CNN's Jake Tapper Uses One Guy to Demonize Trump supporters and Deflect From Clinton Investigation

Ok. We get it. It's the Clinton News Network. And? Let people believe what they want to believe even they're being suckered. Pointing out the obvious has gotten tiresome around here.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: TheBulk

Hillary's not under investigation she never was.

a reply to: Sillyolme

I wasn't aware that ATS had expanded the ludicrous online lies forum to include the 2016 elections forum.

a reply to: TheBulk

If they planned to be anything but Clinton's propaganda machine, they could have make an easy transition with the following news :

2006 Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election

a reply to: Sillyolme

Opinions are great, when something is speculative. This isn't.

She is under investigation, Fact. You just don't want to believe it, cool.

Have fun with that.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

What do you mean why has she responded?

I don't recall.

I assert my 5th Amendment privileges.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: DBCowboy

And trolls live under bridges.

You would know better than most here obviously.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: DBCowboy

And trolls live under bridges.

How many neighbors do you have?

It does take a village and stronger together,huh?

a reply to: JinMI

You can hope but I'm afraid that's not really the case.

Even with this that you guys want to hang so much hope on. She's still going to win.

a reply to: Nucleardoom

Yeah that's cute...where were you earlier this past summer?

When I was on here every day saying she wasn't going to be indicted ?

( and I was right.
I'm right now too. )
Why anyone would think that these emails are any different than the others is beyond me.
How do you come to any other conclusion?
That's a big shark to jump.

More importantly they aren't going to know anything before election day .
And new info gets out every day.
They had this weeks ago, they needed a warrant to search so they haven't even seen what is or isn't there.
Occams razor.says it's more of the same nothing stuff.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Sorry but why do you think mine is opinion and yours is fact?
Oh that's right...it's what you think that matters.

Sorry maybe in another world babe.

I'm dealing with the same info as you.
You go in a different direction.

Who's really speculating here?

What happened in July?


Yup.

a reply to: TDawg61

I do know better than everyone.
I've seen em.

a reply to: Sillyolme

That is your opinion. Not based in fact. Looks like shes up by 2 at the time of this post. Funny..wasn't she up by 12 little over a week ago????

Tick tock, drip , drip.

What fun facts will come to bite Hilly next?

Lots of pointless deflection and spamming from one particular member in this thread.

If I read the OP properly, it's supposed to be about CNN's shenanigans, and not Hillary's investigation.

So, about CNN's shenanigans, it's just more of the same we've seen for months, years in fact. I'm not sure why anyone expects much else from the globalist mouthpiece

a reply to: Ohanka

No one gave Tapper the memo that the media is pulling out.

That guy looked like a shill. Call me a crazy conspiracy theorist but the guy in the video seemed to have a lot of Scott foVal characterics. I believe he was a paid shill. But even if he wasn't. What difference does one crazy at a trump rally make anyways.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Sorry but why do you think mine is opinion and yours is fact?
Oh that's right...it's what you think that matters.

Sorry maybe in another world babe.

I'm dealing with the same info as you.
You go in a different direction.

Who's really speculating here?

What happened in July?


Yup.

When the government says someone is under investigation, you can have an opinion about the investigation.

But going around saying there isn't one is just false. That's not an opinion, it's just false. Sorry.

You could also have an opinion that the surface of the sun is below freezing. But that would also be false.