Useless SJW gives the finger to the wrong dude.

a reply to: reldra

Then you may get arrested. This guy was lucky.

Let's be clear here. You are advocating for a free society where anybody can insult anybody they choose, but god forbid that person take offence and try to reconcile any differences. Is that right?

Be the offender, not the offended?

OMG!!!

originally posted by: EvillerBob

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Bobaganoosh

No matter what the officer says, you can give someone the finger and they should not get into their car and follow you. This should be common sense.

I understand the officer saying that she should not stop there or repeatedly do this. But STILL, getting in your car and following someone, tailing, beeping the horn, none of those are legal things.

There's a few jump cuts in the video that might have removed some of the explanation for that, but she left in some interesting comments from the cop. He seems to be indicating that there is CCTV of previous incidents at that house involving the same woman. I've also heard elsewhere that she admitted in an online post this wasn't the first time she targeted that house.

This might have been an overreaction to a one time event. It might have been the householder getting to the end of his tether after a campaign of harassment. The householder isn't saying anything so we only have her side of things - and she doesn't strike me as the most credible or rational person.

I saw this posted elsewhere that seems to suggest she visits less... socially acceptable sites. I'm a little hesitant to post it because I'm not sure if it's real or just someone stirring up trouble. Also, it's got some unpleasant language. Click at your own peril.

Tara Dublin post? Bad language warning

No, the officer says the man has outdoor cameras. Not that he has fillmed her doing this often. I will look, but In know some people here visit certain 'unmentionable sites' as well and get their posts from them. Her personal life is reall not relevant.

That leads to a screenshot that barely looks like her. It doesn;t lead to an entire site.


It weould also be sort of opposite of what people think her to be 'about'.

IMO, they were both stupid. However if he did have cameras in front of his property, he knows it was her. She's been passing there everyday (her words), and she said she took a picture of the front of his house earlier in the week and posted it on social media (again her words). I don't find it hard to imagine that she has done other things in front of his house, if a Hillary for prison sign got her that upset in the first place. It is possible that the guy was already being harassed based on her picture and comments on social media.

He was stupid to follow her, but she should not have posted the picture of the front of his house on social media. The cop told him he should not have followed her. If he had went in front of her house and took a picture, and posted it on social media she would be have been (rightfully so) very upset! I just think she was an idiot for pretending she was a victim in all of this, and then posting her idiotic video for the world to see.

Both idiots here, but she comes off looking like the bigger idiot because she made a video and posted it online.

originally posted by: imjack
a reply to: imsoconfused

I went to schools. One of them only had one way to get there.

Btw, she was trying to pick them up.

SO? You can almost always avoid one street to get where you are going. Just turn down the next one. And he clearly did not live right by the school just from the video.

So again easy as hell to avoid his house end you know it.

She is a little high strung, lol

originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: reldra

She may have taken a pictures of the signs once, for social media.

No, she did do it watch the vid again.

We all know how crazy the sjw crowd is and by giving out this guys info is a very dumb thing for her to do, what if one of her crazy followers decides to go to his house and start trouble?

Your logic is seriously messed up.

You compare feminist SJW organization to a BLM level.

Her crazy followers? Is she the #ing leader of Al Qaeda?

The conclusion is obvious, they all left and she's not allowed to go back. She doesn't know the guy and doesn't want to.

The lady is not credible anyway.

She assured the cop that she didn't stop in front of the man's driveway.

Later she says to the cop... 'I stopped at his driveway'.

It can't be both.

originally posted by: WhoDat09
IMO, they were both stupid. However if he did have cameras in front of his property, he knows it was her. She's been passing there everyday (her words), and she said she took a picture of the front of his house earlier in the week and posted it on social media (again her words). I don't find it hard to imagine that she has done other things in front of his house, if a Hillary for prison sign got her that upset in the first place. It is possible that the guy was already being harassed based on her picture and comments on social media.

He was stupid to follow her, but she should not have posted the picture of the front of his house on social media. The cop told him he should not have followed her. If he had went in front of her house and took a picture, and posted it on social media she would be have been (rightfully so) very upset! I just think she was an idiot for pretending she was a victim in all of this, and then posting her idiotic video for the world to see.

Both idiots here, but she comes off looking like the bigger idiot because she made a video and posted it online.

I have the idea both are idiots. Only one did soething illegal, though.

originally posted by: butcherguy
The lady is not credible anyway.

She assured the cop that she didn't stop in front of the man's driveway.

Later she says to the cop... 'I stopped at his driveway'.

It can't be both.

She keeps saying she slowed down. She may have stopped in front of the house to take a picture, but that is not illegal either.

Several years ago, I had next door neighbors who did not like the frequency I mowed the lawn or trimmed the bushes. The type of bushes I have are not suppoed to be overly trimmed. He would take pictures form his own property. He would complain to the village, who would tell him there is nothing wrong in the pictures.

I never did anything about the picture taking.

Until he stood in the middle of my front lawn to take pictures. Then I called the police non emergency number.

I did say, out of the door 'get off of my lawn'. he didn't respond.

I then went in the house and called the police non emergency number.

They showed up and told him to stay off of my lawn. All done.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: WhoDat09
IMO, they were both stupid. However if he did have cameras in front of his property, he knows it was her. She's been passing there everyday (her words), and she said she took a picture of the front of his house earlier in the week and posted it on social media (again her words). I don't find it hard to imagine that she has done other things in front of his house, if a Hillary for prison sign got her that upset in the first place. It is possible that the guy was already being harassed based on her picture and comments on social media.

He was stupid to follow her, but she should not have posted the picture of the front of his house on social media. The cop told him he should not have followed her. If he had went in front of her house and took a picture, and posted it on social media she would be have been (rightfully so) very upset! I just think she was an idiot for pretending she was a victim in all of this, and then posting her idiotic video for the world to see.

Both idiots here, but she comes off looking like the bigger idiot because she made a video and posted it online.

I have the idea both are idiots. Only one did soething illegal, though.

Which one?

a reply to: imjack

She doesn't know the guy and doesn't want to.

Then why stop and harass him?

originally posted by: imsoconfused

originally posted by: imjack
a reply to: imsoconfused

I went to schools. One of them only had one way to get there.

Btw, she was trying to pick them up.

SO? You can almost always avoid one street to get where you are going. Just turn down the next one. And he clearly did not live right by the school just from the video.

So again easy as hell to avoid his house end you know it.

Lets just agree your statement was equally stupid to mine, I'm not proving anything to you other than what you said was an OBVIOUS generalization that YOU have NO IDEA of, and your evidence is that you have KIDS. I've had this conversation before, I'm not interested.

Yes, she's obviously not going back. She would have known it was a school zone if it was her school zone.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: butcherguy
The lady is not credible anyway.

She assured the cop that she didn't stop in front of the man's driveway.

Later she says to the cop... 'I stopped at his driveway'.

It can't be both.

She keeps saying she slowed down. She may have stopped in front of the house to take a picture, but that is not illegal either.

I watched the video and I also listened.

The cop asked her why she stopped. She said that she didn't stop... only slowed down and gave him the finger.

Later she says that she stopped in front of the driveway. It is in the video.

She is not credible.

a reply to: Jonjonj

Either we support everyone who gets offended by something or we don't support anyone who gets offended by something.

Which is it?

a reply to: reldra

You keep saying "she may have" but the facts are she did do them and she admits it in the vid, did you even watch?

She does a stupid thing. She can't foresee some stupid guy going road rage after her? Chasing her in his vehicle is really a poor move since that could end up causing all types of damage or injury to third parties if the rage gets going and things go wrong.

I willing to bet the guy has flipped off many a person.

Too many people are getting too out there.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: TheBulk

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Bobaganoosh

Which one is the snowflake, I can't tell anymore?

Is it the woman who flipped a guy off for having a bunch of Trump/Pence signs that were triggering her or is it they guy who was so triggered by her middle finger that he had to hop in a car and go after her?

Well the guy is probably tired of this psycho woman slowing driving by his house and acting crazy.

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Bobaganoosh

No matter what the officer says, you can give someone the finger and they should not get into their car and follow you. This should be common sense.

I understand the officer saying that she should not stop there or repeatedly do this. But STILL, getting in your car and following someone, tailing, beeping the horn, none of those are legal things.

I'm sorry, but no. She gave him every reason to document her license plate, car make and model.

She gave him the finger from her car one time. That does not mean 'he is tired of harassment'. That makes no sense.

That would mean that any time someone gives you the finger that you have the right to get in a car, follow them and tailgate and honk at them. It certainly does not.

The officer just wants to 'keep the peace'. The officer told the guy to not do that again and told her to not do that again.

She did not give him the finger "one time" from her car. She's been harassing the man for awhile. She clearly states it at the beginning of the video.

What is the beginning of the video again ? Her stating that she drives by his house every day... So this is most likely not the first time she has lashed out. Second she states she screamed obscenities at him, slandered him as a racist and then shot him the bird. Considering the fact she "drives by his house everyday" the likelihood she's done this more than once is clearly established. Notice i said likelihood...

But then she says something else, that totally destroys the idea this is a one time occurance. She clearly and openly admits to photographing his house (from the front which would include his street address) and posting it online for others !


This handful of admissions from her, paints an entirely different story. One of a person minding his own business, and being repeatedly harassed.

She openly states she's harassing him. I don't think she realized exactly what she was admitting to on camera, but that is what it was.

originally posted by: imsoconfused

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: WhoDat09
IMO, they were both stupid. However if he did have cameras in front of his property, he knows it was her. She's been passing there everyday (her words), and she said she took a picture of the front of his house earlier in the week and posted it on social media (again her words). I don't find it hard to imagine that she has done other things in front of his house, if a Hillary for prison sign got her that upset in the first place. It is possible that the guy was already being harassed based on her picture and comments on social media.

He was stupid to follow her, but she should not have posted the picture of the front of his house on social media. The cop told him he should not have followed her. If he had went in front of her house and took a picture, and posted it on social media she would be have been (rightfully so) very upset! I just think she was an idiot for pretending she was a victim in all of this, and then posting her idiotic video for the world to see.

Both idiots here, but she comes off looking like the bigger idiot because she made a video and posted it online.

I have the idea both are idiots. Only one did soething illegal, though.

Which one?

The one who got into his car and chased.

If he was tailgating and all that rubbish she was spewing---why not record it? Why just make baseless accusations to the cop without any evidence that he did those things? Obviously she had her phone so why not make the video to prove that he was acting in a threatening manner? Why chop up the video so badly? Was the cop asking her questions about previous behavior on her part?
I tend to think that child protection might want to look into her. If this is the type of behavior she is modeling for a child, she might need to get some psychological counseling for her "issues" with people of a different political persuasion. That's some serious schizoid behavior being displayed for the entire world to see. I feel sorry for the kid and all her family. I know what it feels like to have a seriously crazed family member posting their craziness to the world. It's just sad and depressing.