Could Hillary take us to WWIII?

WikiLeaks exposed this little gem:

Hillary Clinton privately said the US would “ring China with missile defense” if the Chinese government failed to curb North Korea’s nuclear program, a potential hint at how the former secretary of state would act if elected president.
Clinton’s remarks were revealed by WikiLeaks in a hack of the Clinton campaign chairman’s personal account. The emails include a document excerpting Clinton’s private speech transcripts, which she has refused to release.

Sounds like Hillary has her own version of A WALL.

Indian Express

At least Trump doesn't plan on a wall of missiles!

This lunatic Hillary sounds very dangerous!

China was angry when we said that we would ring North Korea with missiles because of their continued testing of missiles and nuclear weapons.... Hillary wants to ring China!

a reply to: butcherguy

It's not 'Hillary'. Why do people keep saying this?

She does not say a single thing the establishment doesn't want, being the establishment candidate.

That should scare people more than this lizard like woman. It's a mindset that permeates the CIA, the FBI, the office of the president and the military industry. This is NOT one persons dream, it's a collection of ideas from various people in power, with an agreement that they'll save each other. This is, in my view, the end times.

The power in office is now forcing their will, carte-blanche across vast swathes of the public domain, unchallenged and completely immune to prosecution.

This world was over a while back and we're now catching up. If it's not war it will be civil war, if it's not civil war it will be an economic crisis. The hubris of powerful men.....

a reply to: Joneselius

It's not 'Hillary'. Why do people keep saying this?

I say it because the words came from her lips, she represents the establishment and her name is the one on the ballot.

a reply to: butcherguy

But you say it as a singular entity. She isn't.

It's not Hillary in that regard, it's 'the establishment'. Hillary is a TOTAL echo chamber. She makes ZERO difference to anything going on, nothing at all. Her name is on the ballots but so is.......... I shudder to say it......Trumps.....

This is an absolute affront to common sense and logic. The words she speaks are written down.......By someone else... Let's discuss THOSE people.

a reply to: butcherguy

The 8 ball says " The chances are good"

There was one email that she said the Iran deal was a huge mistake and the next potus will be picking up the pieces of the mideast after a nuke war!

Didn't she say the deal would stop Iran's nuke program without firing a shot? Like just last week?

So, China. check

Russia, check.

Iran, check.

Open borders, check.

Alienate the US population, check.

oh and more food stamps will be good for the economy.

yeah, that'll pay for the millions more that will get free health ins!

Insane, wake up peoples!

Can't let her get in the WH.

The reason for a peaceful protest falls off the cultural radar and the divisive groups are the ones getting the press. The peaceful protests are nearly completely ignored. America then focuses and then obsesses over the political implications of what has happened and the images of violence. The actors and those proficient in playing to the cameras that are rolling know full well what they are doing and it appears they create a self-defeating abstract that send a clear message to the public. They will do something abhorrent, they will do something drastic, they will stop traffic, stop the buses, stop the trains, burn down buildings because when they do, they know the public loses respect for those who chose to peacefully protest and the issue of scorn becomes more important than the issue of injustice. This creates an America that becomes devoid of care, empathy or concern for why the protests happen. The issue is the criminality of what is happening and not the original reason for the revolt. Protesters are now thugs and it is pejorative that sticks because the media fails to bring forward the concerns and impunity of the leadership and instead, vilifies those who have a real concern for the violation of human rights and the lack of constitutionality.

The images that play out on the nightly news are simply abstract images and they burn into our minds the idea that anyone who decides to protest or riot will be connected to images of looters, and even though the so called liberal media pretends to be racially sensitive – most of the images of looters we see on the nightly news are often African American—even though we know that there are all sorts of races that commit crimes in the heat of the moment. Once again it is theater — theater to build an agenda. The agenda is simple – if the protests are just senseless riots and looting, then nothing is actually wrong with the country and nothing needs to change. Yes, the media is fully aware that Black Lives Matter, but only when they put them in the spotlight kicking in windows and breaking down doors. It is a non sequitur that mimics Orwellian newspeak, but with images and abstracts that amount to nothing more than street theater that presents an argument whose conclusion does not follow from its premise. It strokes the terrified and indignant of America – it hardens the resolve of the police state and turns victimization into a cottage industry. Martin Luther King once wrote that “A riot is the language of the unheard,” when no one pays attention to peaceful protests, that anger, despair, and rage will boil over into violence.

But most of the protestors, in the beginning are still non-violent. But the violent performance is all theater – no one notices or cares about the peaceful protesters caught in the crossfire of rubber bullets and pepper spray provoked by those who are considered agents provocateur. A “Revolution” may aim at overthrowing a “State.” But the insurrection and all its controlled opposition groups have to agree on a target which is not a divisive idea that is covertly the media’s flavor of the week which enslaves us with our own fears and nightmares about power, impunity and impotent leadership. We are now opening ourselves up to voluntary bigotry and prejudice over the war of images. This needs to be understood. The media is playing up to the controlled opposition and so are those who take to social media to basically call the protesters idiots, thugs and miscreants. To be objective about the controlled demolition of this country is difficult especially when the spectacle has a sophisticated structure, and the structure has joints, crossings, patterns, and is multi-leveled. Most people don’t want to boil down crowd think to a science – but the leadership has, the politicians have, and the media has excelled in presenting a reality show that is capped with angry politicians tossing the issue around like political footballs—never really giving solutions.

The truth is, the solution is always police overreach and more attention to the controlled opposition. How can we win when we fight hate with more hate — when abstract images are being used as agitprop to ensure a future of a well-organized police state? It’s a shame that the ones with the loudest voices are the ones who are, whether intentional or not, causing more separation. It is unfortunate that organized groups take credit for all the tension because they have well-trained actors who play the game and know how to manipulate the media. It is not a contest of whose oppression is more important. It is not a question of whose life is more valuable. The organized chaos is now an enabling environment for all sorts of nightmares and failures. The conspiracy should you choose to accept it, is planned controlled chaos that will eventually result in the federalization of the police and an even broader world concern for city wide insurgence as we are about to elect a new president. All of this controlled will be used to justify the taking away local and state control over police departments and put it in the hands of the already highly- centralized federal government. At this point, more than 30 police departments across the nation have fallen under federal oversight following mass civil unrest, Department of Justice lawsuits, or threats to cut federal grants. Following the Dallas police shootings, President Obama called for more federal oversight of America’s police. How predictable was that move?

Is the overall goal here chaos and homegrown terror in order to eliminate all police? Do these controlled opposition groups really know what their ultimate goal is? I highly doubt they are aware that the outcome of their organized theater will result in a harsh upgrade of tactical units which can be used to eliminate those who are rebelling against some lofty undefined goal. While the epidemic of increased police violence and shootings is a serious issue that does need to change, twisting these events through manufactured civil unrest to justify federalized control of police will centralize the power in even fewer hands and in the new police state, the media will abandon Black Lives Matter for better theater – and rest assured, it will be a theater of pain and one where no lives will matter in an out of control police state. BEWARE OF THE BOULE SOCIETY IN 2016-2017

OCTOBER 14, 2016

originally posted by: Joneselius
a reply to: butcherguy

But you say it as a singular entity. She isn't.

It's not Hillary in that regard, it's 'the establishment'. Hillary is a TOTAL echo chamber. She makes ZERO difference to anything going on, nothing at all. Her name is on the ballots but so is.......... I shudder to say it......Trumps.....

This is an absolute affront to common sense and logic. The words she speaks are written down.......By someone else... Let's discuss THOSE people.

Do you have names and documentation.
If she represents them, she will do just fine as a surrogate.

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Joneselius
a reply to: butcherguy

But you say it as a singular entity. She isn't.

It's not Hillary in that regard, it's 'the establishment'. Hillary is a TOTAL echo chamber. She makes ZERO difference to anything going on, nothing at all. Her name is on the ballots but so is.......... I shudder to say it......Trumps.....

This is an absolute affront to common sense and logic. The words she speaks are written down.......By someone else... Let's discuss THOSE people.

Do you have names and documentation.
If she represents them, she will do just fine as a surrogate.

Surrogate?

More like an avatar. lol and an ugly one too.

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Joneselius

It's not 'Hillary'. Why do people keep saying this?

I say it because the words came from her lips, she represents the establishment and her name is the one on the ballot.

And if you vote for her or the other douchebag, and they start WWIII the blood will be on your hands T00!

originally posted by: HUMBLEONE

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Joneselius

It's not 'Hillary'. Why do people keep saying this?

I say it because the words came from her lips, she represents the establishment and her name is the one on the ballot.

And if you vote for her or the other douchebag, and they start WWIII the blood will be on your hands T00!

Iran is already moving ships to Yemen.

We traded shots with their chumps who fired at us.

What ingrates, after all that money obama gave them.

The problem is, is that the entire establishment is pulling all the strings of those in power so that they can usher in their little anti-christ.

If all 500 million elitists (Georgian Stones) are not wiped out soon, then they will soon successfully eradicate the remaining 6.5 billion.

Either way, Hellary or Thumpton, it does not matter because either way it will be fast death via war with Russia/China or slow Hunger Games death via Thumptons great prison wall.

The only way out off prison West world is to have faith in Jesus Christ. All other option are now screwed to hell.

Yahweh/Lucifer/Allah/El wants his blood sacrifice ASAP.

The people in charge are already starting WW3- and as long as their established puppets are the ones sitting around up top, nobody is going to even try and stop it.

That being said, Hillary *could* "lead" us to WW3, but then, so could anyone else- we could elect a cat to the big chair and the current direction of things would lead us into WW3.
It would take someone great who had the support of the people to actually stop it at this point- so I'd say you might as well accept it- the war drums are beating and 'murka is gearing up for another full on war- and this time, we're not going to win.

They'll use the war as a scapegoat to let the fiat monetary system fall apart (since it's going to in the next few years anyway) and then bring in sweeping dictatorial changes. A new centrally controlled currency, a lot more surveillance, a lot less freedom. Manufacturing and sale of firearms to the public will be wiped out, as all weapons and ammo will go to the "war effort". They may even begin confiscation of civilian weapons under this claim- and anyone who resists will be shot as a traitor, since wartime rules are fun like that. There won't be an uprising- anyone able or willing to fight will be drafted and shipped overseas to their intentional deaths. That helps with overpopulation as well as keeping the new us government safe from the citizens under its feet.

War is coming- and we're going to get to see first hand what it's really like.

originally posted by: HUMBLEONE

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Joneselius

It's not 'Hillary'. Why do people keep saying this?

I say it because the words came from her lips, she represents the establishment and her name is the one on the ballot.

And if you vote for her or the other douchebag, and they start WWIII the blood will be on your hands T00!

That makes it tough for the common citizen, doesn't it?

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Joneselius

It's not 'Hillary'. Why do people keep saying this?

I say it because the words came from her lips, she represents the establishment and her name is the one on the ballot.

Still a puppet though.
You can sift through the emails that were never deleted and got hacked and she gives penance to Lady Rothschild for not delivering on a promise.
She serves the NWO and the Globalist agenda but is she a power mad money hungry lunatic that craves her own totalitarian distopia where she is the loon ball in charge?.........For sure!

The silence from the usual Hillary backers is deafening.

They know she's leading us to war and they like it.

Scary what mainstream liberals have become. Scary and sad.

What is it with the WW3 fetish around here? It never ends. No, WW3 is not coming anytime soon. The US always uses missile defense threats to get states to do what they want. We have been doing since Reagan and Star Wars. The day is coming that the US will be able remove nuclear threats to itself. And on that day being nuclear power will no longer mean anything. And for nations like China and Russia that is a great fear.

originally posted by: MrSpad
What is it with the WW3 fetish around here? It never ends. No, WW3 is not coming anytime soon. The US always uses missile defense threats to get states to do what they want. We have been doing since Reagan and Star Wars. The day is coming that the US will be able remove nuclear threats to itself. And on that day being nuclear power will no longer mean anything. And for nations like China and Russia that is a great fear.

Trump has ended any credibility for himself on his own merits; fear-mongering about Clinton is all some have left.

Your knowledgeable comments, by the way, are always appreciated.

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: HUMBLEONE

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Joneselius

It's not 'Hillary'. Why do people keep saying this?

I say it because the words came from her lips, she represents the establishment and her name is the one on the ballot.

And if you vote for her or the other douchebag, and they start WWIII the blood will be on your hands T00!

Iran is already moving ships to Yemen.

We traded shots with their chumps who fired at us.

What ingrates, after all that money obama gave them.

These are sociopaths we are dealing with, our so call "leaders". It hard for folks like us to wrap our head around them but they have no sense of empathy or compassion. Its all about them. They have no sense of patriotism or loyalty. To manipulate a situation so that millions of people would die would be a charge to them. They would giggle with glee at the death of millions because THEY had exercised their perverted sense of power.

originally posted by: MrSpad
What is it with the WW3 fetish around here? It never ends. No, WW3 is not coming anytime soon. The US always uses missile defense threats to get states to do what they want. We have been doing since Reagan and Star Wars. The day is coming that the US will be able remove nuclear threats to itself. And on that day being nuclear power will no longer mean anything. And for nations like China and Russia that is a great fear.

Such an upbeat pep talk, but there is more than one way to deliver a nuke.