God! How could you possibly be a homophobic?

a reply to: Raggedyman

Christianity does not and should not denounce anyone other than christians who are sinners

Are there Christians who aren't sinners?

a reply to: LittleByLittle

From my point of view Paul and Muhammad was homophobic. And their views/opinion changes how some people see "god".

Exactly, Moses too probably, if he even existed. I find it fascinating that the men who pretended to know "God", and wrote behavior laws pretending that their phobias were God's phobia, are taken seriously by otherwise fairly intelligent people in this day and age!

a reply to: thyextendedself

He is not homophobic. He only stated that his called out people were not to practice it or allow anyone among them to practice it. If they did they were to be executed and that was only to keep the land pure. But Israel never followed the word of God anyway.

God is said to give people over to Homosexuality so it hardly makes him homophobic.

Have you not read

Romans 1:19 ¶ Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

Looks to me in this day and age God allows them to practice homosexuality as proof of his judgement on them for not believing he is.

a reply to: ketsuko

It seems as if you are trying to equate Normalizing Murder and Understanding That Homosexuality ( as ALL Sexual Orientation and Gender-Identities) are in fact Normal, Natural and OK

a reply to: YenSid

There is only one way to identify gender and that is by physical attributes.

Any other type of identifier such as "Feelings" or "Emotions" are mental and do not qualify as identifiers for gender.

There is nothing natural about Homosexuality in any of its forms.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

Well, first Gender-Identity and Sex are different and separate to sexual-Orientation.

And Sex (Being Genitalia) also doesn't "Identify" Gender, Look at Intersex people or Men born with Female reproductive systems etc.

As far as being Natural, what is not Natural? if you are talking strictly Intercourse, Heterosexual people engage in that practice as well, and some homosexual people don't, so that argument is inherently flawed

a reply to: YenSid

sexual orientation is based entirely on environment of human subjects only. It does not happen in nature among other animals.

There are women born with male parts they are called hermaphrodites and vise versa Male with female parts. Hermaphrodites exhibit extreme gender ID, if one is male with female they are basically that is the subject has no breasts the subject is a male, it there are breasts the subject is female.

Usually with a hermaphrodite one of the genders is dominate. One of the sex organ functions normally while the other does not. It is as if there was a fraternal twin was assimilated into one body but only one sex is dominate. so men with a vagina usually does not function normally, and vise versa a female with male sex organs usually there is not healthy normal ejaculations of that organ. Meaning the sperm if any is non-fertile

heterosexual relationships of animals of any class is natural. A male dogs humping another male dog never ends in ejaculation into the other male dog. the other male dog usually will nip or bite at the other stopping any penetration. Science has already observed that no male dog has ever penetrated another male dog to ejaculate.

So what is natural is one male with one female at a time, in the form of what you say is heterosexual sex, that is what is natural. All other forms are a deviant and are only practiced by humans. Animals do not practice it.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

But we are not Animals correct? "Male" Seahorses are the ones that give birth, there are Fishes that Change Sex Daily. so if you are basing ""Normal"" on what Animals do then Transgender and Multi-Gender is Normal

what about Infertile Men and Woman? they won't Reproduce "Naturally"

www.gaystarnews.com...

a reply to: YenSid

Are you seriously comparing your humanity to a seahorse, fish or frogs?

What differs us from base animals is our Conscience. No animal like a lion, a crocodile or a bear would think twice about killing you. Nor would, nor can they feel guilty about it after the fact is done.

Believe the myths of men or believe the word of God. But like I said God allows homosexuality.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

You compared us to Animals.

The direct quote

heterosexual relationships of animals of any class is natural. A male dogs humping another male dog never ends in ejaculation into the other male dog. the other male dog usually will nip or bite at the other stopping any penetration. Science has already observed that no male dog has ever penetrated another male dog to ejaculate.

So what is natural is one male with one female at a time, in the form of what you say is heterosexual sex, that is what is natural. All other forms are a deviant and are only practiced by humans. Animals do not practice it.

I was pointing out the fact that if you try and compare the Naturalness of Homosexuality, you can't cherry-pick

a reply to: YenSid

no I just showed how in the natural kingdom that heterosexual sex is natural and all others are not. even with sea horses you have a male and female, and with frogs and fish too.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

I guess you've never heard of dolphins having male to male sex? I even had a gay dog. It happens all over the animal kingdom.

a reply to: thyextendedself

Considering most life on this planet reproduces asexually, I'm not entirely sure why god would be homophobic either.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

And I'm saying that in the "Animal Kingdom" there is proven Animals that can Change their Sex, the "Male" sea Hore is responsible for Birth, so Gender-Roles are not "Females" Reproduce. I'm saying that by your Theory the Animal Kingdom proves the all of the GLBT+ community is as Natural as heterosexual Cisgender people

Its because his stuck in the closet and too scared to come out.

And his a jealous and wrathful god who is jealous of all the ones who have come out so he orders their death, which makes him feel better.

Coomba98

a reply to: YenSid

but they have no feeling of wanting their sex change nor do they have a conscience to change their sex in and of themselves.

Again I bring of the animal kingdom that shows heterosexual sex in natural through out the animal kingdom and physiologically mans is an animal with a conscience.

a reply to: TerryDon79

a dolphin nor a dog has ever ejaculated into another male. It is a proven scientific fact of observation. they go through motions but are never said to penetrate the makes of both turn and bite.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

That's utter rubbish. Male dolphins insert their penis into another male dolphins blowhole. And yes, they do ejaculate.

Male dogs also penetrate male dogs and ejaculate.

Just because you don't think they do, doesn't change the fact that they do.

Also, what about clown fish? They change sex depending on what's needed. If the make to female ratio is too high, a male can change to a female. If the female to male ratio is too high, the female can change to a male.

Then there's sea horses. The male has a pouch that the female deposits eggs into. The male then fertilises the eggs, while in the pouch, and carries them until they're fully developed.

And you've also got a sexual animals. Certain reptile and armadillo females can reproduce without a male being present.

Lastly, you've got something called heterogamy in aphids. That's the ability to change from needing a male and female to being a sexual and back again.

So, maybe you want to rethink what you said.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

Yup many gay animals I used to know a gay British Bulldog only jumped on the fella dogs was right happy also.
Penguins.
Giraffes. Gay sex accounts for 94% of all observed sexual activity in giraffes....(did not know that).
Vampire bats and many many more.

a reply to: TheKnightofDoom

you forget that none of the giraffes ejaculated inside another male.