BLM planning to loot and raid after Hurricane hits

Now I know know a few bad apples doesnt constitute a whole movements blessing on this matter. The question i have is what are they doing to stop this type of logic.
The article comes from a very bias political blog but if its true what does it say about the members of BLM.
Heres the link conservativedailypost.com... utm_medium=OneSignal

a reply to: digital01anarchy

True or not Black Lives Matter is not a peaceful movement. Doesn't even care about what it claims to care about- black lives.

a reply to: digital01anarchy
Won't be surprised if they do.

Not one of the tweets mentioned in this poorly written blogpost mentions BLM. It's just random people mentioning looting.

originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: digital01anarchy

True or not Black Lives Matter is not a peaceful movement. Doesn't even care about what it claims to care about- black lives.

Actually they do care thats why they only want to loot the white towns.

This crap is worthy of Stormfront ... not ATS.

a reply to: digital01anarchy

Out of how many?

Just curious. Majority, large minority, or not very many, at all. Or if they do, do the looters automatically belong to BLM?

a reply to: Atsbhct

I should think that that wouldn't be hard to miss...but apparently I'm wrong.

a reply to: seagull

As evidenced by the unfortunate star count for this OP.

a reply to: digital01anarchy
Hah, that's probably because statistically whites live better(wealth wise)? If they cared about black lives they'd take care of the issues within the black community...social and economic issues. Black on black crime. But let's ignore that, poor blacks

a reply to: digital01anarchy

A news announcer says the Hurricane Matthew will kill children. I wonder if he meant not just the Hurricane but also looters.

a reply to: digital01anarchy

black lives want big screen tv's for free? noooo not them.....

a reply to: ksiezyc

Says you all.

You guys create the straw man arguments, like this thread, and then say things like that.

I don't much care for BLM either since it had gotten much more radical portions, but still more peacefulness then violence.

a reply to: Sremmos80

Interesting.

a reply to: Sremmos80

yes so peaceful! lol get ur head out ur ass!

originally posted by: Atsbhct
a reply to: seagull

As evidenced by the unfortunate star count for this OP.

You are aware i stated these facts when posting the article I even stated the nature of the blog yet people like you try to knock down the article simply because you are afraid to look. Even if it was 4 people blm should state it has no intention of doing something as pathetic and opertunistic as looting hurricane victims in the name of social justice.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
This crap is worthy of Stormfront ... not ATS.

Warning people of possible looters is a racial thing now?

Never let a good crisis go to waste !!!

a reply to: lighter78

So they all fit into one neat little package, eh?

Speaking of heads somewhere...

a reply to: digital01anarchy

Why should BLM have to respond to a blogpost where someone stated these random Twitter users who apparently want to loot during hurricane Matthew are members of the movement. There's no evidence put forward by the s#*++¥ blog that these people are involved with BLM.

It's just another click bait website, and now you're sharing it so people can get angry about nothing.