Specialist Says Tonights Debate Might Cause Hillary To Have An Epileptic Seizure

a reply to: shawmanfromny

Not to be "the one", but that video only shows half the story. What's going on the other side of the camera? What are they all looking at? That "expert" is giving an opinion on only what he can see - which isn't enough in my opinion in this instance.

Besides, they all seem to be secret service given how fast they acted, not to mention the typical jumpiness.

Just sayin'.

originally posted by: youcanttellthepeople
a reply to: shawmanfromny

Not to be "the one", but that video only shows half the story. What's going on the other side of the camera? What are they all looking at? That "expert" is giving an opinion on only what he can see - which isn't enough in my opinion in this instance.

Besides, they all seem to be secret service given how fast they acted, not to mention the typical jumpiness.

Just sayin'.

Well they certainly weren't trying to get her out of the way of anything or guard her from anyone. It is obvious she had to be cue'd on something, whether a forgotten line or a seizure of some sort. She did appear dazed and at a loss for words for a few seconds which is odd.

originally posted by: imitator
I wonder what kind of broadcast delay we will be seeing, I bet if she has a seizure they will edit it out with the delay and go to commercial break. Then come back like nothing ever happened.

No commercials. So if there is one we will know something is up. I bet you're right though. There will be a longer delay than normal . It's usually two minutes I think.

I hope it doesn't get cancelled.

You know what I'm waiting for? IF, she can't keep up, or IF they notice she may be having some sort of medical issue, & Trump shows her sympathy, which I'm positive he will, how the MSM, or KILLERY lovers, will spin Trumps concern! Now THAT would be interesting........

originally posted by: youcanttellthepeople
a reply to: shawmanfromny

Not to be "the one", but that video only shows half the story. What's going on the other side of the camera? What are they all looking at? That "expert" is giving an opinion on only what he can see - which isn't enough in my opinion in this instance.

Besides, they all seem to be secret service given how fast they acted, not to mention the typical jumpiness.

Just sayin'.

There was a group of people waving a white and black flag around - whatever she has was triggered by that.

This video illustrates why HRC has small, controlled events. As someone else pointed out, for her Doctor & SS to react so fast at this, and the 9/11 collapse - clearly they know.

I did catch that the crowd tonight is not allowed to clap - could this health issue be related to that rule?

If she needs a "handler" to step in and tell her to "keep talking" when dealing with a protester how is she going to run the free world? The woman is literally a marionette.

Meanwhile some jack-knob throws golf balls painted with swastikas at Trump and he shrugged it off. I know who I want my president to be based off of class of character alone. Take policies and morals into consideration and it's Trump by a factor of about a million.

This video shows the flag that triggered her @ 14 seconds. At 8 seconds her head swivels to the flag like a homing missile.



Similar to her reaction @ 4 seconds here.

originally posted by: violet

No commercials. So if there is one we will know something is up. I bet you're right though. There will be a longer delay than normal . It's usually two minutes I think.

I hope it doesn't get cancelled.

Two minute delay is long enough to snip out a seizure without a commercial, none would notice unless we catch a time glitch.

She's been resting and I'm sure will receive medications to alleviate any unusual display of symptoms for at least that hour and a half.

I don't get the feeling there will be any medical drama tonight. Other drama....you bet!!

a reply to: shawmanfromny
This video ran here weeks and weeks ago saying basically the same thing. That the fellow rushed in was her handler, her medical assistant. Bosh

There is a disruption in the audience. She stops talking for a moment and focuses on the disturbance which is slightly to her right and down in the audience.That disturbance, a small protest, is enough for him, a body guard, and the other security to come in closer to her. This is all in a matter of seconds.

Does he look at her? Yes, for a split second, he looks at the side of her head. The rest of the time he focuses off stage at the disturbance. Would not a doctor at least once look at her face, look at her eyes? He does not.

Some were saying in that last thread that he was there holding her up. Nope, He was up and in close for protection if needed. Watch the video again.

The other two focus on the disturbance while the big fellow on her left moves in close for body protection. He also is focused on the audience to her right. All the people on the stage are focusing on the same thing. Are they all having seizures?

One of the quotes you offer say he is holding a Valium pen. I watched that video a number of times when it first was posted and now, in respect for you, have watched it several times again. I SEE NOTHING IN HIS HAND. Will you look at it again please and let us know exactly when that supposed pen is seen in his hand?

Then this big fellow takes charge of the other security team and instructs them on what to do next. Do you imagine that a security team would be taking orders with no questions at all from a doctor? No. He was the security cheif ordering HIS security team during the disruption.

Oh wait, oh wait. My apologies. Now that I have watched the video for the 12th time, I do notice a man appear from off stage after she is back on track from focusing on the disturbance. At one point it appears that he might be pulling something out of an inner jacket pocket. Sure it might be a valium pen, but it might also be a pen. What it appears to me to be is a small microphone because it also appears to have a chord hanging from it when he puts it away. . Look again.
I think he is security also.

originally posted by: queenofswords
She's been resting and I'm sure will receive medications to alleviate any unusual display of symptoms for at least that hour and a half.

I don't get the feeling there will be any medical drama tonight. Other drama....you bet!!

I would tend to agree with you, that said the doctors do seem to be having a hard time getting the medications right.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: shawmanfromny
This video ran here weeks and weeks ago saying basically the same thing. That the fellow rushed in was her handler, her medical assistant. Bosh

There is a disruption in the audience. She stops talking for a moment and focuses on the disturbance which is slightly to her right and down in the audience.That disturbance, a small protest, is enough for him, a body guard, and the other security to come in closer to her. This is all in a matter of seconds.

Does he look at her? Yes, for a split second, he looks at the side of her head. The rest of the time he focuses off stage at the disturbance. Would not a doctor at least once look at her face, look at her eyes? He does not.

Some were saying in that last thread that he was there holding her up. Nope, He was up and in close for protection if needed. Watch the video again.

The other two focus on the disturbance while the big fellow on her left moves in close for body protection. He also is focused on the audience to her right. All the people on the stage are focusing on the same thing. Are they all having seizures?

One of the quotes you offer say he is holding a Valium pen. I watched that video a number of times when it first was posted and now, in respect for you, have watched it several times again. I SEE NOTHING IN HIS HAND. Will you look at it again please and let us know exactly when that supposed pen is seen in his hand?

Then this big fellow takes charge of the other security team and instructs them on what to do next. Do you imagine that a security team would be taking orders with no questions at all from a doctor? No. He was the security cheif ordering HIS security team during the disruption.

Oh wait, oh wait. My apologies. Now that I have watched the video for the 12th time, I do notice a man appear from off stage after she is back on track from focusing on the disturbance. At one point it appears that he might be pulling something out of an inner jacket pocket. Sure it might be a valium pen, but it might also be a pen. What it appears to me to be is a small microphone because it also appears to have a chord hanging from it when he puts it away. . Look again.
I think he is security also.

Did protestors cause this?

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Or maybe as soon as she started to go weird her handlers gave the signal to the "protesters" to start and take attention away from her...

originally posted by: kamatty
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Or maybe as soon as she started to go weird her handlers gave the signal to the "protesters" to start and take attention away from her...

I hadn't thought about that. That is entirely possible. When you think about it, it is kind of strange that they would have allowed protesters such as those so close to the stage, doesn't it! Just enough time to get her snapped out of it while it looks like everybody is focused on the prop of protesters. hmmmm

originally posted by: imitator
I wonder what kind of broadcast delay we will be seeing, I bet if she has a seizure they will edit it out with the delay and go to commercial break. Then come back like nothing ever happened.

There are no commercial breaks in tonight's debate.

originally posted by: Steak

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: shawmanfromny
This video ran here weeks and weeks ago saying basically the same thing. That the fellow rushed in was her handler, her medical assistant. Bosh

There is a disruption in the audience. She stops talking for a moment and focuses on the disturbance which is slightly to her right and down in the audience.That disturbance, a small protest, is enough for him, a body guard, and the other security to come in closer to her. This is all in a matter of seconds.

Does he look at her? Yes, for a split second, he looks at the side of her head. The rest of the time he focuses off stage at the disturbance. Would not a doctor at least once look at her face, look at her eyes? He does not.

Some were saying in that last thread that he was there holding her up. Nope, He was up and in close for protection if needed. Watch the video again.

The other two focus on the disturbance while the big fellow on her left moves in close for body protection. He also is focused on the audience to her right. All the people on the stage are focusing on the same thing. Are they all having seizures?

One of the quotes you offer say he is holding a Valium pen. I watched that video a number of times when it first was posted and now, in respect for you, have watched it several times again. I SEE NOTHING IN HIS HAND. Will you look at it again please and let us know exactly when that supposed pen is seen in his hand?

Then this big fellow takes charge of the other security team and instructs them on what to do next. Do you imagine that a security team would be taking orders with no questions at all from a doctor? No. He was the security cheif ordering HIS security team during the disruption.

Oh wait, oh wait. My apologies. Now that I have watched the video for the 12th time, I do notice a man appear from off stage after she is back on track from focusing on the disturbance. At one point it appears that he might be pulling something out of an inner jacket pocket. Sure it might be a valium pen, but it might also be a pen. What it appears to me to be is a small microphone because it also appears to have a chord hanging from it when he puts it away. . Look again.
I think he is security also.

Did protestors cause this?

NO. But that was not the 'evidence' presented in the OP. The video you offer is also another old video. The video you offer is also open for debate. What I see in your video might be indications of a sever medical condition. I say 'might'. It also 'might be an older lady with pneumonia who has just over extended her endurance and needs a rest.

I am not sure of her medical conditions, but I gotta tell you, neither of those two videos presents to me an indication of anything more than a momentary reaction to a threat(the protest) and evidence that she was fatigued from pneumonia and needed a rest.

originally posted by: kamatty
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Or maybe as soon as she started to go weird her handlers gave the signal to the "protesters" to start and take attention away from her...

Or maybe, or maybe. Come on here kamatty. Watch that video again. She is gabbing along looking in one direction when suddenly she turns an looks in the other direction. To that point there is no indication from her at all that anything is amiss.
From that moment,it is only a matter of a second or two before she is surrounded by her body guard. How in that period of time was your idea orchestrated. One would have to believe in an incredibly well oiled machine to have pulled that off. Her machine shows little indication elsewhere of being so extraordinarily competent.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire

originally posted by: Steak

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: shawmanfromny
This video ran here weeks and weeks ago saying basically the same thing. That the fellow rushed in was her handler, her medical assistant. Bosh

There is a disruption in the audience. She stops talking for a moment and focuses on the disturbance which is slightly to her right and down in the audience.That disturbance, a small protest, is enough for him, a body guard, and the other security to come in closer to her. This is all in a matter of seconds.

Does he look at her? Yes, for a split second, he looks at the side of her head. The rest of the time he focuses off stage at the disturbance. Would not a doctor at least once look at her face, look at her eyes? He does not.

Some were saying in that last thread that he was there holding her up. Nope, He was up and in close for protection if needed. Watch the video again.

The other two focus on the disturbance while the big fellow on her left moves in close for body protection. He also is focused on the audience to her right. All the people on the stage are focusing on the same thing. Are they all having seizures?

One of the quotes you offer say he is holding a Valium pen. I watched that video a number of times when it first was posted and now, in respect for you, have watched it several times again. I SEE NOTHING IN HIS HAND. Will you look at it again please and let us know exactly when that supposed pen is seen in his hand?

Then this big fellow takes charge of the other security team and instructs them on what to do next. Do you imagine that a security team would be taking orders with no questions at all from a doctor? No. He was the security cheif ordering HIS security team during the disruption.

Oh wait, oh wait. My apologies. Now that I have watched the video for the 12th time, I do notice a man appear from off stage after she is back on track from focusing on the disturbance. At one point it appears that he might be pulling something out of an inner jacket pocket. Sure it might be a valium pen, but it might also be a pen. What it appears to me to be is a small microphone because it also appears to have a chord hanging from it when he puts it away. . Look again.
I think he is security also.

Did protestors cause this?

NO. But that was not the 'evidence' presented in the OP. The video you offer is also another old video. The video you offer is also open for debate. What I see in your video might be indications of a sever medical condition. I say 'might'. It also 'might be an older lady with pneumonia who has just over extended her endurance and needs a rest.

I am not sure of her medical conditions, but I gotta tell you, neither of those two videos presents to me an indication of anything more than a momentary reaction to a threat(the protest) and evidence that she was fatigued from pneumonia and needed a rest.

One things for sure - we will not be getting the truth out of the Clinton Campaign.

Antibiotics can take care of pneumonia. What's the cure for an unhealthy penchant for privacy that repeatedly creates unnecessary problems?

— David Axelrod (@davidaxelrod) September 12, 2016

a reply to: shawmanfromny

Might be why they want the moderator to "fact check" Trump, then there is a ready excuse for why the moderator is debating Trump and not Hillary if something happens.

Such a request on the part of one candidate, and only one candidate,is a sign on weakness for that candidate.