It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: neformore
a reply to: SoulSurfer
So you say Snopes is bias but you quote an article from the Daily Mail?
You do know that the Mail is a steaming pile of sensationalist horse crap and is considered something of a joke for its constant doom headlines over here in the UK?
originally posted by: UKTruth
...the details can be easily checked out. The court records filed in the divorce proceedings are available and the 'other' woman in question is well known, having run for public office during which time she was open about her past. Really, there is nothing wrong with her past - her life, her choice. She did not break any laws. However, there is more to this story in the way that the Snopes founder behaved and also the political history of this other woman. The alleged deceit and political leanings do not sit well with a self proclaimed honest and unbiased source.
One only needs to look at a history of their true/false assessments to know that they are biased and untrustworthy when it comes to assessing the validity of any story. As for the Daily Mail, they are not claiming to be the arbiter of truth (as Snopes position themselves).