It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
That's a stupid distinction.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
The view isn't outlawed. The speech is. Somehow that keeps escaping you and others like you. She's welcome to move to America and say whatever she wants about the holocaust.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
You obviously lack historical understanding.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
freedom of speech applies here too.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: Willtell
democracy?
Freedom of thought?
She's free to think whatever she pleases. She hasn't been in trouble for what she thinks, but rather what she does about her thoughts.
The moment you make illegal disagreeing with majority culture or some historical concept, then you open the door to the government forbidding other things from being discussed. It's a very dangerous and slippery slope.
Well that slope is over 30 years old and nothing has happened.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
That's a stupid distinction.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
The view isn't outlawed. The speech is. Somehow that keeps escaping you and others like you. She's welcome to move to America and say whatever she wants about the holocaust.
What an incredibly well reasoned and well crafted rebuttal.
originally posted by: verschickter
a reply to: TheKnightofDoom
Sadly, yes. However, it was told to me that the greatest part of the americans were very friendly towards the population, I feel that has to be said again after my post.
Freedom of conscience and speech is considered a primary form of freedom. Even the UN agrees on that regarding human rights. And yes, I absolutely have the right to judge this law.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
You seem to have problems understanding that some laws are unjust.... And no, more places than just the US have freedom of speech..
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Freedom of speech includes freedom of opinion... Including statements.
originally posted by: Jennyfrenzy
a reply to: gladtobehere
She isn't questioning it though. She flat out said:
From OP source:
During her defence she said that the Holocaust of six million Jews 'was the greatest and longest lived lie in history.'
That's a statement, plain and simple. No questions there, she called it a lie.
Did you miss my post earlier that pointed out the the 1st only applies to the US?
The German high court doesn't seem to think it's unjust. And it's your opinion that it is, which means what?
Dick all, that's what.
I'm sorry, I have yet to see an intelligent rebuttal of our points. And your assertion that someone has freedom of 'view' but not of speech is prima facie ridiculous. There has never been a country on Earth where people couldn't have hidden beliefs. One aspect of totalitarian laws is that you can't VOICE them without legal consequences. Go learn some history.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
That's a stupid distinction.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
The view isn't outlawed. The speech is. Somehow that keeps escaping you and others like you. She's welcome to move to America and say whatever she wants about the holocaust.
What an incredibly well reasoned and well crafted rebuttal.
Apparently more than you. Slippery slopes...
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
You obviously lack historical understanding.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
freedom of speech applies here too.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: Willtell
democracy?
Freedom of thought?
She's free to think whatever she pleases. She hasn't been in trouble for what she thinks, but rather what she does about her thoughts.
The moment you make illegal disagreeing with majority culture or some historical concept, then you open the door to the government forbidding other things from being discussed. It's a very dangerous and slippery slope.
Well that slope is over 30 years old and nothing has happened.
Let me guess. You read a book.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Freedom of conscience and speech is considered a primary form of freedom. Even the UN agrees on that regarding human rights. And yes, I absolutely have the right to judge this law.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
You seem to have problems understanding that some laws are unjust.... And no, more places than just the US have freedom of speech..
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Freedom of speech includes freedom of opinion... Including statements.
originally posted by: Jennyfrenzy
a reply to: gladtobehere
She isn't questioning it though. She flat out said:
From OP source:
During her defence she said that the Holocaust of six million Jews 'was the greatest and longest lived lie in history.'
That's a statement, plain and simple. No questions there, she called it a lie.
Did you miss my post earlier that pointed out the the 1st only applies to the US?
The German high court doesn't seem to think it's unjust. And it's your opinion that it is, which means what?
Dick all, that's what.
Yes, illegalizing free speech is a practice of TOTALITARIAN governments. You know, like the Nazis? Or USSR? The people on here supporting it fail to see the extreme irony here, and historically validated danger from such practices.
originally posted by: wayforward
a reply to: gladtobehere
Either you believe in the freedom of speech or you don't. The ones who don't are either not Americans or need to move out of America because are not welcome here. They should at the very least move to California where they can be hypocrites and yet always feel right. That said, our rights are natural and not bound by borders. It is legal to speak what we will in any place on Earth because our rights render law invalid where the law is wrong.
The moment you attempt to limit the freedom of speech it is no longer a right. If a law attempts to violate a right, the law is null and void. In fact we are only bound to what we have agreed to follow. If the 87 year old never signed a written agreement saying she won't report Hitler's camps were labor camps, then she has no social contract preventing her from saying so.
I reject cultures that interfere with my natural rights. Germany is becoming Nazi again, clearly. If they hate Hitler so much then they should stop acting like the guy is their best buddy by implementing all his policies such as imprisoning people over speech. That would go much further in helping out their reputation.
I hope the half of the comments in support of the Nazi speech policies are not from Americans because if so these people need to move out... maybe move to Germany and start a labor camp... but they are very much anti-freedom and against us who have values of liberty.
Wow, an ad hominem attack, the refuge of those losing an argument.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
That's a stupid distinction.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
The view isn't outlawed. The speech is. Somehow that keeps escaping you and others like you. She's welcome to move to America and say whatever she wants about the holocaust.
What an incredibly well reasoned and well crafted rebuttal.
Rebuttal. Is that where one continues to make an ass of themselves?
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Wow, an ad hominem attack, the refuge of those losing an argument.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
That's a stupid distinction.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
The view isn't outlawed. The speech is. Somehow that keeps escaping you and others like you. She's welcome to move to America and say whatever she wants about the holocaust.
What an incredibly well reasoned and well crafted rebuttal.
Rebuttal. Is that where one continues to make an ass of themselves?
originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
What is there to deny btw it happened Hitler and his Nazi scumbags killed millions people like this woman should have consequences for her action of breaking the law.