It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


PREVENTING THE FOURTH REICH Chapter 3: The 'Patriarchy' is REAL

page: 1

log in

+8 more 
posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:07 PM


PROLOGUE: Is there a 'Nazi' lurking inside of YOU?

CHAPTER 1: Human Vs. Nature (Intro to Self-Deception & Brutality)
CHAPTER 2: Politics as a Sadomasochistic (BDSM) Spectator Sport

CHAPTER 3: The 'Patriarchy' is REAL

I always have in mind many various big 'expose' ideas, and three I will cover as one here are "Globalism: The Religion of Big Multinational Corporatism", "The mass scale Social Group Warfare (SGW) agenda", as well as "The "Patriarchy" is REAL (but it isn't what 'they' say it is)". I'll lead in with a sort of "Globalism Vs. Globalization Vs. Multiculturalism Vs. the Global Village Vs. Global Government" approach, on the way to describing 'who' and 'what' the real "Patriarchy" really is, and why everyone on Earth should care. For this series I have in mind over a dozen socio/psychological pieces that might ought to come before this, but this one is ready to go, and from this point I'll be able to define things in terms of the knowledge herein.

Below you will find much material that will come off as being "conspiracy theory". Do note that "the Patriarchy" notion itself is a bonafide conspiracy theory, and a very young one at that (at least compared to the longstanding 'conspiracy theories' of the true 'Patriarchy'. Therefore, if you already believe in this whole "Patriarchy" conspiracy theory then you are by definition already a "Conspiracy Theorist". That means we belong to the same social group, a group which has long been marginalized by defenders of the true "Patriarchy".

For many years we've been seeing a multifaceted of push for "Globalization". During the 2000's I more recall seeing the phrase the "Global Village" lead-in such dialogs. Now in this decade, that term seems more passé, where "Multiculturalism" has taken its place and is 'all' the buzz now one might think.

More or less, the general premise of the above concepts aren't inherently all that bad sounding, not on their surfaces, or in their spirit. A lot of 'all that' is coming naturally following mass transit enhanced migration patterns, and ever exceedingly efficient methods of mass communications. Me, I like exotic. If everybody looked the same, we'd get tired of looking at each other, so the song goes.

Meanwhile, it's critical to understand that before all of that yummy multicultural globalization village stuff there were The Globalists, and their motives have nothing to do with all of that touchy feely gushy stuff we might perceive to be inherently in all that 'global villagery' globalization agenda. Instead, it's more about an increasing push towards a multinational corporation + world central banker design of global dominance via the authority of a world government.

This general agenda has been going on for something like a 100 years now, following the gradual collapse of Colonialism. Globalism better understood as "Neocolonialism" than any of those other concepts (which are generally spoken with overtones of openness & kindness). Do note that Colonialism was navy enhanced imperialism, which enabled global empire building, and constitutes one of the darkest annals of human history. Since the advent of mass communications 100 years ago, brute force imperialism of old is a mostly hopeless endeavor, whereas since the fall of the Nazi's & Imperial Japan it's only been acceptably possible via the sneaky Cold War, further reduced following that leaving only this notion of the American Empire being the "Benevolent Empire". All of which enabled solely by mass scale propaganda (via mass communications). Even that push for imperialism is mostly seen for what it is, except for here in the US.

All of this underscores the only real prospect for a total global empire, which is Globalism. While the idea of globalization isn't inherently bad, it in practice (by the authority figures & institutions that push for it) keeps proving to be more to the tune of a Globalist push for a global government.

Thanks to mass scale propaganda, the key 5 terms herein so far have all become interchangeable, their positives elevated while criticisms of their negatives spun as being "xenophobic", and as such are now widely adopted in much of Western Civilization and beyond. We already have the global village thanks to mass communications, transit and trade. Nobody is really complaining about all that, yet for some reason the masses have been convinced of this idea that this isn't good enough, and that we should go full bore towards a total global government.

This idea seems to be most hardy here in the US, and in the EU, despite the fact that at the federal levels in both governmental institutions, things like accountability and these governments being in touch with the will of the people about as grand a lesson in railroading as can be imagined. Therefore, the idea of adding yet more higher up layers above out working models is beyond comprehension, in my view. Add in the fact that once a global government is established, with no more independent nations to oppose it, as it evolves into being a dark system of oppression (as governments have a long historical tendency of doing), there would be o one left to oppose it. This reality is something you will never hear Globalists speak to.

Backing up, originators of the neocolonial global government push helped form the UN, and the UN has been the main fountainhead of 'global village means world government' type rhetoric in recent decades. While the overall premise of the United Nations isn't so bad, and even needed, these Globalists have been at the helm of it and essentially every world power for ages. The UN s it is is a plenty, although when you look at the types of nation member roles it has in its various committees we can already see how flawed the world government model is. One choice example is how currently Saudi Arabia is at the helm of the Human Rights Council. If you're not sure the contradiction there then I implore you to google |Saudi Arabia human rights|.

edit on 31-10-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:08 PM

Here in the US, 'both sides' of the "Two Party System" have been subservient to the elitist 'Powers That Be' for probably much longer than you've been alive. The big mega-conglomerates that own 90% of all US media (TV (all the channels not just the news), radio, print and so on) number at only six. Just 6 Globalist mega-conglomerates own essentially of the media you've been 'consuming' all of your life. The Internet has been a major game changer for the little people of Earth, yet still in terms of political and pop culture the vast majority of material that people carry on about is what flows from our loving Globalists propaganda outlets.

When you add it all up (which I've written extensively about its many facets), especially from our "American" viewpoint, this system in practice truly is the embodiment of pure evil.

It's all based entirely on lies, half-truths, distortions and omissions of how the world really works, and how to interpret all of the most important things in the "news". The lies run so deep that the "two" parties when you really get down to it are one in the same. They're both Globalist. They both push for perpetual war. They both push for radicalizing Islamic Jihad. They both push for a never ending War on Drugs (heralded by the UN). The CIA and other international intelligence agencies are the ultimate purveyors of the intentional drug trade. 'Their' actions have been and continue to be the most diabolical imaginable int he above pursuits. Governments are overthrown. Minds are molded via Social Engineering to be unwitting slaves; livestock. The atrocities due to it that are happening right this moment are beyond words.

Sure, in lip service this all isn't always the case, but in practice it always seems to prove true, and we have decades of results to prove the point, all right at our fingertips on the Internet.

They have nations at war with each other, which goes without saying. They have populations at war with themselves, which isn't really a new trend, but it's modern manifestations in just the past few years have essentially every social group (in this most diverse and free nation in human history) ready to tear each other to pieces.

Moving on, today the latest social trend is the equivalent to a sort of Social Imperialism, and is driven home across mainstream pop culture under the auspices of otherwise well meaning "Multiculturalism". It is here that free thinkers can see the true darkness underlying the Globalists ambitions. They have crafted this into this new ideology we call "Political Correctness", where they have set its followers in motion to 'naturally' undertake rewriting more or less the entire English language in codifying the Nu Speak. All to drive wedges that tear us all apart identity wise, and to stomp out individuality while enforcing new forms of censorship and thought control.

In terms of immigration, this push is bent on ramming our cultures together at an entirely unnatural pace while thought criminalizing attempts of criticizing even the most barbarically oppressive customs on the planet. This part is where the "PC" narrative completely falls apart, as Mainstream Global Islam is the worst set of cultural barbarism in terms of human rights, in particular the very ones PC people supposedly most cherish. That part just goes without saying, but where this all falls through the floor of the looney bin is how the Globalist politicians, academics and media (the fountainheads) have instilled in PC people the highest priority in protecting, nurturing and coddling said customs of barbarism to the point where criticisms of it are increasingly responded to with vicious outrage. If that doesn't paint a clear enough picture for you, then consider the proposed immigration policies being pushed by the "Democrat" leadership, where just allowing those who make it here let isn't good enough, the policy now we are to go out of way (and pay) to literally import old world Muslim's (from battle torn Syria) on the mass scale (to the tune of 600,000 over the next 4 years), while turning rabid at proposals to use major vetting measures to keep out the ones who have no interest in our multicultural Western Values. The narrative is pushed with this idea that we don't know that significant percentages of them following wont end up causing US harm following such a policy, despite the fact we have the situation in the EU as a perfect case study of how this kind of policy plays out. (For a detailed detailed look into this entire paragraph see here.) And [yvid=]nevermind[/url] how more immigrants harm job opportunities for our poorest.

The Globalists 'values' tell us that all cultures are equal, despite the fact that 'everyone' 'has always' wanted to move here and be a part of ours, at least the ones that favor Western Values. For perspective on this idea, consider the words of Dinesh D'Souza (an American immigrant from India): "If one begins with the multicultural premise that all cultures are equal, then the world as it is makes very little sense", which Thomas Sowell paraphrases his argument as "Some cultures have completely outperformed others in providing the things that all people seek: health, food, housing, security and the amenities of life." I'll add to that list liberty, and multiculturalism itself.

As with most of the perspectives herein, the regular folks that most buy into the ideals of globalization etc always seem to show a complete ignorance of the history these very same Globalists who are now the fountainheads of all this PC stuff. The globalists have long gutted the wealth of other peoples via imperialistic "Neoliberal" economic policy agendas. Too often over the past 50+ years, when such ends couldn't be achieved by political and corporatist means, then the intelligence agencies come swooping in and overthrow democratically elected governments.

The parallel history, and continuing trend is the destruction of the lands of other peoples, given the long history of "Neoconservative" style military interventions. They persist to this day, emanating from 'Globalist USA', by the very "Democrat" party that is solely responsible these days for driving this 'overall' multicultural etc ideology. That is, the Obama/Clinton administration literally proves that both "Neoiberalism" and "Neoconservatism" methods are completely interchangeable, and 'forever' the true face of both the "Republicans" and "Democrats".

This reality tends to go on overlooked by the regular folks of both sides, as each party always switches back and forth in lip service on their take of either method, from one international ordeal to the next. Yet all one has to do is take a good hard look over the timeline spoken to here, and its plain as day.

edit on 31-10-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:08 PM

While it is for now still great here (despite the decades long erosion of wealth and liberty), not everybody else inherently wants to come here nor do they inherently care for our values. Yet thanks to the above Globalist examples of international policy methodology, historically many people have ended up desperate to come here despite the ruthless things that happened to their homelands.

All of this being done in their push for open borders which will ensure perpetual "Social Group Warfare" (SGW), as I call all of this, amongst evermore populations across the globe. That is what the talking heads on TV are really saying when they talk about "open borders". This same twisted play on interpretation, this 'Elitese' language also goes for when they talk about things like "US Interests", or when they say "our freedom was attacked" (Bush on 9/11) they are more likely talking about imperialism. What freedom means to the elites when they talk about it is that; not your personal freedoms (which by the way are endlessly being eroded as a result of the very 'globalization' agendas that cause all of these ever increasing problems). This 'Elitese' 'language' is not to be confused with PC language.

And despite what the "Two Party's" have said or say now about "open borders", ultimately they both maintain the general progression in that direction. The parties are phonies. The "Republicans" are fake conservatives, while the "Democrat's" are fake liberals. And they've twisted the platforms in such ways to divide and conquer. That's old news, the old way. Today it's taken the old divide & conquer saying to all news levels by pitting all the other extra-partisan identity social groups against another in complex ways.

All of this serves to divert of course. If we're fighting each other then we cant possibly hope to rise together against them. To these ends they've adopted this so called social justice ideology which has pitted essentially every minority group (included females) against the more dominant gender of the majority race. Predictably, when assessing their doctrines, its leading to hate and major social conflict. This great most free and most diverse nation was founded by predominately white people of the Christian faith, and yet such are now being demonized as the ultimate oppressors. Demonized for the wrongs that these Globalist elitists are the ones responsible for.

They've branded said dominant gender of the majority racial group as the "Patriarchy", oddly enough. It posits that these straight white males are responsible for all of the societal level wrongs of their oppressive policies that includes the economic warfare that has caused the poverty of the minorities as well as an increasing bulk of this supposed "Patriarchy" group.

Yet there really is a "Patriarchy", except it is them, not us. Like the devil, it has many names.

What is, who are this "Patriarchy"? It's the Globalist elitist above the politicians & Two Party System, that own the national Media. They are the robber baron captains of industry; the Bankster's; the Plutocrat Oligarch's. They are Ruling Establishment. They, this 'system' are known by many names in this, which largely depend on the individual. More proper titles include the New World Order, The Powers That Be, the Global Power Elite, and so on. Some even call them the "Illuminati", although that refers to any of these sorts whom are practitioners of dark "Ancient Mystery Religions" (esoteric occultism). Their power structures and schemes of control include Electioneering, the world central banks, social engineering, Wall Street special interests, the Military Industrial Complex, the Prison Industrial Complex and countless other wicked machinations of division & deceit.

I surmise every individual has some concept of it, even if only subconsciously.

These people aren't like most of you or I. Their social identity is that of power hungry sociopaths.

They don't care about you, your family or even your social identity groups they pretend to pedestal, except for how they can use those social identities to manipulate you via state of the art mass scale social psychology techniques.

They Rule By Fear, and Smear. Their primary mechanism to these ends is their more or less global Criminal Media empire. The odds against them can become in our favor thanks to the Internet in general, and now, WikiLeaks in particular. It's pretty much all fully exposed for all the world to see if only will open your minds and take the time to look.

They mold our minds from cradle to grave via sophisticated mass scale social engineering techniques. They do it with politics, TV, radio, 'education' and other various forms of indoctrination and related 'brain washing' forms of propaganda. Essentially, everything being spewed out across all major media is propaganda. I can argue this fact for eternity.

Currently, Globalist Elites are the Real "Patriarchy", and Multiculturalism is their Scheme of Manipulation.

The total implications herein are beyond comprehension. There is 'truth' on TV but it's essentially all been distorted and/or key points omitted... at every turn. It's been going on for so long that even the majority of the talking heads transmitting it are true believers. Naturally, as after all it has 'always' been being incrementally implemented in baby steps for multiple overlapping generations.

Whatever you think you know, if you learned it from Them odds are it's heavily twisted from actual reality, if not false altogether. The warping of reality via television is subtle, ubiquitous, pervasive and persistent.

The best way to see between their combined lies is in seeing their criticisms of each other. Usually such tend to be quite accurate, while where it falls apart is their own self-assessments of the others criticisms. Too often, the same broad based criticisms of their rivals aren't much different than themselves.

More specific tells come when you look at the POTUS (president) and how the media handles them. Generally speaking, if the POTUS is a Republican you turn to CNN / NBC / ABC / CBS to get the dirt, while turning to FOX you'll get almost noting but denials usually only in response to the allegations etc from the "other side". When the POTUS seat flips over to the Democrat's, now the ball of more-truths rolls back the other way where you have to turn to FOX to have some semblance of hope of hearing what's really going on (well a lot of it anyways). There's still only so much news, and more importantly only so many perspectives you will ever hear. The way it generally plays out with the bigger picture perspectives is, the more important they are the less likely you are to ever see them on TV.


edit on 31-10-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:09 PM

Come election time, how you know who are the Globalist candidates and who are The People's candidates it by studying the theater for the ones that the party's + media try to ram down our throats, versus the ones they try to ignore (and when that doesn't work they turn to Fear & Smear).

In 2008 it was Ron Paul as a "Republican" and Dennis Kucinich as a "Democrat" who were The People's champions. This case study was especially telling as during the Primary's it was the GOP's & FOX's job to crush Ron Paul, while it was the job of the DNC & CNN / etc job to crush Dennis Kucinich. And that they did. They squashed them, they squashed us the supporters and ultimately the American People, like bugs.

This election we had another parallel case study in the form of Bernie Sanders vs. Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump vs. over a dozen Globalist GOP candidates. There was also Rand Paul, but he didn't last. In seeing Trump as the ultimate threat, the Criminal Media set its entire combined apparatus against him rather early on. It quickly became obvious they wouldn't be able to ignore and shoo him like they managed to do with Ron Paul and the gloves came off their desperate hands.

Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders crept up on Hillary's heels and nearly won. Hillary was the out and open pure Globalist who was supposed to be the shoe in. The DNC didn't even bother stacking the usual norm of about 10 candidates to debate and all that, which was unprecedented. But Bernie stepped up to spite them and caused havoc. This sent to Globalists and Hillary's campaign into total panic mode.

So in response, they pulled out another totally unprecedented playbook where they deployed organized Paid Riot Squads to the Trump rallies that led to countless atrocities. Perhaps the sickest part of all is then the Criminal Media spun all of the assaults and riots as being Trump's fault, where it was Bernie's supporters doing the crimes. Two outsiders nearly obliterated with one central organized Paid Riot Squad operation.

We have all the pieces now to see the full picture of this. It's as blatant as it has all been brazen.

So there it is. The "Patriarchy" is real, but it's not who 'they' told us it is. Instead it's them and they've proven they'll stop at nothing maintain their global democracy and spirit agenda. It's so far gone now it's beyond words. Bt we still have a chance. It's likely the final one.

I know half of the people out there don't want to hear it, but, this chance which is quite likely our last is Donald J. Trump. Who knows, he could prove to be a phoney like Obama has proven to be. (That's what I expected most of his run, until I started paying close attention to the the "Two Party's" and the Criminal Media were handling things.) We'll all need to carefully watch for this, but we also have the issue of how people tend to get too emotionally invested in their party / candidate by the time the dust settles. Therefore, in regards of all of the above, we need scores of people truly watching him that can honestly argue that they voted for him and have 'a right' to criticize in terms of this kind of greater good all above.

The FIRST Truth[/yvid]
"Freedom" = Imperialism: It's in the Language

edit on 31-10-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:14 PM
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

You better be writing a book my friend!

I have just found out about this series of threads and upon first glance it is filled with some very important information!

Exposing the pyschological manipulations our social engineers employ is quite the topic and you appear to be nailing it!

Looking forward to digesting this info


posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 11:11 PM
a reply to: elementalgrove

Roger that!

posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 11:21 PM
I you look up the tenents Nazism and fundamentalism and pair them side by side it is nearly impossible to tell the difference.

posted on Nov, 1 2016 @ 01:07 AM
The problem is not globalism but the people who are going to run it.

Going to a bad place will depend on how informed people are.

The truth is everybody can kick their asses, but what to kick when you don't know anything.

Understanding what is going on, organization, and all those things is the solution to this.

On the Development of World Power Structures - Part I

On the Development of World Power Structures - Part 2

The United States of .. Germany

edit on 1-11-2016 by nOraKat because: (no reason given)

posted on Nov, 1 2016 @ 03:28 PM

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

They Rule By Fear, and Smear. Their primary mechanism to these ends is their more or less global Criminal Media empire.

Uh huh:

Project Fear/Project Smear

The political/business/media/academic elites that targeted the Brexit vote for defeat with “Project Fear” are the same combined forces that have targeted Donald Trump with Project Smear. Following the Brexit victory, an obviously chastened Richard Haass, president of the world government-promoting, pro-EU, pro-open borders Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), commented: "For Hillary Clinton's campaign, this is something of a warning not to underestimate this disaffection, not to underestimate political and economic nationalism."

Hillary Clinton, who, while secretary of state, famously said (in the presence of her “good friend” Richard Haass) that she depended upon the CFR to tell her what to do and what to think (see video of her confession here), is obviously listening to the advice of Haass. She has flip-flopped on TPP and has sort of flip-flopped on migration-refugees. She is trying to appeal to all sides; appealing for the Hispanic/immigrant vote by supporting “comprehensive immigration reform” — the longtime code phrase for amnesty and open borders — while at the same time attempting to appeal to Middle America by insisting she intends to implement stringent vetting of refugees/immigrants. The open question is how many American voters will believe her new “public position” on open borders — and how many will believe — or be influenced by/distracted by — Project Smear.

e dit on 1-11-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

posted on Nov, 1 2016 @ 03:31 PM
Y'all gonna PISS OFF Annie...
It is a NAZI dream in this level of development...I don't know how long the corruption will last.
It has held since Industry was born.

posted on Nov, 1 2016 @ 04:14 PM
Damn - loooong but worth the read.
Thank you for posting this.

posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 09:13 PM

posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 06:46 AM

posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 06:53 AM
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Great thread, and remember the applause I just gave in light of the rest of this post

Does calling it the patriarchy sort of white wash all the very numerous and powerful women who have been complicit in these organizations and who have had a direct impact on the success of these groups?

Say for example, the Windsors or the powerful women of the Rothschild family who worked via proxy?

I certainly agree with absolutely everything else, I just find the terminology used not aproppos.


posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 07:37 AM
In approximately 48 hr the course of human history will be decided.
There are two camps, those that choose to defend the Constitution of the United States of America.
And those that choose to destroy it.


posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 10:00 AM
John Perkins: Confession of an Economic Hitman

Economic hit men (EHMs) are highly paid professionals who cheat countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars. They funnel money from the World Bank, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and other foreign "aid" organizations into the coffers of huge corporations and the pockets of a few wealthy families who control the planet’s natural resources. Their tools include fraudulent financial reports, rigged elections, payoffs, extortion, sex, and murder. They play a game as old as empire, but one that has taken on new and terrifying dimensions during this time of globalization. I should know; I was an EHM." — John Perkins, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man

Corporatocracy, is a recent term used to refer to an economic and political system controlled by corporations or corporate interests. It is most often used today as a term to describe the current economic situation in a particular country, especially the United States. This is different from corporatism, which is the organisation of society into groups with common interests. Corporatocracy as a term is often used by observers across the political spectrum.

Economist Jeffrey Sachs described the United States as a corporatocracy in The Price of Civilization (2011). He suggested that it arose from four trends: weak national parties and strong political representation of individual districts, the large U.S. military establishment after World War II, big corporate money financing election campaigns, and globalization tilting the balance away from workers.

This collective is what author C Wright Mills in 1956 called the 'power elite', wealthy individuals who hold prominent positions in corporatocracies. They control the process of determining a society's economic and political policies.

The concept has been used in explanations of bank bailouts, excessive pay for CEOs, as well as complaints such as the exploitation of national treasuries, people, and natural resources. It has been used by critics of globalization, sometimes in conjunction with criticism of the World Bank or unfair lending practices, as well as criticism of "free trade agreements".

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man - (FULL AUDIO BOOK)
An Economic Hit Man Confesses and Calls to Action | John Perkins | TEDx TEDTalks
Confessions of an Economic Hit Man: How America Really Took Over the World (2005) The Film Archives
Apologies Of An Economic Hitman (Full Documentary Movie)
John Perkins | New Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
edit on 19-12-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 08:47 PM
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

No, it's not.

posted on Feb, 15 2017 @ 08:58 PM
a reply to: reldra

You completed all that in a mere one minute, eh?
edit on 15-2-2017 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

posted on Apr, 1 2018 @ 11:49 AM
Thats an awesome OP IgnoranceIsn'tBliss!

I can't believe this thread has so few replies, easily one of the best laid out descriptions of all the different dark factors at play.

One thing I'm not sure I can agree with is your (possibly contradictory) assessment that the you can tell who the peoples candidate is by the fact they don't get much media attention and if they do, its to tear them apart. While Trump did get (and still gets) torn apart, he got more media attention than anyone.

I think its more likely that this is further social engineering in that he is a highly controversial figure more likely to create further divisions between left and right (keep us fighting each other) and getting distracted by porn stars, election meddling etc while "They" push their next phase in to action.

I could be wrong, perhaps he magically got in to office and is playing 4D chess against the deep state, but even if he did slip through the cracks of the election engineering machine, it seems like he is either getting pushed in to a corner to play ball Their way and go the way of the Dodo (or Kennedy).

One very telling thing will be his foreign policy, if he pulls out of Syria, great... but if we go to battle anywhere else, I think we've been bamboozled yet again. Korean and Iran being next up on the neo-con planning list.

posted on Apr, 1 2018 @ 02:15 PM
Per usual you nail down the concepts and organizations involved in destroying freedom worldwide.

new topics

top topics


log in