It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kentuckymama
You must never sleep. You are always here to let us know about the earthquakes. I appreciate that. Just wanted to say thanks and ask what you think the chance is for a sizeable earthquake anytime soon near me. I'm in western Kentucky.
originally posted by: TrueAmerican
Ok I admit it. I couldn't sleep much, wondering what the heck was gonna happen with this. And now it appears the quakes are inching closer and closer to the Mono Lake volcanic field:
originally posted by: TrueAmerican
estimated 5+, possibly 6+
waiting on USGS reports
More in a minute....
5.8, but real, real, shallow- showing 0 km depth, will likely get revised. Nice, that ought to send some shockwaves right into Long Valley supervolcano. That's always nice...
. That is SO not good...
originally posted by: spirit_horse
a reply to: TrueAmerican
Hey TA, just a shot in the dark, but the old YS VS Calderas appear to have moved west from the source of the hot spot. Could the same have happened with the Long Valley caldera and the quakes further east could be from the hot spot that originally fed the LV Caldera?
I recall reading about the magma plume under the YS system possibly being all the way to the Oregon/Washington volcanic systems. Could we see new volcanoes develop east of the source that created the LV system? I know a section of Rocky Mountain chain approximately 80 miles subsided into the earth a long time ago associated with a Yellowstone eruption. Just wondering what your opinion on the matter was?
originally posted by: muzzy
I would tend to follow this site, they feed USGS anyway
www.seismo.unr.edu...
the 5.7's were 8.2 and 12km deep, not 0km