It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AshFan
Lately I've noticed my little girl being very jealous if she is not the center of attention. So much so that she lashes out just to get ANY attention, be it positive or negative. I hope she grows out of it.
originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: AshFan
I have heard rumours of these "Trainers" trainers of Demons! they will die also.
(Shooting starts soon for a 30 minute movie I'm making) .
originally posted by: Phantom423
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: coomba98
At least he provides opposing evidence and views.
Raggedyman doesn'tprovide anything.
The onus is not on me to provide anything, I am not saying I have evidence
The onus is on you
The onus is on science to provide empirical evidence
I still havnt seen any
All I hear is we have shown you, yet, I havnt seen any empirical evidence
So why not just show it to me, empirical evidence that is
Not assumption, real scientific evidence, not faith or belief, real science
I can go on and on and all you can do is ad hominem, let's keep playing
I just have to post asking for empirical evidence, that's all I will do
Talk is cheap, empirical evidence wins the flag, go get them my little students of science, get amongst it
Win the day, shut me up.
Get the empirical evidence
originally posted by: AshFan
I was on the phone with my mom last night, and I was describing a behavior that I found both sad and hilarious, and she got offended thinking that I was talking about her. Even though she had no empirical evidence. Is it her ego that causes this insecurity, or just a lack of normal reasoning skills?
Oh well, topic for a different thread.
originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: AshFan
We should start a thread "Empirical evidence" put it in the joke section and have fun with it.
originally posted by: JackKcaj
Empirical evidence, also known as sense experience, is the knowledge or source of knowledge acquired by means of the senses, particularly by observation and experimentation.[1] The term comes from the Greek word for experience, ἐμπειρία (empeiría). After Immanuel Kant, it is common in philosophy to call the knowledge thus gained a posteriori knowledge (in contrast to a priori knowledge).
Observe! I have the evidence because I have sense!
originally posted by: AshFan
originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: AshFan
We should start a thread "Empirical evidence" put it in the joke section and have fun with it.
I thought that is what we were doing.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Phantom423
So you are STILL NOT going to offer any empirical evidence
I know you won't because you can't, science doesn't have any
You don't know science, scienc doesn't have any, go search empirical evidence for evolution, it doesn't exist
You lie, it's all you can do, lie
Phantom, there is no empirical evidence, there is none, that's a fact
If there was you would show it to me here and now
You, science have nothing, just faith and belief
Pull the trigger
Now please learn simple
I am not saying creation is science, there is no onus on me to prove it
I accept its a faith
originally posted by: AshFan
a reply to: Raggedyman
Do you need empirical evidence to challenge empirical evidence?