Mars rover Curiosity takes picture of a collapsed wall on Mars ?

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: intrptr

We're talking about the 4 grey block's on the extreme right of the pic

I know. Look at the whole vid, YouTuber implicates the foreground rock as the source of the 'blocks' as you denote them.

The big 'structure' (the 'blocks' are 'from'), is a natural feature wth mineral veins running throughout, but appears to be fractured geometrically (at the bottom left), like near another impact crater on earth. Look at the bottom left of the upper layer to see the 'block like' pattern in the fractured rock...

Santa Fe Crater

Then at the Nasa pic from Mars, bottom left...

OP pic, NASA

Ya think Elon Musk is going to invest billions of dollars in a project to send people to mars if the is no real evidence of a possibility there was once something alive on the red planet? I can agree with some that say it just a rock formation, however we really dont know $hit when it come to history or what has really happened to the solar system and the planets. It would seem every year we make a new discovery of something that was thought as known. So to definitively say that what ever the rover is looking at is simply something that "Looks" like a wall is rather short sighted. The real possibility of what is truly there wont satisfy anyone till human eyes can verify, unfortunately. Which is most likely why the big players are working towards making that happen. I for one think Mars was once alive, and hope one day to see it physically explored to put that notion to rest or confirm.

It will Not mater What they find on mars.
they will say its just a rock.
even if they find vatican city or the twin towers.

originally posted by: watchitburn
Cool,

I'll say it's the best such example I've seen so far. I'd like to see more images from that location.

I agree that this is the most unnatural appearing rock formation I've seen in the Mars photos. In fact from my point this may be the first one that seems like its more unnatural than natural. It is evidence, but not proof by any stretch. The cynics who label them self skeptics cannot handle the fact that every argument has evidence on both sides. Where there is evidence, a cynic will say its isn't evidence.

However, if it does turn out to be artificially made by intelligent life, it would not necessarily have to be life that evolved on Mars was later wiped out. It could be structures used by space aliens for a landing pad or research outpost for example. Personally I think being used as an outpost would be as likely of a scenario as life on Mars having been sophisticated at some point.

That said, I suspect this is a natural formation, but I can see also how it is possible that it isn't a natural formation. I wouldn't be surprised if a million rocks have been photographed at this point, so eventually you will see some that appear as if they could be unnatural even when they are natural.

a reply to: Spacespider

It's the brick house of the three little pigs that got blown down by the big bad wolf.
(Notice: to the people of this earth that have NO sence of humor..... I'm joking!)


Here is the medical term of what you're seeing "Pareidolia".

a reply to: TrueBrit

Maybe Mars went from Fibonacci to Phi...? And thus creating new minerals after all the booms?

spam removed by staff

41.media.tumblr.com...

Natural geometric formations here on Earth. Must of been aliens.

All I have to say on this subject.

originally posted by: AtomicKangaroo
41.media.tumblr.com...

Natural geometric formations here on Earth. Must of been aliens.

All I have to say on this subject.

That is not a very good comparison.

If you are going to totally rubbish something you have to do better.

Who said it was aliens?

a reply to: gortex

Life is very creative to sustain itsself. What we consider conditions to be succesful often appear not to be the case. When it comes to the possibillity for life on planets I keep a very openmind.

Just my thoughts..

a reply to: Spacespider

Spam content removed by staff

a reply to: theoneandonlytruth

Just wanted to let you know that there are no solid planets you can go to.

Oh , OK , thanks.

Hope this is not a big shock, but it's time to wake up to all the lies our controllers are feeding us with.

If it were true then it would be shocking but it isn't.
The controllers lost control of the menu with the invention of the internet ... aren't we lucky.

Very interesting. Of course no definite conclusions can be made but right angles are generally not found in nature.

a reply to: Spacespider
Google Mars were do you think they get there images.

The best images of Mars are from HiRise as for the supposed wall there are images of similar fractured stone here on Earth that are not man made. Why would only one small section survive

originally posted by: CamoDude9
Very interesting. Of course no definite conclusions can be made but right angles are generally not found in nature.

Whoops.. nature might have something to say about it...


Pyrite


Basalt

a reply to: gortex

So, you are saying that you believe in CGI?
Isn't it better to use telescope to see wandering stars (planets)?
Since Hubble telescope doesn't exist.
Have you ever wandered why they never show us rovers they left on the Moon?
For me, was enough to realize they are lying when they gave us CGI video of the dark side of the Moon.
Do you believe NASA has real photos and videos from space? It is all CGI. Just check videos from ISS, I mean,
clouds that never change shape? Earth spinning at what speed?

a reply to: theoneandonlytruth

Are you for real it would take PAGES to correct all your errors on that post.

Remember the motto here Deny Ignorance.

a reply to: wmd_2008

I thought you need proof for stuff to be real. I mean, CGI is not considered proof, Hollywood makes better
CGI than NASA. Where is the proof for existence of the cosmos without end? Sci-fi movies prove there are galaxies?
NASA CGI pictures? I mean, even NASA engineer Kelly Smith says we never went to the moon, so if they had no problem lying to us in the past, do you think they have problem lying now? I've listened to the astronaut that claimed he went to the moon, he said that temperature would go to 200 degrees Celsius, and when the reporter asked him how they've managed to survive, he said that they've used air-conditioning that works on batteries? Do people believe to what those actors say?