Trump Picks Climate Change Dissenter to Lead EPA

a reply to: BubbaJoe

It's been posted. Google it.

The best part, that I forgot to mention on the side, was how the entire Obama / DNC argument was that healthcare needed to be de-privatized (cant be FOR PROFIT that's evil), and that's what everyone expected of Obamacare... yet of course it didn't come out to be that, meanwhile one the first things he did was privatize NASA!

Because of this ethically ambiguous freak that Trump picked we have earthquakes now because of his pro fracking stance.

And to be fair Hillary was pro fracking.

Again, corporate interests are out of control.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: BubbaJoe

It's been posted. Google it.

The best part, that I forgot to mention on the side, was how the entire Obama / DNC argument was that healthcare needed to be de-privatized (cant be FOR PROFIT that's evil), and that's what everyone expected of Obamacare... yet of course it didn't come out to be that, meanwhile one the first things he did was privatize NASA!

If you are going to make claims, post a source, if it is some word press blog don't bother. I am not googling squat, you made the claim, now prove it.

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
Trump Picks Scott Pruitt, Climate Change Dissenter, to Lead E.P.A.
www.nytimes.com...

WASHINGTON — President-elect Donald J. Trump has selected Scott Pruitt, the Oklahoma attorney general and a close ally of the fossil fuel industry, to run the Environmental Protection Agency, signaling Mr. Trump’s determination to dismantle President Obama’s efforts to counter climate change — and much of the E.P.A. itself.

What the F is this?

There's really not much to say about this. Con man, villain, or total dumb#ss.... take your pick. Seems like an unwise move to me.... that is, if your goal for the EPA is Environmental Protection.

Just more of the same from the worst President Elect of all time. Share... discuss... talk about how the New York Times is leftist garbage. Or Climate Science is a Chinese hoax. I haven't yet plunged a coat hanger into my brain, so I still see this for the repugnancy it is. BUT maybe some of the more specially educated and lesser principled individuals can enlighten me to the greatness in this.

For everyone else... We're in a villain's world now. So... Here's more villainy for you. Enjoy.

It's too bad ATS is an echo chamber of people who reject peer reviewed science.

Or even give enough a damn to just have clean drinking water and air. Look at what happened to China. I mean there is a limit to what you can defend.

a reply to: BubbaJoe

Alright screw it:

Under President Obama, NASA’s earth science budget has grown significantly, rising from $1.5 billion in 2009 to $2 billion next year. (For comparison, NASA’s space exploration budget for next year is $2.8 billion.)
www.vox.com...

originally posted by: bananasam

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
Trump Picks Scott Pruitt, Climate Change Dissenter, to Lead E.P.A.
www.nytimes.com...

WASHINGTON — President-elect Donald J. Trump has selected Scott Pruitt, the Oklahoma attorney general and a close ally of the fossil fuel industry, to run the Environmental Protection Agency, signaling Mr. Trump’s determination to dismantle President Obama’s efforts to counter climate change — and much of the E.P.A. itself.

What the F is this?

There's really not much to say about this. Con man, villain, or total dumb#ss.... take your pick. Seems like an unwise move to me.... that is, if your goal for the EPA is Environmental Protection.

Just more of the same from the worst President Elect of all time. Share... discuss... talk about how the New York Times is leftist garbage. Or Climate Science is a Chinese hoax. I haven't yet plunged a coat hanger into my brain, so I still see this for the repugnancy it is. BUT maybe some of the more specially educated and lesser principled individuals can enlighten me to the greatness in this.

For everyone else... We're in a villain's world now. So... Here's more villainy for you. Enjoy.

It's too bad ATS is an echo chamber of people who reject peer reviewed science.

Or even give enough a damn to just have clean drinking water and air. Look at what happened to China. I mean there is a limit to what you can defend.

They will continue to defend it, because their orange messiah demands it.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

www.telegraph.co.uk...

originally posted by: BubbaJoe

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: BubbaJoe

It's been posted. Google it.

The best part, that I forgot to mention on the side, was how the entire Obama / DNC argument was that healthcare needed to be de-privatized (cant be FOR PROFIT that's evil), and that's what everyone expected of Obamacare... yet of course it didn't come out to be that, meanwhile one the first things he did was privatize NASA!

If you are going to make claims, post a source, if it is some word press blog don't bother. I am not googling squat, you made the claim, now prove it.

another f'n youtube video, these are not sources, what part of that do you not understand?

a reply to: BubbaJoe

Its the actual NASA cheif talking about what I'm saying. Google it. This is practically common knowledge around here. Old stuff. The idea that every single thing one might include in an articulation needs to include references in each post is outlandish.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

www.telegraph.co.uk...

Seriously, an al-azzeriah quote

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: BubbaJoe

Its the actual NASA cheif talking about what I'm saying. Google it. This is practically common knowledge around here. Old stuff. The idea that every single thing one might include in an articulation needs to include references in each post is outlandish.

You do realize that stuff on YouTube is edited, and sometimes taken out of context, not thanks, I will not consider YouTube a news source. The other one quote is al-azzerja, so no thanks, neither are credible.

a reply to: BubbaJoe

Believe it or don't, not my problem. If it's something you want to know about, go look for it. Crying because your not provided something is not a legitimate means of attaining information.

a reply to: BubbaJoe

People like you are impossible, if you don't like the source then look for it yourself.

originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: BubbaJoe

People like you are impossible, if you don't like the source then look for it yourself.

Anyone claiming crap as fact and not providing a source, I am not buying. I am perfectly capable of searching google, in fact make a portion of my living that way. Some asshat quoting arabic websites, is not an expert. Quote the GD source or quit publically making the claims. QUOTE THE F'N SOURCE

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: BubbaJoe

Believe it or don't, not my problem. If it's something you want to know about, go look for it. Crying because your not provided something is not a legitimate means of attaining information.

Why, you are claiming it as fact, the burden of proof lies on you.

originally posted by: BubbaJoe

originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: BubbaJoe

People like you are impossible, if you don't like the source then look for it yourself.

Anyone claiming crap as fact and not providing a source, I am not buying. I am perfectly capable of searching google, in fact make a portion of my living that way. Some asshat quoting arabic websites, is not an expert. Quote the GD source or quit publically making the claims. QUOTE THE F'N SOURCE

Who cares if it's an Arabic website/news site? Are you saying you don't trust Arabs?

a reply to: BubbaJoe

I DID.

Play the damn video.

a reply to: BubbaJoe

Proof, that has been provided. Job done.

Please see previous post.

"When I became the NASA administrator -- or before I became the NASA administrator -- he charged me with three things. One was he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math, he wanted me to expand our international relationships, and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science ... and math and engineering," www.foxnews.com...

Just because CNN didn't report on it doesn't mean ti didn't happen.

This is not the Mud Pit!

Keeping that in mind...

1. Quit the bickering.
2. You are responsible for your own posts.
3. Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)
4. Stay on topic.



and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!