It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
originally posted by: billydebunker
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: billydebunker
A flying saucer stopped all air traffic in the middle of the day at the nations busiest airport, O'Hare, in 2007. Not expectations, simply tangible reality. It is impossible to pretend otherwise.
Someone reporting they saw something that wasn't there would have the same effect. Try screaming "FIRE!" in a movie theater.
Let me get this straight with you too.
Are you saying that a flying saucer did NOT hover over O'Hare airport?
My point was that lots of things can cause air traffic to "stop". So of course, something unidentified in flight paths would cause air traffic to be diverted or whatever. It's not proof something was actually there.
Tsk, Tsk, mirageman, mirageman. Please don't play dumb, you know as well as I do that the entire stretch of road where this happened, and the earth beneath it, and the shoulders of the road, was completely dug up and replaced by the Army Corps of Engineers within a day of the incident. So really, man, you're a better debunker than that.
originally posted by: billydebunker
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
originally posted by: billydebunker
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: billydebunker
A flying saucer stopped all air traffic in the middle of the day at the nations busiest airport, O'Hare, in 2007. Not expectations, simply tangible reality. It is impossible to pretend otherwise.
Someone reporting they saw something that wasn't there would have the same effect. Try screaming "FIRE!" in a movie theater.
Let me get this straight with you too.
Are you saying that a flying saucer did NOT hover over O'Hare airport?
My point was that lots of things can cause air traffic to "stop". So of course, something unidentified in flight paths would cause air traffic to be diverted or whatever. It's not proof something was actually there.
Was that yes or no quesion too difficult for you?
originally posted by: Willtell
Vallee was the perfect kind of guy to find the truth: erudite, scientific methodology, open to anything, and connected.
Lets start over from scratch or
Just keep lookin
One thing is for sure, if a guy like Vallee couldn’t find the truth likely nobody will.
That is a universal accepted truth which may be asking too much.
we just don't have the right kind of perceptual or intellectual abilities to make reasonable (to us) sense out of it.
What is in the way of us getting the right answer?
I am glad you found your answer.
Not everybody has sleep paralysis
originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: billydebunker
Tsk, Tsk, mirageman, mirageman. Please don't play dumb, you know as well as I do that the entire stretch of road where this happened, and the earth beneath it, and the shoulders of the road, was completely dug up and replaced by the Army Corps of Engineers within a day of the incident. So really, man, you're a better debunker than that.
Where did you get the information that the Army could get a whole load of asphalt and a team of engineers out just before New Year's Eve and resurface the road? The road section was entirely repaved in 1982 when major expansion work was undertaken in the area.
Am I trying to debunk the case? Absolutely not. There is still something being covered up now and it's not the road surface. What was the craft? What caused symptoms of radiation poisoning to the witnesses? There are still unanswered questions in this case over 3 decades later.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
originally posted by: billydebunker
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
originally posted by: billydebunker
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: billydebunker
A flying saucer stopped all air traffic in the middle of the day at the nations busiest airport, O'Hare, in 2007. Not expectations, simply tangible reality. It is impossible to pretend otherwise.
Someone reporting they saw something that wasn't there would have the same effect. Try screaming "FIRE!" in a movie theater.
Let me get this straight with you too.
Are you saying that a flying saucer did NOT hover over O'Hare airport?
My point was that lots of things can cause air traffic to "stop". So of course, something unidentified in flight paths would cause air traffic to be diverted or whatever. It's not proof something was actually there.
Was that yes or no quesion too difficult for you?
Let me put it this way. Perhaps maybe but not necessarily. My answer is as vague as any ufo. You make what you want from it. But yes. what does it matter anyway? and no.
originally posted by: Willtell
One thing is for sure, if a guy like Vallee couldn’t find the truth likely nobody will.
That is a universal accepted truth which may be asking too much. In any case, we really won't get it from a guy like Steve Greer or any of these AlienUFO hunters who have all been baffled. Granted some are dogmatic that they have the truth but that's as good as a religious belief.
Vallee was the perfect kind of guy to find the truth: erudite, scientific methodology, open to anything, and connected.
Lets start over from scratch or
Just keep lookin
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: Willtell
Vallee was the perfect kind of guy to find the truth: erudite, scientific methodology, open to anything, and connected.
Lets start over from scratch or
Just keep lookin
I'm afraid we can keep lookin 'til the alien cows come home, but we just don't have the right kind of perceptual or intellectual abilities to make reasonable (to us) sense out of it.
I believe Vallee is disinformation, and he ignored the vast majority of alien contact reports to cook up his stew of BS.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
I believe Vallee is disinformation, and he ignored the vast majority of alien contact reports to cook up his stew of BS.
What cases (specifically) did he ignore?
If all I've been through is coincidence
Are you saying that is just me?