Hillary Clinton Sponsored Secretive Arab Spring Program that Destabilized Middle East

originally posted by: gpols
a reply to: midicon

But Obama's right hand woman Valerie Jarrett, who is Iranian, is pro Ali Khamenei.

.

Valerie Jarrett is not Iranian. She was born in Iran to American parents. She lived there until she was 5. She is not Muslim nor 'pro Ali Khameni'.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: gpols
a reply to: midicon

But Obama's right hand woman Valerie Jarrett, who is Iranian, is pro Ali Khamenei.

.

Valerie Jarrett is not Iranian. She was born in Iran to American parents. She lived there until she was 5. She is not Muslim nor 'pro Ali Khameni'.

That is what Valerie says.
Hillary says that she never sent or received classified information.
I don't believe much of anything that those insiders say.

a reply to: reldra

I'd bet you 1.7 Billion dollars that this administration is very pro Ali Khameni.

The Obama administration also declined to support the green revolution in 2009.

I don't also don't know why you are throwing that whole Muslim thing in there, I didn't mention anything about that. I'm just making the statement, based on factual events that this administration is pro Ali Khameni and pro current regime in Iran.

It also leads back to the Arab Spring leading to this mess because Obama Admin did not support the Green Revolution.

originally posted by: AboveBoard


The Chinese are absolute Masters of intrigue, for example. I say this as a compliment -- they are incredibly intelligent and their form of government allows no real penetration of "state secrets" by a "Fifth Estate." We are competing against them while sometimes allying with them (or at least acting in parallel) and the lines between corporate advantage and governmental "players" get tangled and blurred.

The Russians are in the same category as the Chinese, and their government holds its secrets to its chest, and no one dares to question that -- it makes them powerful.

You are complimenting the Russians strength?

So, you find yourself agreeing with Trump on this issues then?

Because that is exactly what Trump has been saying.

Directly funding Islamic terrorist started no later than POTUS Jimmy Carter [Operation Cyclone].
There is no real ideological difference in the "good" [allegedly opposed to Assad] Islamic terrorist and the "bad" Islamic terrorist like ISIS.
They share the same doctrinal manual, the Koran, and honor the same personal example of Mohammed [leader of killers, enslavers, rapist and thieves] himself.
US government before and during the Obama regime contributed to the creation Islamic terrorist groups that evolved into ISIS and more groups.

Supporting Islamist ["wage war on infidels"] was betrayal of the American ["freedom of speech"] Constitution all along.
US support of Islamist is long time policy.
Modern US support of Islamist dates to FDR 1945 alliance with Wahhabi sect dominated Saudi Arabia.
Carter enabled Islamist takeover of Iran.
Carter regime funded Islamic terrorist - Operation Cyclone
RR supported Islamist terrorist
[and right wing RC “Contra” terrorist]
RR supplied arms to Iranian Islamist Khomeini
Clinton supported Islamist [and neo-Ustasha] in Balkans.
BUSH invasions were IN SERVICE to Islamist
[and military supplies manufacturers]
Obama has for years been OPENLY supporting “good” Islamic terrorist
[cover story being they oppose Assad who gave Christians the right to live]

There is no significant ideological difference in the “good” Islamic terrorist and the “bad” Islamic terrorist like ISIS.
Obama wars against Libya and Syria were worse than "lawless" ....
these wars are pure wicked [as were Bush invasions].