Bill Clinton's "son" Cut from You tube, OOPS turned back on You Tube

Looks like Trump has got the people who benefit off the status quo really nervous. Sounds like the only thing that got this man his "electronic voice" back was public outcry.

YouTube on Wednesday terminated the account of Danney Williams, the 30-year-old man who has claimed since the 1990s to be the black son of former President Bill Clinton.

But YouTube suddenly reversed its decision on Thursday amid public outcry and reinstated the account in the early morning hours, posting a notice that said only: “After a review of your account, we have confirmed that your YouTube account is not in violation of our Terms of Service. As such, we have unsuspended your account.

Danny Williams said his mother was "with" Bill 13 times and she was a working girl who has substance abuse problems. I don't know if I believe the story. You tube must have thought there was something to it and wanted it shut down. He published a video called Banished last week and it got 1.2 million views. Can't have that

The YouTube decision to terminate Williams’ account blocked the nine-minute feature “BANISHED – The Untold Story of Danney Williams,” which had received 1.2 million views since Williams posted it last week. Read more at www.wnd.com...

The You tube ban was in vein, the video showed up in multiple other sites and electronic media. So this and the public out cry about censorship from a popular electronic medium was maybe a pushing factor to get his channel back.

Twitter also continued to allow Williams to post the “Banished” video on Danney Williams’ page, but the Twitter link to YouTube displayed the message: “This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated. Sorry about that.” Read more at www.wnd.com...

I have never seen such one sided media electioneering in a presidential campaign. Freedom of the press is a keystone to our freedom. Editorials belong in that section of the paper or website.

This man Danny Williams must has the status quo really worried that he may make people take pause and think for a moment. If Trump wins the election some of their free goodies they buy from status quo politicians maybe going away. That is why I like the idea of Trump sitting in the oval office.

www.wnd.com...

a reply to: seasonal

A DNA test would clear this right up.
since the nineties huh? And no tests have been done?
Need a bridge?

a reply to: seasonal

I don't get why they don't just get a paternity test besides the taint David Pecker one. They are trying to link Trump and Pecker (lol) now, but back when they procured the rag in 1999 he was in with the Clinton's via Altman.

The investment group, Evercore Capital Partners L.L.C., headed by former Deputy Treasury Secretary Roger C. Altman, announced yesterday that it had acquired the publications for $294 million from American Media Inc., and that David J. Pecker, the president and chief executive officer of Hachette Filipacchi Magazines, a unit of Lagardere Group, would head the company and receive an equity stake. American Media is a public company whose two biggest stockholders are the venture capital firm Boston Ventures and MacFadden Holdings Inc.

Source

Who is Altman?

Roger Charles Altman (born April 2, 1946)[1] is an American investment banker, the founder and executive chairman of Evercore, and a former Democratic politician. He served as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Carter administration from January 1977 until January 1981 and as Deputy Secretary of the Treasury in the Clinton administration from January 1993 until he resigned in August 1994, amid the Whitewater controversy.[2]

Source

A Clinton ally is who Altman is.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: seasonal

A DNA test would clear this right up.
since the nineties huh? And no tests have been done?
Need a bridge?

seems like that would be the wise thing to do. Unless.........

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: seasonal

A DNA test would clear this right up.
since the nineties huh? And no tests have been done?
Need a bridge?

Danney Williams says it is common knowledge in Arkansas that he is Bill Clintons son. Bill Clinton had an affair with his mother, and he was conceived. For many years, Bill Clinton sent $700 each month to his mother, and also sent Christmas gifts to him each year. Danney Williams has asked for a DNA test to prove this for many years, yet the Clinton's refuse. IN fact, the Clintons falsely said a DNA test has already been run. However Danney Williams says no test was ever run

Produced by filmmaker Joel Gilbert, it drew nearly 100,000 views per day and more than 1,000 viewer comments, with the overwhelming majority expressing support for Williams and outrage at the Clintons for not being willing to allow a DNA test to determine paternity.

From the cited source

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: seasonal

A DNA test would clear this right up.
since the nineties huh? And no tests have been done?
Need a bridge?

Because no one is going to stick Bill with a needle. Untouchable

a reply to: Sillyolme

The test came up negative. Shouldn't stop the search for the truth though!

a reply to: Sillyolme

A DNA test would clear this right up. since the nineties huh? And no tests have been done? Need a bridge?

Yes, get a simple DNA test. We (FBI) can't even get his wife's e-mail crap straight. Can you imagine a former POTUS giving a DNA sample?

Bridge built and burned.

a reply to: Tjoran

Because no one is going to stick Bill with a needle. Untouchable

Correct

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Sillyolme

A DNA test would clear this right up. since the nineties huh? And no tests have been done? Need a bridge?

Yes, get a simple DNA test. We (FBI) can't even get his wife's e-mail crap straight. Can you imagine a former POTUS giving a DNA sample?

Bridge built and burned.

Bu-bu-but they already tested him against a sample of Bill's DNA.

www.allenbwest.com...

Negative.

a reply to: xuenchen

Danney Williams says it is common knowledge in Arkansas that he is Bill Clintons son. Bill Clinton had an affair with his mother, and he was conceived. For many years, Bill Clinton sent $700 each month to his mother, and also sent Christmas gifts to him each year. Danney Williams has asked for a DNA test to prove this for many years, yet the Clinton's refuse. IN fact, the Clintons falsely said a DNA test has already been run. However Danney Williams says no test was ever run

Imagine just for a teen-see moment if this were Bush or Trump instead of Clinton who had the baby daddy thing. Oh this would be wall to wall CNN, FOX etc 24/7 Danny Williams til the election, again if this were Bush (who I thought was a horrible pres) or Trump.

a reply to: imjack

The test came up negative. Shouldn't stop the search for the truth though!

source?

a reply to: imjack

In 1999, The Star magazine paid Bobbie Ann Williams for her son’s blood samples. Supposedly the magazine compared the results of the tests with the FBI analysis of the president’s blood in the report by Kenneth Starr, the independent prosecutor (who was using the blood samples to match the DNA on Monica Lewinsky’s dress “stain.”) The Star’s test was negative. However… Ether Zone says, To this day the FBI will not say that its lab report accurately portrays President Clinton’s DNA profile, or whether that profile may have been altered in documents released to the House Judiciary Committee for reasons of national security or privacy. If Clinton’s DNA was in any way camouflaged in the report, The Star’s test would have been inaccurate anyway.

This would not get friend of the court to assign Clinton a child support payment, sorry not proof of father.

www.allenbwest.com...

a reply to: seasonal

Type Danny Willams Negative DNA into Google. Only 1.6 million different options.

a reply to: seasonal

I'll try to ask my question as straight forward as possible:

What?

a reply to: imjack

I'll try to ask my question as straight forward as possible: What?

There is an entire paragraph there, where did we loose you?

a reply to: imjack

Bu-bu-but they already tested him against a sample of Bill's DNA.

www.allenbwest.com...

Negative.

Huh??? Inconclusive; not negative. From your source:

In 1999, The Star magazine paid Bobbie Ann Williams for her son’s blood samples. Supposedly the magazine compared the results of the tests with the FBI analysis of the president’s blood in the report by Kenneth Starr, the independent prosecutor (who was using the blood samples to match the DNA on Monica Lewinsky’s dress “stain.”) The Star’s test was negative.

As far as I can tell, that actual analysis of that "comparison" has never been made public; just their "conclusion." Nor has it ever been independently verified/confirmed.

However… Ether Zone says, To this day the FBI will not say that its lab report accurately portrays President Clinton’s DNA profile, or whether that profile may have been altered in documents released to the House Judiciary Committee for reasons of national security or privacy. If Clinton’s DNA was in any way camouflaged in the report, The Star’s test would have been inaccurate anyway.

That's just one issue with the supposed test done... Here's another, also from your source:

Noted Connecticut criminologist Dr. Henry Lee told the New York Daily News that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) that the FBI used to match Clinton’s DNA to the stain on Monica Lewinsky’s dress would be inadequate to prove paternity in the Danny Williams case. “You can use the PCR test to exclude President Clinton or to say he could be (Danny’s father).”

So we still don’t know the truth.

The questionable source for these claims (a tabloid rag whose owner had close political ties with Clinton) is also an issue.

Even Snopes concurs with the above and declares the claim "unproven," not "false."

No definitive and conclusive DNA paternity test has been done.

ETA: This is a pretty good article on the whole sordid affair for anyone interested: Danney Williams , Bill Clinton And Their DNA

Can't they use Monica's dress to obtain a DNA sample or has that been destroyed now?

Failing that get hold of Bill's hairbrush.

Failing that, a honey trap.

a reply to: Cobaltic1978

In 1999, The Star magazine paid Bobbie Ann Williams for her son’s blood samples. Supposedly the magazine compared the results of the tests with the FBI analysis of the president’s blood in the report by Kenneth Starr, the independent prosecutor (who was using the blood samples to match the DNA on Monica Lewinsky’s dress “stain.”) The Star’s test was negative.

The tests were incoclusive because they had to be.

Failing that get hold of Bill's hairbrush.

Failing that, a honey trap.

No one will get a hair brush, tooth brush or any other sample that would be considered positive proof. And if you did get a sample I think it would be a hazardous, fool hardy adventure sure to end poorly for the collector, their family and maybe friends and the mailman too.

Honey trap would be a bad idea, see sentence above.