It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.sciencebuddies.org...
When direct experimentation is not possible, scientists modify the scientific method. In fact, there are probably as many versions of the scientific method as there are scientists!
originally posted by: MamaJ
a reply to: Greggers
To prevent (I hope) further confusion this below is what I was trying to convey about the "Scientific Method"
www.sciencebuddies.org...
When direct experimentation is not possible, scientists modify the scientific method. In fact, there are probably as many versions of the scientific method as there are scientists!
When I was reading about exotic matter and the different types of exotic matter I wondered if there is a way or will we come up with a way to test and or experiment with matter or particles we cannot see.
Do you know what the scientific method IS? Do you know what a scientific model IS? Do you know the difference?
However, consider the high level definition of the scientific method: systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses. Nothing about that changes. I mean, how could it? To change that would be to change the very definition of science.
There have always been, and will always be, certain things which are beyond science.
And all that effort points towards new understanding of yet still other unknowns!
originally posted by: MamaJ
a reply to: Greggers
Do you know what the scientific method IS? Do you know what a scientific model IS? Do you know the difference?
Scientific model is a representation whose purpose is to explain and predict observed phenomena.
As we discussed the Scientific can be altered but to what degree Im not sure as Im not a scientist. I linked to the article I was reading about the method as I understand it.
What I guess Im confused about and evidently not making myself clear is how can we test something we cannot observe.
Clearly different scientific methodology is appropriate to answer different resesearch questions such as that of consciousness?
Science has been changing with time, has it not? It seems to me the quantum world will change the definition of science eventually. How could it not?
Although I understand certain things are beyond the scope of science it's still a hard one to swallow. This thing called "proof" ... everyone wants from Science. If science can't prove it, doesn't exist.
originally posted by: MamaJ
a reply to: Greggers
How will we ever figure out something like consciousness?
No. The definition of science has not changed over time
Science can only take an empirical approach to learning about nature. If you're suggesting that consciousness is more than what can be empirically measured, science will never figure it out
originally posted by: MamaJ
a reply to: Greggers
No. The definition of science has not changed over time
II see... sorry I thought the definition would have been different back in the day. I was thinking more along the lines that science was once a natural philosophy until really the scientific revolution?
What we have in modern science is astronomical for sure.