It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
There are many people who decide to have more children for the income. I know a handful. And while society supporting children SOUNDS like a good thing, when the children being supported will become a continued drain on society when they grow up...your logic falls apart. When you breed takers, you tend to get more takers...and when the taker population grows to the point that the givers charity is used up...we have a problem.
originally posted by: amicktd
a reply to: imjack
No rehearsing necessary. All it took was actually listening to his speeches and not the 1-liners CNN feeds everyone else.
originally posted by: CigaretteByrnes
originally posted by: amicktd
a reply to: imjack
No rehearsing necessary. All it took was actually listening to his speeches and not the 1-liners CNN feeds everyone else.
And btw, that "listen to his speeches" BS has always been hilarious to me. That's something you say about someone who knows what they're doing. Not Trump.
originally posted by: CigaretteByrnes
originally posted by: amicktd
a reply to: imjack
No rehearsing necessary. All it took was actually listening to his speeches and not the 1-liners CNN feeds everyone else.
Oh, excuse me...But, Trumps speeches are actually worse when you waste your time taking all of it in. It's embarrassing. I feel bad for the guy. He's oblivous. Poor followers, they're oblivious, too.
And btw, that "listen to his speeches" BS has always been hilarious to me. That's something you say about someone who knows what they're doing. Not Trump.
Are we watching the same show?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
There are many people who decide to have more children for the income. I know a handful. And while society supporting children SOUNDS like a good thing, when the children being supported will become a continued drain on society when they grow up...your logic falls apart. When you breed takers, you tend to get more takers...and when the taker population grows to the point that the givers charity is used up...we have a problem.
But those people are smart, right? Don't do anything technically against the law and game the system. Make others pay to take up the slack. Smart!
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
There are many people who decide to have more children for the income. I know a handful. And while society supporting children SOUNDS like a good thing, when the children being supported will become a continued drain on society when they grow up...your logic falls apart. When you breed takers, you tend to get more takers...and when the taker population grows to the point that the givers charity is used up...we have a problem.
But those people are smart, right? Don't do anything technically against the law and game the system. Make others pay to take up the slack. Smart!
originally posted by: FaunaOrFlora
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
There are many people who decide to have more children for the income. I know a handful. And while society supporting children SOUNDS like a good thing, when the children being supported will become a continued drain on society when they grow up...your logic falls apart. When you breed takers, you tend to get more takers...and when the taker population grows to the point that the givers charity is used up...we have a problem.
But those people are smart, right? Don't do anything technically against the law and game the system. Make others pay to take up the slack. Smart!
According to Trumpettes.....it's "genius".
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
just a low-life, dirt-ball, creep.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
It should also be illegal to not pay any federal taxes when you are richer than everyone else who has to take up the slack.