It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This is only one of the freaky pieces of art. There are reports of Podesta entertaining and enjoying his guests shocked responses to his, well, unique tastes.
originally posted by: kibric
a reply to: seasonal
This is only one of the freaky pieces of art. There are reports of Podesta entertaining and enjoying his guests shocked responses to his, well, unique tastes.
some like to play monster
until the real monsters show up...
then its
" please god , jesus forgive me "
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: seasonal
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
Look closely at the picture of the victim and compare it to the work of art.
The victims arms are bent sideways and the knees are tucked. The only similarity is that their backs are bent backwards and that's IT.
Stop flooding the forums with all this noise.
One pizzagate thread per week is enough.
Arch of Hysteria, 1993
Louise Bourgeois
French, American, 1911 - 2010
bronze with silver nitrate patina
83.8 x 101.5 x 58.4 cm
Purchased 2005
National Gallery of Canada (no. 41581)
© The Easton Foundation
Stemming from her interest in the physical, emotional, and psychological aspects of pain and fear, Bourgeois was drawn to the arch of hysteria as theorized and represented by the nineteenth-century neurologist Jean Martin Charcot (1825-1893). While working at the Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris, Charcot sought to represent hysteria by documenting the performances of his female patients. The physical tension of the hysterical arch - an intense muscular contraction, resulting in immobility and paralysis of the limbs - is emblematic of an equally extreme emotional state. Bourgeois makes this highly vulnerable position even more so by suspending her male figure from the ceiling. In choosing to represent him in an attitude traditionally associated with the female, the artist transgresses the social and sexual roles assigned to women, challenging the misconception of hysteria as a female malady. Source
Sick #ers. I don't understand how some people can still be in denial about it all. hmmm....
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: seasonal
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
Look closely at the picture of the victim and compare it to the work of art.
The victims arms are bent sideways and the knees are tucked. The only similarity is that their backs are bent backwards and that's IT.
originally posted by: seasonal
Thank you for the info, I looked up the artist, and found that it is part of her suspended (in the air) work. An her work can be disturbing.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
Thanks buddy.
Thank you for doing the one thing that none of these pizzagate pushers thought to do.