It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
Ok.
*Anyone with moderate intelligence who watched the debate knows that he failed.
Maybe you don't know that.
Hmm, I was going to give a serious response, but I will opt for the joke instead.
So you admit that you have just moderate intelligence. Well me and all of my superior high intelligence friends thought Trump won.
originally posted by: imjack
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Grambler
Both sides of the MSM distort polls heavily. What would be interesting to see is the average of an equal amount of left and right news organizations. That would probably give us the closest true numbers.
But Trump won, imo. For the sole reason that his campaign was hanging on a thread and he bounced back high from that debate.
Too bad polls don't matter.
www.realclearpolitics.com...
You see this electorate map that does?
Clinton needs 10 electorates to win. Trump needs 105.
Basic math-
Trump has only been 1 point ahead of Clinton the entire race in Florida. Pennsylvania he's behind by 8 points. 6 points in MN, 3 points in NC, and if he loses ANY of these states it's a Clinton sweep.
If Clinton won 8 more electorates there won't even be 270 for Donald to Collect.
originally posted by: BiffWellington
originally posted by: underwerks
Not saying I trust polls, but I can understand why people would think Hillary won. Not everybody gets Trumps rambling word salad with no specific answers about anything.
What do you mean? He was asked a question about his purported fisting of unsuspecting women, and he gave a perfectly straightforward and unrelated answer about ISIS.
I don't see the problem.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: imjack
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Grambler
Both sides of the MSM distort polls heavily. What would be interesting to see is the average of an equal amount of left and right news organizations. That would probably give us the closest true numbers.
But Trump won, imo. For the sole reason that his campaign was hanging on a thread and he bounced back high from that debate.
Too bad polls don't matter.
www.realclearpolitics.com...
You see this electorate map that does?
Clinton needs 10 electorates to win. Trump needs 105.
Basic math-
Trump has only been 1 point ahead of Clinton the entire race in Florida. Pennsylvania he's behind by 8 points. 6 points in MN, 3 points in NC, and if he loses ANY of these states it's a Clinton sweep.
If Clinton won 8 more electorates there won't even be 270 for Donald to Collect.
Umm, how do you think the decided who is winning each state? I will give you a hint. You said they don't matter. Oh thats right, polls.
How can you say polls don't matter and then go on to say Trump is a point ahead here or clinton is 8 up there. Those are all from polls.
originally posted by: WilburnRoach
I really hope Hillary offers Trump a tissue in the next debate.
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
Anyone who watched the debate knows that he failed.
Geez, I watched, and I don't know that.
Ok.
*Anyone with moderate intelligence who watched the debate knows that he failed.
Maybe you don't know that.
originally posted by: paradoxious
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
Anyone who watched the debate knows that he failed.
Geez, I watched, and I don't know that.
Ok.
*Anyone with moderate intelligence who watched the debate knows that he failed.
Maybe you don't know that.
Well, there's the truth. Those of "moderate" intelligence knows he failed.
Those with more than moderate intelligence, like myself, didn't know that.
originally posted by: BiffWellington
originally posted by: underwerks
Not saying I trust polls, but I can understand why people would think Hillary won. Not everybody gets Trumps rambling word salad with no specific answers about anything.
What do you mean? He was asked a question about his purported fisting of unsuspecting women, and he gave a perfectly straightforward and unrelated answer about ISIS.
I don't see the problem.
originally posted by: Daavin
Being Canadian and really not picking any side, it is my opinion that the answer to the last question really hurt Trump when he said "she won't quit, she's a fighter"
Talk about shooting yourself in the foot there Donald
originally posted by: Daavin
Being Canadian and really not picking any side, it is my opinion that the answer to the last question really hurt Trump when he said "she won't quit, she's a fighter"
Talk about shooting yourself in the foot there Donald