It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: HUMBLEONE
Civil war is when one or more parties are vying for control of one government. What if Texas (for example) just wants to go its own way and start its own country? That not a "civil war" that is a revolution. I'd love my home state to be its own country. Local is where its at. Whatever lets be PEACEFUL about it!
originally posted by: ketsuko
I wonder how many people thought that before the American Revolution or the Civil War?
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: ketsuko
I wonder how many people thought that before the American Revolution or the Civil War?
Not even remotely the same conditions.
Plus who would be fighting who in this theory???
The Left vs. Right??? Republicans vs. Democrats???
That's ridiculous. I'll admit there are some douchey folks on both sides with enough hate in their hearts to take it that far, but most people simply don't hate other people enough to give up their lives to go fight in the streets over it.
It's more likely that a civil war would break out between The People and the Establishment or something. Most people aren't even that interested in politics to give a sh*t.
They just do their job to make some money so they can relax and have a BBQ now and then.
You have to have a pretty messed up view of society to think we're that close to all out war in the streets with each other.
originally posted by: Greggers
In this hypothetical scenario, are you proposing that the military would fracture?
That seems very unlikely. People like to talk about civil war. There is absolutely nothing that would cause one in the present climate (as long as people aren't starving or being killed), and certainly not one that would cause the President to lose control of the U.S. Military.
Because barring that, the side with the military on its side is going to win, no matter where they are located.
And how are we even supposed to know who the enemy is? You think in trying to win a war, the generals would just decide to keep their entire army holed up in indefensible positions?
Seems ridiculous.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Greggers
You think not?
I think it highly likely the military would fracture, just like it did during the last Civil War.