It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Criminal charges against three men in Michigan on Wednesday marked a milestone in a crisis that's been years in the making, potentially harmed tens of thousands of people and cast a harsh spotlight on infrastructure issues across the country.
Mike Glasgow, Stephen Busch and Mike Prysby could face years of prison time if they're convicted. They're the first government employees to face charges tied to the Flint water crisis.
State Attorney General Bill Schuette told reporters that the charges "are only the beginning" of a lengthy and exhaustive probe. "No one is above the law, not on my watch," he said.
Gov. Rick Snyder maintained that he'd done nothing wrong. "Due process," he said, will reveal whether anyone acted criminally. Sound familiar?
originally posted by: introvert
The Michigan water issues are not comparable to Hillary's email.
It's quite possible that one of these men, for example, did not properly report lab results, or altered the results.
originally posted by: Realtruth
originally posted by: introvert
The Michigan water issues are not comparable to Hillary's email.
It's quite possible that one of these men, for example, did not properly report lab results, or altered the results.
Let's review your statement, and just change a couple of words.
Someone did not properly report illegal servers, breaches, but altered emails. But when it did become an issue they tried to destroy the evidence.
At least in Michigan no one was caught destroying evidence.
originally posted by: Realtruth
originally posted by: introvert
Still not the same thing. Sorry to say.
Well of course it's not the same thing, and you need not be sorry, or passive.
It has to do with the hypocrisy's in our blind justice system. One day you will understand young Jedi.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: Realtruth
Well, it's not like you can destroy the evidence in the Flint case. Unless you get rid of the kids that tested for lead poisoning that led to the investigation.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: Realtruth
I think it is pretty clear how the Flint children were poisoned, but if it makes you feel better you can deny it. I get that emails are much more fun. I have followed this case from the first, there are other resources, but do your own work.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Realtruth
Wow you took an issue that has literally ZERO to do with Clinton, used a false equivalence and managed to bring her into the discussion. I'd like to talk about the Flint water crisis, but this is just a loaded thread for right wingers to laugh at liberals for. Huge waste of space and nothing productive will be accomplished or discussed here.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Realtruth
Wow you took an issue that has literally ZERO to do with Clinton, used a false equivalence and managed to bring her into the discussion. I'd like to talk about the Flint water crisis, but this is just a loaded thread for right wingers to laugh at liberals for. Huge waste of space and nothing productive will be accomplished or discussed here.