Email shows federal immigration bosses in OT push to swear in new citizens 'due to election'

And then there is this...

An internal Obama administration email shows immigration officials may be literally working overtime to swear in as many new “citizen voters” as possible before the Nov. 8 presidential election, a powerful lawmaker charged Thursday.

The email, from a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services field office chief and part of a chain of correspondence within the agency, urges the unnamed recipient to swear in as many citizens as possible “due to the election year.”

“The Field Office due to the election year needs to process as many of their N-400 cases as possible between now and FY 2016,” reads the email, which was disclosed to FoxNews.com by Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., who chairs the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

“If you have cases in this category or other pending, you are encouraged to take advantage of the OT if you can,” the email continues. “This will be an opportunity to move your pending naturalization cases. If you have not volunteered for OT, please consider and let me know if you are interested.”

That seems almost worse than the whole IRS targeting fiasco which seems like it is sputtering out to me. Trump better start working for the immigrant vote, although they'll probably be going to mostly blue states anyway.

If they try to get them to swing the election then I am officially done trying to have faith in my country.

ETA: Source and I have way too much forced computer time during the end of the fiscal year...

Plz link

Are you familiar with whole fiasco surrounding the Alien and Sedition Acts?

Adams signed them into law in 1798. It was a multi-pronged effort by Adams and the Federalists to thwart support for Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican Party.

Along with being used to prosecute newspaper editors and writers who supported Jefferson, the acts increased the residency requirement for immigrants seeking citizenship from 5 to 14 years because Jefferson had strong support among immigrants.

There's nothing ethically wrong with expediting the swearing in of new citizens in time to vote. These are after all people who are becoming citizens of the United States, not illegal immigrants. They're not asking people who they intend to vote for and pushing them to the front of the line are they?

By GOP arguments, the SCOTUS vacancy shouldn't be filled until after the election because it's somehow claimed to be better for representative democracy that way. Shouldn't as many people who are becoming citizens be afforded a similar opportunity to have their wills represented for the next four years rather than finishing the process just after the election?

a reply to: theantediluvian

Except the ones who get accidentally made citizens.

looks like a way to disenfranchise citizens who won`t vote for the Democrat regime.Sort of sounds like treason to me when you import people just in time to null your opponets legal votes.But I put nothing beyond the George Soros party.

Anyone remember, there was a thread here about registering voters in Nevada, some girl was caught doing the hanky panky with out of state Ca plates.

a reply to: bonsaihorn

I can't believe the underhanded BS going on,and no one doing there job,all I hear is whining of criminal's caught with hand in cookie jar,now underhanded way of bringing in possible terrorist cells,so elect Hillary,disregard the killers

a reply to: theantediluvian

They're not asking people who they intend to vote for and pushing them to the front of the line are they?

I don't have a link... but... I swear I've seen videos of (illegal) immigrants being granted expedited citizenship in order to vote for... wait for it....

wait for it...





Hillary.

Like they actually said to camera crews while they were standing in line that they are getting their citizenship in order to vote against Donald Trump.

The voter registration teams know this. They are all shills for the Hill camp.

You know...when I went to work I found out I had to have five years in the company to be 100% vested in pension plans, 401(k), etc. Six months of vacation accrual to actually be eligible to TAKE a vacation day.

I suggest we require new immigrants be 100% vested in the United States before they can begin receiving citizenship benefits.

Like, you must live in the United States for five years, be employed full-time during that period, pay taxes...in order to be able to vote or receive any "entitlement" benefits.

I mean......it's only fair.....

a reply to: Jansy

I suggest we require new immigrants be 100% vested in the United States before they can begin receiving citizenship benefits.

I think it would be reasonable to require anyone wishing to vote in the Presidential Primaries and or General Election to have resided in the US legally for at least one year.

All those who oppose state their reasons.

Labour did the very same thing in the UK, hence why pockets of Great Britain are now a total multi cultural soup, esp London which now has very few nationals that reside there. It was all to further their own agenda.

www.dailymail.co.uk...


We now have a nation with a massive identity crisis and all the social issues that come with a totally different belief system and sense of moral value.

The US is about 15 years behind Europe in mass migration, you have a high number Mexicans but with the current agenda you will see a increase in migrants from the Middle east and east African countries. Once the flood gates are opened its curtains for the native population as the birth rates will be totally off the charts.

A new flag would be a good idea and possibly a name change to the,

Democratic Untited states of Ameristan...


Why we allow this is beyond me, these mass migration policies do not even bring in what is considered high skilled workers they tend to bring in totally unskilled migrants and their families, you can then only guess how much social help they need with finances and housing, it is a shore fire way of totally f#cking up a once great country..


RA

a reply to: bonsaihorn

It's a safe bet that the people being pushed through are NOT the ones who have waited the longest, and are all of the sort that we don't actually want as citizens; radicals from other places, with no respect for the country.

Since there is no guarantee that these new citizens will vote Democrat, I can't see how swearing them in before the election will benefit Clinton.

a reply to: theantediluvian

So let me get this straight.

Telling people to work overtime to get as many new people to vote before the election is perfectly ok. Even though we know that there is a great chance they will vote Democrat, it doesn't matter because we don't know for sure.

But having laws that people must provide ID to vote is racist, because the Democrats know people that vote Democrat are less likely to have ID's.

a reply to: theantediluvian

There's nothing ethically wrong with expediting the swearing in of new citizens in time to vote.

Are you serious? Yes is absolutely IS unethical to expedite the process. They don't care about the individual becoming a citizen for the individual's own benefit, they care about their vote. They don't have to ask who they are voting for because they already know from statistical history.

Not to mention the extreme slap in the face to those that endured the rather lengthy process to citizenship.

Wow, just wow.

a reply to: Grambler

But having laws that people must provide ID to vote is racist, because the Democrats know people that vote Democrat are less likely to have ID's.

Is that a fact?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grambler

But having laws that people must provide ID to vote is racist, because the Democrats know people that vote Democrat are less likely to have ID's.

Is that a fact?

No, but it is the belief of many people in the Democratic party.