Alien Base Discovered on Mars? Domes/UFO,Road,Dam and symbol

Hello, there are some very strange things located in the Juventae Fons area on Mars.
These things looks contructed and not formed by nature to me.

Looks like a a ancient industrial area with factories, very strange stuff.



Here are some highlights of the video:

Yes, for sure it is a Hydroelectric in Mars.

Some are possible lava flows ? Keep em coming

I like how you have to draw on the pictures to make your argument a little more obvious.
But nah, just natural formations

a reply to: Spacespider

Spider, still drawing ATS into your web?

a reply to: Spacespider

Guessing GreyFace is your channel , must do better unless you're just looking for hits.

Google Earth is a poor research tool , original Hi Res NASA / ESA images should be used if you really want to look for anomalies.

a reply to: Spacespider

There's a HiRISE stereo pair available for that area to get a 3D impression of the terrain (anaglyphs required):

Source

Looks like eroded ridges to me, the separations along the alleged dam could be sand/dunes.

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Spacespider

Spider, still drawing ATS into your web?

I need to feed

a reply to: jeep3r

That do not shine much light on to it..

I still see the features as in the google earth

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Spacespider

Guessing GreyFace is your channel , must do better unless you're just looking for hits.

Google Earth is a poor research tool , original Hi Res NASA / ESA images should be used if you really want to look for anomalies.

There are no hires pictures of that area.. I wonder why..

a reply to: Spacespider

Martians must not use a square, level, or tape measure when building anything I guess. Or are they going for that "organic look"?

a reply to: ArMaP

Indeed.
www.uahirise.org...

Nothing to see here... keep mooving

originally posted by: ArMaP

The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.

originally posted by: Spacespider
There are no hires pictures of that area.. I wonder why..

That's obviously wrong, as the useless video shows a HiRISE photo. Isn't something like 30 cm per pixel higher enough resolution for you?

As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.

Yes sure..
But I said Hires.. not hirise
My point was that even better quality from that area would be interesting to see

originally posted by: DogMeat
Nothing to see here... keep mooving

I am guessing you are addressing the comment you just made
Or you are just copy pasting the words as you where told to by your comfort zone matter

originally posted by: DogMeat
Nothing to see here... keep mooving

I am guessing you are addressing the comment you just made
Or you are just copy pasting the words as you where told to by your comfort zone matter

originally posted by: DogMeat
Nothing to see here... keep mooving

I am guessing you are addressing the comment you just made
Or you are just copy pasting the words as you where told to by your comfort zone matter

originally posted by: Spacespider
But I said Hires.. not hirise

I know.

My point was that even better quality from that area would be interesting to see

You think that 30 cm per pixel is not good enough?

a reply to: Spacespider

And he pointed out that the resolution was actually quite high - the pages with the actual images on tell you that.

I'm assuming that people have identified the correct area? I'm getting a little tired of generating click revenue for bogus claims by 'Greyface' so I'm not watching them.

The features shown are natural erosional features, you can find countless analogues for them on Earth.