It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WikiLeaks Verified account @wikileaks @ChristopherJM @RT_com No they didn't. The release was visible to anyone looking at __._/podesta-emails … well before our first tweet.
RT breaking the latest Podesta emails before WikiLeaks sparked accusations of collusion with the whistleblowing organization. Actually, no conspiracies were involved – just good journalism.
Despite the documents being public when discovered by RT, accusations soon began that it was proof that Russia and WikiLeaks are somehow working together. Christopher Miller, a journalist for the US government-backed Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, set the wheels of suspicion in motion.
Gotta love it. A conspiracy about state-controlled media from state-controlled media denouncing conspiracy theories.
originally posted by: primespickle
No.
People noticed that Wikileaks uploaded new files and wrote about it before Wikileaks tweeted about the updates.
The same thing happened here on ATS.
This ATS post was published at 1:15 PM, but Wikileaks didn't tweet about the new email leaks until 1:57 PM.
originally posted by: primespickle
The same thing happened here on ATS.
This ATS post was published at 1:15 PM, but Wikileaks didn't tweet about the new email leaks until 1:57 PM.
Editing to add: I noticed this because I was confused at how the OP in the other thread knew about the Podesta10 emails. I follow Wikileaks on Twitter and they didn't mention it (at the time of the thread). Then I learned that you can view the file upload date on Wikileaks so that is how people knew. I guess there are people that just refresh those Wikileaks pages to check for changes.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: theantediluvian
does this mean that all the documents are fabricated ?