How much Blackmail dirt and lawlessness information does China and Russia have on the Clintons?

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xeven

Please describe with verifiable details how Hillary is vulnerable to manipulation. One good solid example please.

Promising to "obliterate Iran" if they attack Israel. Israel has their own nuclear weapons. No reason we would have to "obliterate" anyone. This woman is going to get us all killed because she has to pay back the Rothschilds.

That's just what allies do, speck in support of the country their country is allied with.

dbl post

a reply to: defiythelie

This. This is why this info is only meant to be timed to hurt her in the polls. Roger Stone is just overhyping the info dump to get people biased against Hillary all hot and bothered.

Agree. Releasing it close to the election and giving reporters and D.C. just enough time to absorb it but not too much time to sit on it is the best case scenario for Assange for maximum effect. Especially today. People in the US are poor, dumb and have the attention spans of 4 year olds. Just the fact that we have these two candidates says it all.

originally posted by: defiythelie

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xeven

Please describe with verifiable details how Hillary is vulnerable to manipulation. One good solid example please.

Promising to "obliterate Iran" if they attack Israel. Israel has their own nuclear weapons. No reason we would have to "obliterate" anyone. This woman is going to get us all killed because she has to pay back the Rothschilds.

That's just what allies do, speck in support of the country their country is allied with.

I thought Israel already gets the US to invade and destroy Middle Eastern (read that Arab speaking) countries for them?

No?

Talking nukes is deflection.

a reply to: Xeven

How much Blackmail dirt and lawlessness information does China and Russia have on the Clintons?

obviously not much, russia have tried everything to get that retard trump elected, and bar a few idiots have failed.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: DAVID64

I'm not holding out hope for anything. I'm just playing the odds using deductive reasoning.

IF he has something, releasing it this close to election time, will give it time to spread and make it harder for MSM to dismiss. We all know people have short memories when it comes to this, so if he releases it too soon, it just gets lost in the "news of the day" cycle.

This is why I said he doesn't have anything that would break her. It's just stuff that could hurt her in the polls being released at key times to hurt her the most in the polling. If he had something that would break her, there would be no need for the dripping of info. Just release it all and let the justice department take over.

But the justus department won't take over and neither will the FBI. They're both in Clinton's bag of dirty tricks. That exceptionally evident from the email situation. As an example, manslaughter is killing without intent, murder is with intent, both carry jail terms. So the intent excuse flies in the face of reason, the people and the law. Comey (on the take) even said that under the same circumstances, other would be charged. What kind of BS is that?

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: bobs_uruncle

*eyeroll* Yeah that COULD be the case or maybe you have read too far into the situation than what is going on with reality. But hey believe what you want. Arguing this point with the believers is tedious to me anyways since you guys only want to listen to your biases and its hard to argue with the crazy narrative that EVERY ONE in the government is in Hillary's pocket (without any concrete evidence of these allegations either, just speculation).

a reply to: intrptr

Where was she manipulated there. Saying she might do something isn't somethingvshes done. So where's the solid example of her having been manipulated. Please. Something real.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Every presider has to swear to defend the Holy Land. Hillary and Trump were just over there talking to Nethanyahu, so was Bill Clinton, guess why?

a reply to: DAVID64

I think there is more then enough dirt on her,sounds very obvious,if nothing is of these E mails,why are they not made privy,if they indeed weren't classified,the pay for a title,thats very blatant,that alone was a breech of security,problem is,bunch of brainwashed shepple believe her and her socialist free ride ,just like the rest of liberals,what happened to getting a job and supporting yourself,I'm 63% disabled recent rating by state,I can still work can't do a lot but I don't falter,but I guess I'm too old school,I'm sad to see a bunch of fools want to destroy the country I have always held in self esteem

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Xeven

If Russia or China had anything on Hillary, they'd have already released them by now. It's no secret that Putin supports Trump and wants him to win and the Chinese seem to be on the Trump train too. So why would they resort to keeping information that could help the person they want to win secret? That's stupid. No the reality is that you are just doing wishful thinking in that Russia and China have dirt on the Clintons worth blackmailing over.

That is a naïve statement. Anything worth blackmailing Clinton over would be much more valuable if she is POTUS to Russia and China. You never show the ace up the sleeve.