It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
of course...there is no pedophilia at all. Certainly not among the rich and powerful.
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: elementalgrove
Guilty until proven innocent wow you have this backwards. I see this far to often lately people make accusations and they are taken as gospel. Sad people label someone a racist or misogynist or a pedophile and everyone has to think they need to prove there not. But heres the problem its hard to prove a negative no different than saying you cant prove faeries don't exist so it must be true.
I see this country starting a very scary pattern where emotion and supersedes evidence. And this has happened in history many times and the end was never good.
Simple question for you where is all the online gambling sites located?
Did it ever occur to you people that maybe this band used the symbol BECAUSE the pizza place where they play uses the symbol, as a shout out to the restaurant?
originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
a reply to: dragonridr
The evidence is there. Enablers like you just choose to ignore it.
originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
a reply to: Greggers
Did it ever occur to you people that maybe this band used the symbol BECAUSE the pizza place where they play uses the symbol, as a shout out to the restaurant?
It's a possibility...but have you watched the band video from the OP ? you dont find it strange...Sex stains...plenty of "kid" stuff in the video...toys, masks...references to children. Now why would a band that calls itself sex stains...have any reference to children ? and I mean...any reference...
originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
a reply to: imjack
connections are made following the FBI's own manual on identifying pedo simbology.
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: elementalgrove
It was a personal Instagram account, not the business, and I've admitted that some of his images were questionable, that one guy is questionable.
Just because a band played there once doesn't make them implicit, that is a massive leap in logic.
All I want is proper evidence, not the lazy rubbish in the OP.