It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ohio Gov. John Kasich vetoed a measure that would have outlawed abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected while approving a law that outlaws abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy.
"Similar legislation enacted in two other states has twice been declared unconstitutional by federal judges, and the Supreme Court declined to review those decisions," he said in a statement.
The vetoed proposal, commonly referred to as the "heartbeat bill," would have been the nation's strictest time-based legislation, banning abortions around six weeks.
"The 20-week ban will force women to travel long distances and cross state lines in order to access safe, legal abortion -- a barrier that many women simply cannot afford. This is just another shameful attempt by John Kasich to make abortion illegal."
Why are women allowed to be serial killers if they chose?
So a woman is allowed to end a life, LEGALLY no less
That adult decision should be made before the two parties get in the sack together!! Hello!!??? How many children have been executed because of the "heat of passion" clause and a procedure to sweep it under the rug should it go to custard???
originally posted by: GreyScale
a reply to: EternalShadow
It's not serial killing.
It's choosing to be an adult and make an adult decision.
Nature does that as well, but you probably don't want to hear that either.
Try foster parenting for 20 years or so... it will solidify your views on abortion.
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: EternalShadow
Why are women allowed to be serial killers if they chose?
So a woman is allowed to end a life, LEGALLY no less
What you're saying is in complete conflict.
A serial killer is someone who has committed multiple murders. Murder is the unlawful act of taking human life. Abortions being legal are therefore not murder and so a discussion of serial killing is utterly erroneous.
originally posted by: EternalShadow
That adult decision should be made before the two parties get in the sack together!! Hello!!??? How many children have been executed because of the "heat of passion" clause and a procedure to sweep it under the rug should it go to custard???
originally posted by: GreyScale
a reply to: EternalShadow
You're excuses are bs.
originally posted by: GreyScale
originally posted by: EternalShadow
That adult decision should be made before the two parties get in the sack together!! Hello!!??? How many children have been executed because of the "heat of passion" clause and a procedure to sweep it under the rug should it go to custard???
originally posted by: GreyScale
a reply to: EternalShadow
You're excuses are bs.
I had 2 of my 5 children on birth control. The last one after my wife had her tubes tied. The 6th we had aborted.
Care to keep going on this?
Whatever helps you sleep at night....wow...
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: EternalShadow
Whatever helps you sleep at night....wow...
Giving an explanation on how what you're saying is in error in a discussion thread. I know, my actions are just so disgusting.
You can in turn explain how i'm wrong, you know. Explain how a legal abortion is illegal and therefore should constitute as murder. It won't have any bearing on my sleep but i'd like to see it.
Care to keep f#ing to prove your point? Get real...
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: EternalShadow
No. It's a matter of you throwing out legal jargon with zero understanding of what the legal terms mean.
You're reinventing the language in order to spew out vitriol.
Someone having a legal abortion is not committing murder under the eyes of the Law. Hence why they are not getting convicted of being serial killers.
You're talking about non-reality.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: EternalShadow
do you realize that there are some spouses out there who, if their mate decided that hey, we have enough kids, I really don't want anymore, so we aren't gonna do the act anymore, well, their mate would rather leave and find someone else to play with than live without sex?? if the couple has three, four, or five or more kids that they are taking care of together, is your self-rightous attitude about abortion worth a divorce and three, four, five or more kids being added to the welfare roles for the taxpayer to pay for?
no birth control method is 100% effective, so there is always a chance of a child being conceived. and some people value the intimacy in their marriage far more than you seem to...