Obama Slams Stein's Recounts: The Results "Accurately Reflect The Will Of The American People"

ZERO HEDGE

Zero Hedge's content is conspiratorial, anti-establishment and economically pessimistic,[3] and has been criticized for presenting extreme and sometimes pro-Russian views. en.wikipedia.org...

Unmasking the Men Behind Zero Hedge, Wall Street's Renegade Blog: www.bloomberg.com...

NO THANKS.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: IAMTAT

I didn't know Bernie had a mansion.

Is that the 600,000 dollar house that any career senator could get a mortgage for especially close to retirement? They get a nice little retirement package.

Maybe it's the one Hillary paid the mortgage off on if he would just shut up and endorse her and tell everyone to vote for her.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: JesusXst

I Predict P.A. and Mich. Will REFUSE to have a Recount Due to a Lack Of Evidence to Justify it . The Reason for Wisc. going ahead with one has Still Not been Explained in Detail by the Wisc. Elections Commission .

I agree. However, I can't see it going past that. The whole thing is Suspicious, and being done through dirty deeds by dirty people.

originally posted by: Annee
ZERO HEDGE

Zero Hedge's content is conspiratorial, anti-establishment and economically pessimistic,[3] and has been criticized for presenting extreme and sometimes pro-Russian views. en.wikipedia.org...

Unmasking the Men Behind Zero Hedge, Wall Street's Renegade Blog: www.bloomberg.com...

NO THANKS.

YOUR OPINION.
NO THANX!

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: IAMTAT

I didn't know Bernie had a mansion.

Is that the 600,000 dollar house that any career senator could get a mortgage for especially close to retirement? They get a nice little retirement package.

Sorry...Bernie's new THIRD home...a lakefront vacation house.

Hillary Clinton ✔ @HillaryClinton

Donald Trump refused to say that he’d respect the results of this election. That’s a direct threat to our democracy. 10:53 AM - 24 Oct 2016

1.THE COST OF LOSING? MILLIONS Including special help $$ from a Saudi Prince.

2.RESULT OF LOSING? BAD SHOWMANSHIP.

3.WATCHING THE LOSERS WHINE OVER IT? PRICELESS.

a reply to: Annee

You support your distaste for Zero Hedge with a page from Wikipedia.

The irony!

As far as I'm aware, Zero Hedge's Wikipedia page is not protected. You could have edited the page before using it to support you opinion, hence why Wikipedia is not considered a reputable source.

a reply to: JesusXst

A star for you.
And well done by the way,,,,,,,,,,,,very nice indeed.

originally posted by: grayghost
a reply to: JesusXst

A star for you.
And well done by the way,,,,,,,,,,,,very nice indeed.

Cheers my friend I appreciate it!

originally posted by: pirhanna
Does Obama see her as vying for control of the democratic party when he is laying his own claim to it? Or is he just being straight. Cant tell with Obama. I dont like a lot of his policies, and he can lie with the best of them but i dont think he wants to destroy america, and sometimes hes candid.

In my own opinion, Obama knows Trumps got it, it's a done deal and trying to stay in whatever good graces he can before Trump takes over his throne.

a reply to: JesusXst

Even a snake can smile.

A good thing to remember when dealing with Obama,Hilary,or any other liberal.

a reply to: JesusXst

This is the part from the clinton campaign that tickles me:

but now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides

Why would anyone think clinton involvement would equate to "fairness to all sides"???

Who are they kidding? They are the most corrupt political team in history! How in the hell will they ensure the process is fair? They seem opportunistic to me, nothing more. Shady motherf*ckers!

Also, Obama knows that a ton of Democratic tampering and cheating will be uncovered. The recount findings will further diminish the Democratic party's stature in America. A 5th nail in their coffin, after WikiLeaks, PizzaGate, Crooked Media shills, and Donald Trump drove in the first 4 nails.

a reply to: Annee

When Trump wins this election this will only make the liberals look even more foolish.

Their reputation will be about as good as a hooker at the prom.

originally posted by: Diisenchanted
a reply to: Annee

When Trump wins this election this will only make the liberals look even more foolish.

Their reputation will be about as good as a hooker at the prom.

Apparently aging, sickly Hillary has nothing to lose by hitching her pantsuit to Stein's recount request. She eagerly joined forces with her today, I heard.

a reply to: Diisenchanted

Nonetheless, protesters against democracy will protest. Haters gonna hate.

I cant imagine how many pizza parties would be held in a Hillary/Podesta White House.

Hell, they might even decriminalize whatever theyve been doing this whole time.

originally posted by: [post=21576361]six67seven

a reply to: [post=21576015]JesusXst

This is the part from the clinton campaign that tickles me:

but now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides

Why would anyone think clinton involvement would equate to "fairness to all sides"???

Who are they kidding? They are the most corrupt political team in history! How in the hell will they ensure the process is fair? They seem opportunistic to me, nothing more. Shady motherf*ckers!

I hear ya! Opportunistic to it's Maximum. If money don't talk people will walk. Shady is exactly what this is. Just glad it's over for the most part.

a reply to: JesusXst

This is all we need to know, to realize there was no foul play. So this is either an attepmt to steal these states (at worst) or just a complete waste of money based on an unsound and desparate opinion (at best).

See here:

The New York magazine article reported that activists had claimed to have found data — but no proof — showing that results may have been “manipulated or hacked” in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania — three states where Clinton lost by just a narrow margin. But one of the computer scientists, J. Alex Halderman, a computer science professor from the University of Michigan, said in a blog post Wednesday morning that the magazine’s article was inaccurate. “Were this year’s deviations from pre-election polls the results of a cyberattack? Probably not. I believe the most likely explanation is that the polls were systematically wrong, rather than that the election was hacked,” Halderman wrote.

Bosto n globe

And this statement if coming from a University of Michigan professor!

originally posted by: Diisenchanted
a reply to: Annee

When Trump wins this election this will only make the liberals look even more foolish.

Their reputation will be about as good as a hooker at the prom.

Read Trump in transcript.

originally posted by: angryproctologist
a reply to: JesusXst

Even a snake can smile.

A good thing to remember when dealing with Obama,Hilary,or any other liberal.

Perhaps David Icke was right?