It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
From: www.scientificamerican.com...
Title: The Workings of an Ancient Nuclear Reactor.
Two billion years ago parts of an African uranium deposit spontaneously underwent nuclear fission. The details of this remarkable phenomenon are just now becoming clear.
originally posted by: 123143
Chernobyl - 1 reactor
Fukushima - 3 reactors
Do the math. Fukushima is worse, but no one wants to admit it. Our governments think they're protecting us by telling us lies.
I'm reading FUKUSHIMA: THE STORY OF A NUCLEAR DISASTER right now. It was bad from Day 1. Uncovered cores and spent fuel pools, steam and hydrogen explosions. Cesium-127 leaking straight into the sea from fractured containment vessels.
That area is poisoned for the next 24,000 years. They should have encased it in a sarcophagus immediately.
The Japanese were very arrogant and in complete denial. The US and other countries offered immediate help and the Japanese didn't want it.
The title of the book SHOULD be FUKUSHIMA: HOW NOT TO HANDLE A NUCLEAR DISASTER.
The Russians handled Chernobyl much better, although they, too, lose points for keeping secrets at the onset of the disaster.
originally posted by: neutronflux
For their side of the globe, wouldn't it be South American syndrome?
originally posted by: stinkelbaum
originally posted by: 123143
Chernobyl - 1 reactor
Fukushima - 3 reactors
Do the math. Fukushima is worse, but no one wants to admit it. Our governments think they're protecting us by telling us lies.
I'm reading FUKUSHIMA: THE STORY OF A NUCLEAR DISASTER right now. It was bad from Day 1. Uncovered cores and spent fuel pools, steam and hydrogen explosions. Cesium-127 leaking straight into the sea from fractured containment vessels.
That area is poisoned for the next 24,000 years. They should have encased it in a sarcophagus immediately.
The Japanese were very arrogant and in complete denial. The US and other countries offered immediate help and the Japanese didn't want it.
The title of the book SHOULD be FUKUSHIMA: HOW NOT TO HANDLE A NUCLEAR DISASTER.
The Russians handled Chernobyl much better, although they, too, lose points for keeping secrets at the onset of the disaster.
wrong
so many years later and still so stupid, how?
for those that can't be bothered to follow the link
fukushima released 900 PBq of radiation affecting around 60km.
chernobyl released 5,200 PBq of radiation affecting around 500km.
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: AnkhMorpork
I know Fukushima may be in bad shape, but the video is from 2011.
It's hard to believe someone starting a thread about Fukushima knows so little about Fukushima especially when lots of information is widely available about it on the internet, like this:
originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
Thanks for pointing this out.
What HAVE they done since then and is it now fully contained and getting cleaned up?