It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: facedye
originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: facedye
There is nothing perplexing about it if you go directly to what Assange and Wikileaks has actually said. I certainly wish the phenomena around here of hanging on to fishing line that will just cast you out then in again were actually perplexing. The sad truth is too many people don't think any more.
sorry, but did you just imply that I and other people here "don't think anymore" because we were let down by Assange today?
was it Assange or someone else that explicitly stated he'll bring Hillary down before the debates on the 26th?
this is what he actually said, is it not?
“We will be starting some more publications that will be running, with publications happening every few days – they’ll be starting in a few days – and we have several of them with a number of interesting revelations that will be coming out to do with….the election,” said Harrison.
originally posted by: UKTruth
From Sarah Harrison of Wikileaks (today on al Jazeera)
“We will be starting some more publications that will be running, with publications happening every few days – they’ll be starting in a few days – and we have several of them with a number of interesting revelations that will be coming out to do with….the election,” said Harrison.
At least Alex Jones is calling Assange out for basically trolling the internet and talking about how there may be something more sinister at work.
originally posted by: Kapriti
a reply to: UKTruth
Now that is fascinating information on top of Guccifer 2.0's extraordinary drop of information found on the Clinton Foundation servers. I expect WikiLeaks shall have the last laugh on all of its detractors today.
originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: Kapriti
I think rather than Assange having the last laugh, he may end up praying that we Americans finally stand up and demand the changes that the world desperately needs from us.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: daaskapital
Thanks for the reply. Alex is an idiot regardless of whatever else went on.
Just wanted to say that
originally posted by: lovebeck
originally posted by: Kapriti
a reply to: UKTruth
Now that is fascinating information on top of Guccifer 2.0's extraordinary drop of information found on the Clinton Foundation servers. I expect WikiLeaks shall have the last laugh on all of its detractors today.
At least Guccifer 2.0 didn't let us down.
Assange was a total disappointment this morning, like he has been for months...
Reminds me of the Boy Who Cried Wolf.
The hacker known as Guccifer 2.0 claims to have hacked into the Clinton Foundation’s computer servers. A review of the newly released documents, however, reveals no information about the Clinton Foundation.
Instead, the documents appear to come mostly from the Democratic Party of Virginia. Other documents appear to come from the national Democratic party.
originally posted by: daaskapital
originally posted by: facedye
originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: facedye
There is nothing perplexing about it if you go directly to what Assange and Wikileaks has actually said. I certainly wish the phenomena around here of hanging on to fishing line that will just cast you out then in again were actually perplexing. The sad truth is too many people don't think any more.
sorry, but did you just imply that I and other people here "don't think anymore" because we were let down by Assange today?
was it Assange or someone else that explicitly stated he'll bring Hillary down before the debates on the 26th?
this is what he actually said, is it not?
FFS, read the thread. Myself and others debunked that pages ago.
I think we are talking too soon. Assange has stated that WikiLeaks will publish material over the next 10 weeks. That said, i agree that they could have exercised better public relations.
WikiLeaks, as a policy, doesn't publicly comment on material prior to their publication, so perhaps this was preventing them from confirming or denying specific material. Assange has always said it was 'serious' and 'interesting' though. Hardly evoking words.
originally posted by: facedye
originally posted by: daaskapital
originally posted by: facedye
originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: facedye
There is nothing perplexing about it if you go directly to what Assange and Wikileaks has actually said. I certainly wish the phenomena around here of hanging on to fishing line that will just cast you out then in again were actually perplexing. The sad truth is too many people don't think any more.
sorry, but did you just imply that I and other people here "don't think anymore" because we were let down by Assange today?
was it Assange or someone else that explicitly stated he'll bring Hillary down before the debates on the 26th?
this is what he actually said, is it not?
FFS, read the thread. Myself and others debunked that pages ago.
here's the thing, directly quoting you from another reply you made here:
I think we are talking too soon. Assange has stated that WikiLeaks will publish material over the next 10 weeks. That said, i agree that they could have exercised better public relations.
WikiLeaks, as a policy, doesn't publicly comment on material prior to their publication, so perhaps this was preventing them from confirming or denying specific material. Assange has always said it was 'serious' and 'interesting' though. Hardly evoking words.
my point, and the point of some others here, is that he's clearly milking this. wikileaks doesn't publicly comment on material prior to their publications?
Assange on Peston
looks like he's stating his (at the time) upcoming release contains enough within it for an indictment, among other facets of what's to come.
the man runs an organization revolving around data retrieval and transparency. surely if so many of these statements were misquotes, or weren't what he said at all, what he ought to do is make that clear.
maybe i missed it - did you come across anything that flat out proves he didn't make some of these statements for a fact?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: UKTruth
From Sarah Harrison of Wikileaks (today on al Jazeera)
“We will be starting some more publications that will be running, with publications happening every few days – they’ll be starting in a few days – and we have several of them with a number of interesting revelations that will be coming out to do with….the election,” said Harrison.
Well, I'm over it. I no longer care what Assange has to say.
Kind of a "Cry Wolf" feeling.
And be sure to buy his book.