It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: cooperton
Not a descendent of a distant ape.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
I would be a descendant of my mother and father.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
Oa reply to: cooperton
Oh look! A strawman from a creationist.
Yeah, not surprised.
originally posted by: Barcs
Origin of SPECIES, not life itself. I think we all know the purpose of this thread.
originally posted by: Barcs
And completely OT, but Tzar, I love the new avatar.
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: TerryDon79
I would be a descendant of my mother and father.
Somewhere down your lineage, according to the theory of evolution, would eventually be an ape. If you go far enough through your lineage, your greatest grandparent would also theoretically be a unicellular organism.
This is part of evolutionary theory, is this something you are not aware of?
originally posted by: TzarChasm
All this thread proves is that the less refined members of the forum have succeeded in dragging others down to their level in terms of petty threads and cheap posts. Let's try to be more informative and less provocative with our evolution threads, hmm?
originally posted by: TerryDon79
Actually not worth "debating" with an intellectually challenged inferior.
originally posted by: Phantom423
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: TerryDon79
I would be a descendant of my mother and father.
Somewhere down your lineage, according to the theory of evolution, would eventually be an ape. If you go far enough through your lineage, your greatest grandparent would also theoretically be a unicellular organism.
This is part of evolutionary theory, is this something you are not aware of?
That is totally false. Common ancestry does not mean your great uncle was an ape. You still don't understand divergence and diversity.
If you were a scientist who traveled to another planet and you observed that there was a very wide diversity of life, you might think that they were all totally different. But after doing genetic analysis (assuming they have a genetic structure), you found that they all had a statistically significant number of genes in common. What would be your conclusion?
If you were a scientist you would make an assumption that all creatures on this planet have a commonality. They are all different but the the vast majority of their genetic profiles are similar. That says a lot about the planet, the organisms living on it, speciation and their genetic profiles.
Don't you get it yet?? COMMONALITY, COMMON ANCESTRY, DIVERGENCE, DIVERSITY, ADAPTATION, NATURAL SELECTION AND (here we have a drum role) EVOLUTION!!!
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: TheKnightofDoom
Wisdom teeth are another good one. They cause all sorts of fun for folk. Damn that shrinking jaw
originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: Noinden
I learnt about a tendon in only 1 in 3 of us today in your wrist if you put your thumb and little finger touching together and look at your wrist you may have a tendon there (you will see it) and that is a useless tendon which we used when our ancestors were on all fours.
Been doing it all day looking I have the odd monkey tendon