It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: scojak
I've shown complete respect for women this entire tread
I disagree.
Her womanhood has nothing to do with it.
The first American "black" president was illegitimatized as a non-American
, foreign born,
secret Muslim communist,
married to a man
and born of a white woman,
who will go down as the "Worst president ever" that failed because of his health care reform policy.
How does that taint the office for the next "black" president?
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar
and how do you get the little girl with the math book safely to school with a bunch of religious wackos around waiting to throw acid in her face?
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: windword
but the op seems to be saying that we should vote for a candidate that doesn't really give much evidence at all that he is qualified for the position than risk a hillary failure.
only women didn't get to the position we are in today by avoiding such risks, why should we start now?
Then please quote me and show exactly where I said something that disrespected women.
Prove that
Do you really have to ask? It's called a stereotype.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: scojak
It's the whole premise of this thread. It's insulting to women, and the fact that you don't get that speaks volumes to your unawareness.
Prove that.
Prove what? That that's the racist rhetoric going about?
Try as you might, Barack Obama doesn't fit a stereotype.
Obama broke a kind of "glass ceiling" if its own. He was destine to bear the brunt of ignorant bigotry, and so is Hillary Clinton.
It won't stop her, and it won't stop women from voting for her, any more than it will stop blacks, minorities, or anyone else really, from electing another black president.
And if you truly believe Hillary will be an amazing president (feminism aside), then, by all means, give her your vote.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: scojak
I put forth an argument about the negative impact that Hillary could likely have on women's rights.
Wait what? Which rights?
You're saying that people are stereotyping and voting based on gender and/or race.
...And race relations haven't been worse since the Civil Rights movement...
Prove (per your own words) that Obama, "The first American "black" president was illegitimatized as a non-American, foreign born, secret Muslim communist, married to a man"
And if you don't think people will look at Hillary differently than every President before her based on the fact that she is a women, then you really are blind to a huge problem in our society.
Women's rights, it says it right there. More so women equality, but that falls into women's rights.
I feel like a kindergarten teacher right now trying to keep a bunch of toddlers in line.
However, if Trump wins, he will probably destroy any current positive perceptions of men in office. Should he win, after this extremely scandal-ridden campaign, I have no doubt he will continue to struggle with his past, present and future indiscretions. Any and all of his failures will be nationally known, so if he does not do a sparkling job with the presidency, there will be a skyrocket in stereotypes that say men are unfit for official positions. Looking at the long-term, I think electing him is really going to have negative repercussions for gender equality.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: scojak
No, I'm saying that that is what you're saying.
That's a bunch of (Republican) election hype. I don't believe that for a second!
What?! This is the meme that Barack Obama has had to deal with, because he is our first African American president. Do you deny it? Hillary, if elected, will also have to deal with all kinds of lies and stereotypical memes. So what?
The reasons that Hillary Clinton is being criticized and categorized as "unfit to hold office" have nothing to do with feminine or womanly issues.
If anything, she's proving that she/women can be just a cunning, corrupt and crooked as any male politician
She raises the bar for all women to be allowed to smile less,
wear pants more often
and be as nasty and calculating to our opponents as any man can.
And if you don't think people will look at Hillary differently than every President before her based on the fact that she is a women, then you really are blind to a huge problem in our society.
They'll look at a President Hillary Clinton not much differently than they looked at Hillary Clinton the Congresswoman, Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State, or Hillary Clinton, Democratic Presidential nominee.
We've already seen whatever ramification of a female Hillary Clinton and we lived through it.
We'll live through a female President Hillary Clinton too.
History won't blame any Hillary Clinton Administration shortcomings on her womanhood!
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: scojak
Like the right to reproductive choices?
What rights will women lose with her as president?
What rights have blacks lost with Obama as president?
Do you think a female President Clinton will send women, barefoot and pregnant, back to the kitchen to make sandwiches? That's insulting! Sorry, it just it!
originally posted by: scojak
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: scojak
a reply to: Black_Fox
If only... unfortunately we are stuck between a crock and an orange face.
Wonder what would happen.........
If everyone who said they wish they had a better choice, (which they do its called third party) ACTUALLY voted 3rd party.....
I bet you a peradime shift would happen......
"It will never happen" yeah because YOU NEVER MAKE IT HAPPEN!
Ugh, this old shtick. "Let's all think about what would happen if everyone did something and then blame the individuals for that not happening." Sheesh, give me a break.
My single vote is not going to change anything, so yes, it will never happen.
I'm not going to go be an activist because I honestly think it's a waste of time. People won't change their minds when presented with logical alternatives, so yes, it will never happen.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: scojak
and, I am getting the feeling that I am talking to a trump supporter who has come up with one of the lamest excuses ever as to why women shouldn't be voting for hillary!