you're filled with K-40. It's also a beta emitter. You're irradiating yourself, right now.
originally posted by: intrptr
So far you haven't show one source for your claims. Nice try with potassium / banana gambit. Double background is hardly what I call a health risk.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: intrptr
This is a steel post, look at the threaded portion, it is eroded.
That sight is ancient, who knows what type of conditions it experienced.
originally posted by: intrptr
It was irradiated.
You said ANY radioactive source was deadly. Well, you're full of one. Not counting background radiation, which is always there.