It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Why should they care? Do you honestly think this silly website will actually hurt Hillary in the polls just because it comes up in a Google search underneath Hillary's real website? Because I don't. I see this as just a cheap attempt confuse people that will be rather easy to ignore after making the mistake only once (how many legit news sites look like that? none). Just another right wing media site. Liberals are already pretty good at ignoring them once they click on them.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Because they didn't want it. His own words was they were just willing to pay him 2k for it. My guess is no one was searching for that or anyone that did would see her main site first. Because if you Google it that is what you get.
So again he bought a website that they didn't want... that isn't trolling.
I don't think you are seeing the bigger picture here. He has the site and just started advertising it. It will pick up enough organic hits in days for it to rank on the first page of Google when someone searches Clinton Kaine or something similar. That is a pretty big win in my eyes. I guess we will have to see where it lands, but still a nice troll nonetheless.
Just because they didn't want it means nothing really....they likely didn't have the foresight that something bad could come from it.
It's only a "nice troll" if it actually TROLLS someone. Right now, it isn't doing anything as you just admitted. So you are giving props for him doing nothing. Sounds like YOU are being trolled to me.
Apparently it has caused enough HRC supporters to click on it that it has now ranked at the top of the page on the search for their names...I'd say that is pretty good. It isn't like trumps supporters are searching for Clinton and Kaine that often.
Tell you what...go start a web page and get it to do the same and then come back and tell me how easy it is....
And you don't think ANY of that web traffic has anything to do with the article that is literally advertising it? You know the one you posted in the OP and others like it?
Nope...the numbers go back to July...well prior to Trump owning it or having anything written about it.
originally posted by: OrganizedChaos
Gotta love the ASCII art when you view the page source !!
(A) is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person, or - See more at: codes.lp.findlaw.com...
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: jonsoup
it doesn't matter if people in high places break the law now. Immunity is being handed out like Halloween candy.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Because they didn't want it. His own words was they were just willing to pay him 2k for it. My guess is no one was searching for that or anyone that did would see her main site first. Because if you Google it that is what you get.
So again he bought a website that they didn't want... that isn't trolling.
I don't think you are seeing the bigger picture here. He has the site and just started advertising it. It will pick up enough organic hits in days for it to rank on the first page of Google when someone searches Clinton Kaine or something similar. That is a pretty big win in my eyes. I guess we will have to see where it lands, but still a nice troll nonetheless.
Just because they didn't want it means nothing really....they likely didn't have the foresight that something bad could come from it.
It's only a "nice troll" if it actually TROLLS someone. Right now, it isn't doing anything as you just admitted. So you are giving props for him doing nothing. Sounds like YOU are being trolled to me.
Apparently it has caused enough HRC supporters to click on it that it has now ranked at the top of the page on the search for their names...I'd say that is pretty good. It isn't like trumps supporters are searching for Clinton and Kaine that often.
Tell you what...go start a web page and get it to do the same and then come back and tell me how easy it is....
And you don't think ANY of that web traffic has anything to do with the article that is literally advertising it? You know the one you posted in the OP and others like it?
Nope...the numbers go back to July...well prior to Trump owning it or having anything written about it.
Google Searches
Hillary
Clinton
Hillary Clinton
Clinton Kaine
Hillary Kaine
Hillary Tim
Hillary Clinton Tim Kaine
Clinton Tim
Of all those google searches only one popped up your "troll" website. ALL of them popped up Hillary's official website as a top search result. I think Hillary will be fine, but hey if you want to pretend this is hurting her then have at it. I just see you celebrating pettiness that won't mean anything.
originally posted by: jonsoup
codes.lp.findlaw.com...
Seems Mr.Trump might have broken the law with this purchase.
(A) is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person, or - See more at: codes.lp.findlaw.com...
originally posted by: jonsoup
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: jonsoup
it doesn't matter if people in high places break the law now. Immunity is being handed out like Halloween candy.
Okay then. Trump isn't in a "high place" though, so I fail to see your point.
originally posted by: jonsoup
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Sure, whatever floats you boat. She MUST be guilty or you all would simply be easily led fools who get distracted by obvious witch hunts. We know that's not true, huh?
originally posted by: jonsoup
codes.lp.findlaw.com...
Seems Mr.Trump might have broken the law with this purchase.
(A) is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person, or - See more at: codes.lp.findlaw.com...