Can we still trust what they put into vaccines?

a reply to: galien8

Absolutely not!

In my humble opinion, the fact that the authorities knowingly spread a transgenerational cancer causing virus through the polio vaccine for over 30 years means that there truly is not anything they would not put into vaccines. IT is called SV40.

A cancer causing monkey virus from FDA approved vaccines

After SV40 was originally detected in the Salk and Sabin vaccines that had been administered to millions of children around the world, the scientific community held its breath and wondered if these children would be stricken with cancer.[61] Indeed, the pediatric cancer rate continued to climb through the 1960’s, 70’s, 80’s and 90’s.[62] But, the few epidemiological studies that looked for a direct link between SV40 and human cancer provided inconsistent conclusions. Some reports found that there was an increased risk of cancer from SV40 exposure[63] and others found that there was no risk.[64] Each of these studies suffered from major flaws including the fact that no one knew who actually received the SV40-contaminated vaccines and who did not, so it was impossible to compare an SV40-exposed group with a non-exposed group.[65]

By 1999, numerous pathologists, microbiologists, and virologists throughout the world had detected SV40 in a variety of human cancers such as brain tumors[66] including medulloblastomas,[67] bone cancers,[68] and mesotheliomas[69] a fatal lung cancer. These were the very same cancers that were created when SV40 was introduced into animals.[70] The advent of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology that could identify the genetic code of specific strands of DNA demonstrated with precision that it was this monkey virus that was being detected in human cancers and no other.[71] Moreover, the rates of these particular cancers had steadily increased over the last few decades.[72] The question that had been left unanswered for almost four decades now faced scientists again—was SV40 responsible for causing or contributing to human cancers?

Over the last forty years since its discovery, SV40 had become one of the most widely studied and best understood viruses in microbiology.[73] It was routinely used to create human cancers in the laboratory in order to test cancer therapies.[74] In addition, it is now known how this virus caused cancer on a molecular level. After careful study documented in peer reviewed publications, leaders in SV40 research announced that SV40 was a class 2A human carcinogen.[75]

originally posted by: neutronflux

Newly developed vaccines should not be required by law. Maybe only after ten years of voluntary use. Or in the case of an extreme breakout.

Never should it be required by law, because than they could force vaccines with sterilizing hormones upon the people with the argument that not vaccinated people will infect other people and helps spreading the virus

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Gothmog

Like what specifically and when does it become harmful and it what doses backed by what studies?

Look and you shall be enlightened. Seek and ye shall find. Plenty. Oh great searcher of knowledge.

Thought so, you are just parroting something you heard but can't back up your own claim.

originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: galien8

Absolutely not!

In my humble opinion, the fact that the authorities knowingly spread a transgenerational cancer causing virus through the polio vaccine for over 30 years means that there truly is not anything they would not put into vaccines. IT is called SV40.

I this done with an intend? (maliciously determined to cause harm)

originally posted by: galien8

originally posted by: neutronflux

Newly developed vaccines should not be required by law. Maybe only after ten years of voluntary use. Or in the case of an extreme breakout.

Never should it be required by law, because than they could force vaccines with sterilizing hormones upon the people with the argument that not vaccinated people will infect other people and helps spreading the virus

I agree with you, but I do believe in a little compromise too. It is also good to walk a bit towards a person's counter argument in these threads of social issues. It will reveal how authoritative they might be, or trollish.

a reply to: galien8

They knew that it was in the vaccines and continued to use them.

I would venture to say that it was compartmentalized information and that only a few were aware of what was going on and that would be the same exact way they could be using vaccines as a method of causin ill health.

So I absolutely think that it was done with intent from the people at the top, just as they could spread mass sterilaztion through vaccine or set the stage for chronic auto immune diseases like we see spreading like wild fire throughout the population, that you know "they just can not seem to figure out"!

originally posted by: MongolianPaellaFish

originally posted by: flatbush71
Anyway, you tell me if the stuff is safe.

It's safe.

Here's the definitive answer!!!

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: MongolianPaellaFish

originally posted by: flatbush71
Anyway, you tell me if the stuff is safe.

It's safe.

Here's the definitive answer!!!

Now that is funny Well done for your photoshop

originally posted by: neutronflux

I agree with you, but I do believe in a little compromise too. It is also good to walk a bit towards a person's counter argument in these threads of social issues. It will reveal how authoritative they might be, or trollish.

Good thinking: The Compromise!

I have been called a trol on occasion, but if the Kenyan Affair is true, I cannot compromise on the 10 Commandments though, although for me ...an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth... comes first, I would only kill out of defense, but never lie to people I don't know lets say strangers, can become friends, still would not lie, only if they betray me, I would lie back out of defense

originally posted by: elementalgrove

So I absolutely think that it was done with intent from the people at the top, just as they could spread mass sterilaztion through vaccine...

So it was a kind of profit maximization? That should never be done by playing with other peoples lives, thats real evil, if that is a normal mentality to get rich, I rather stay poor "living in the world of the common people ... "

a reply to: galien8

Now you are just coming over as all persons involved in vaccination development are greedy.

It's a two way street. Would you rather have complicity of a government department like the EPA that botched up the health issues of WTC dust, water supply in Colorado, or the water supply in Michigan?

You do better if you give people a little grace and are willing to work towards a real solution.

originally posted by: Sremmos80

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Gothmog

Like what specifically and when does it become harmful and it what doses backed by what studies?

Look and you shall be enlightened. Seek and ye shall find. Plenty. Oh great searcher of knowledge.

Thought so, you are just parroting something you heard but can't back up your own claim.

No. Just reminding that the best lessons are the ones a person learns on his own.
Now , enough banter,
Thank you for playin the game , but you are all outta tokens

originally posted by: neutronflux

You do better if you give people a little grace and are willing to work towards a real solution.

Correct! Thats why I keep saying to you lets have a public UN Internal Affairs Tribunal in The Hague with lots of live TV footage and media coverage about the alleged mass sterilizations of millions of Kenyan women of fertile age by WHO tetanus vaccinations, so we can restore trust again in vaccines and the Pharmaceutical Industry, if vaccines can be tampered with than also all the other chemical and biotechnological medication.

...release your anger and together we can bring back order in the galaxy...

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: MongolianPaellaFish

originally posted by: flatbush71
Anyway, you tell me if the stuff is safe.

It's safe.

Here's the definitive answer!!!

Well, shoot. We all know what happened to him!

a reply to: galien8

I thought the new Testament was more about being the hands of God, helping the victims, realizing you may have to divorce yourself from society, and being a disciple of Christ by standing up for what is right may lead to prosecution.

Who does vengeance belong too?

originally posted by: MongolianPaellaFish

Female Fertility 95% decrease

originally posted by: galien8
Female Fertility 95% decrease

Nonsense.

It is always about risk. The risk of something happening to you from a vaccine very very small the risk of getting certain diseases without vaccinated a lot higher in my book.
The facts are a populace vaccinated is more safer then one that is not.

originally posted by: galien8

Yes there is a little mercury salt added among other chemicals for stability and shelf live

There is no mercury salt in vaccines at all.

originally posted by: galien8

Female Fertility 95% decrease

Absolutely not true:

Kenya: tests show no sterilization agent in tetanus vaccine

Birth rate in Keny is still as high as it was in 2000: LINK

And regarding polio vaccine and SV40: first of all it never caused cancer. Second, polio vaccines have been SV40 free since 1963.