It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


What these protest's really are.

page: 1

log in


posted on Nov, 15 2016 @ 09:35 PM
A recent thread got me thinking about the protests and what's been happening with them. Linked below.

link to the recent thread

If you followed Sanders through the primaries you should know out of everyone that is talking about the protests he should be the one who has the most "experience" that we know of at protesting.

One would assume he would see the violence at these places and speak out against it and tell everyone that if they wish to protest do it the proper way, not by standing in the middle of the roads effecting peoples day to day lives(also alot of people still have to work and do things at night too)

One person being pushed down stairs, some one getting hit by a car on the freeway, cars being smashed in the streets with people still in their cars just trying to get by peacefully
People beating up people for their opinions, even though the person who is getting beat up just wanted to exchange insurance after a small car accident that no one got hurt from.

It's all unbelievable until you see the videos of these things happening and then see where the hate is coming from.
Its all coming from the msm, the left wing media corporations the left side of social media, the left of everything, I hate to say this but every one on the left who is protesting or perpetuating these protest and the messages of hate, racisim, bigotry, violence have all Been trolled by the biggest trollers that have been trolling the world for more years then the internet has been used by the common world.

They are called the mainstream media and the most political and influential people and celebrities in this world, its truely not hard to see that either, there's enough information on the internet to prove specially how they all are treating this election cycle.

But one thing happened that they didn't add into their equation. How powerful the internet and internet trolling has become, in this reality the internet has more influence on where people get their information from and because of that one simple thing it's made people see through all the trolling the main stream media does so now the people get both sides of the "story".

I have never seen a Trump supporter say NO f off to a Hillary supporters who has changed sides after the election was called but I already know what a Hillary supporter will think of a Trump supporter no matter what evidence or facts is presented about that Trump supporter as long as they support Trump they are automatically and forever will be a "bad" person.

As for Trump he has already spoken and says he wants to work with everyone and said stop to any of his supporters who is being violent. Trump has said it, why can't Sanders and the mainstream media and celebrities say it too?

Not to forget the evidence that the Soros machine have been fueling the fires to start a "civilian" war.

Talking specially about America the people of America should be coming together to curb and stop the violence and racially motived situations and to stop all the wars in the world.

I believe that's what most people want, but all I see is one side that is willing to put differences aside and another tricked to believe the side willing and wanting for peace actually wants to become nazi Germany again.
In this day and age where you've been tricked into believing nearly 61 million people out of the roughly 122 million who voted(current counted) are literally are all the things msm and Hillary supporters say Trump supporters are automatically if they support him.

That to me is some ridiculous way of thinking if you believe. that to be true.

posted on Nov, 15 2016 @ 09:51 PM
a reply to: justneo

I'll say this until I'm blue in the face.

Wikileaks showed Hillary and the DNC ousted Bernie by playing dirty (weird no protests were held then).

Wikileaks showed the DNC propped up Trump as they thought he was the only one she could beat (haha).

So all these protesters need to stop protecting democracy (we had our voice).

And march against their rigged party. Their party got Trump elected, so go to the source not the symptom. Trump would not have won if many people didn't see this blatant interfering with our countries democracy.

posted on Nov, 15 2016 @ 09:58 PM
These protest agitators are bringing in calls for a police state to handle the cities where it is happening. That's pages in the playbook to further control of a said free country.

posted on Nov, 15 2016 @ 10:01 PM
a reply to: justneo

One would assume he would see the violence at these places and speak out against it and tell everyone that if they wish to protest do it the proper way, not by standing in the middle of the roads effecting peoples day to day lives(also alot of people still have to work and do things at night too)

Do you know what would be even more awesome? If they all just went home and took a cold shower. There is no such thing as a perfect president and there will never be single person that is capable of leading an entire nation that prides itself on individuality and freedom of expression.

Nothing can stably exist without balance and the ability to compromise under the will of the people. The displacement of power over oneself has been shifted to make it appear as if we're in control, but have only been convinced that we are the most free slave of our time.

posted on Nov, 15 2016 @ 10:07 PM
What they are is a good reason for me to re-join the Guard after 20 years. It would give me an uncommon amount of joy to drop some window breakers.

posted on Nov, 15 2016 @ 10:20 PM
a reply to: justneo

Its all coming from the msm, the left wing media corporations

Have you ever considered this? To the left of conservative is liberal. To the left of liberal is socialist. To the left of socialist is Communist. As far as I know, this is a generally accepted scale.

From my understanding of this scale, the farther we go to the left, the major differentiation between their philosophies is their relationship to capitalism. Liberals accept capitalism, socialists to a much smaller degree and Communists not at all. Or at least that is the theory . When we look at the conservative side of the scale, there is no disavowment of capitalism at all. So basically the main economic philosophies, the economic engines of these perspectives is to what degree they either accept or reject capitalism.

So, when we look at the main stream media, what do we find. We find major corporations that embrace the practice of capitalism. They are corporate enterprises that seek one thing primarily. Financial profit. They use their profits from last year to help insure their profits for this year and this year's for next years.

Do we ever see the msm condemning capitalism? No, because it is their bread and butter. So in this observation, this line of demarcation, capitalism or no capitalism, the msm falls clearly on the right of the spectrum, right along with the Democratic Party.

new topics

top topics

log in