Debate Rules Being Set by Hillary Donors

Shenanigans uncovered inside the Commission on Presidential Debates.

Looks like some members in control of the debates are donors to guess who?

Yup, Hillary.

And seems nobody donated to Trump or Stein or Johnson.

It's shocking what people get away with.


Debate Rules Being Set by Hillary Donors

Campaign contributions from 'bipartisan' debate commissioners given exclusively to Clinton

The men and women who run the supposedly “nonpartisan” Commission on Presidential Debates have put their money where their mouths are — and it all has gone to Democrat Hillary Clinton.

The amount of money is small by the standards of a modern presidential campaign, but it is one-sided. A pair of Ph.D. candidates at Stanford University examined campaign finance reports and found that all of the $5,650 in contributions that commission members have made to presidential candidates during this election season have gone to Clinton.

It's Rigged !!

It's all bought off !!

An AHA MOMENT!

This proves it's been rigged all along. This is the same outfit that has effectively BANNED "third parties" from getting into debates and therefore having a snowballs chance on the sun of getting any recognition (well that and how the 2 Party System crony Criminal Media mostly acts like they don't exist).

Yet more evidence Trump really might be a bonafide outsider.

Note that this year the third party candidates have been getting record coverage by the look of it, and that you can thank for The Donald shaking up the GOP Crony Establishment (as well as the DNC also eating its own tail in trying to stop him).

Love him or hate him he's the best thing that's ever happened to shake up the demonic 2 Party System and pave a path that actual alternatives our in our future.

a reply to: xuenchen

In other words Trump is setting up the narrative so that he can avoid the debates without looking like the coward he is.

If the same rules apply to both of them, how is it "rigged?"

Doesn't matter, right? Don't even have to see the rules. It's rigged.

Interesting how the "rigged" system got Trump elected as the Republican nominee. The foot stamping and sniveling is wearing thin.

"They're cheating mommy!"

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: xuenchen

In other words Trump is setting up the narrative so that he can avoid the debates without looking like the coward he is.

And the STRETCH Award for Sep, 18 2016 goes to Kali74!

got a real source, instead of some alt-right BS blog?

a reply to: xuenchen

It doesn't matter.

They can sculpt the questions anyway they want.

Hillary still has to answer them.

a reply to: Phage

The Big Story isn't how these particular debates may or may not be handled. The Big Story is how the Commission on Presidential Debates is one of numerous rigging / Electioneering mechanisms to ensure 'only' Ruling Establishment insiders have any real shot at any POTUS bid, and now for the first time (that I know of) we have quantitative evidence that the CPD are Establishment stooges.

It's why it was setup to begin with (collusion between the "Republican's" & "Democrat's").

An independent can’t be President; here’s the real reason why
The Democratic and Republican parties, with full malice and intent, have acted to create a rigged duopoly. Neither wants a third challenger, and both have actively colluded to prevent one from ever having a chance. The parties instinctively understand that their key to political power lies in making sure that the choice is between the lesser of two evils. One way is by making it nearly impossible for third-party candidates to compete for donations on a level playing field. Right after the 2014 midterms, the leaders of the Democratic and Republican parties in Congress met in secret and then changed the law so that individual donors giving to the two major party candidates could donate $834,000 per year in total contributions through their parties while those giving to independents were limited to just $2,700.

There are obstacles, too, at the state level. While Democratic and Republican parties are automatically put on the ballot, independents face different hurdles in all 50 states, including filing deadlines that are far too early, differing signature requirements, and other onerous regulations that make it difficult and costly to get on the ballot.

Then, there are the obstacles placed by the Federal Election Commission (FEC), which was established in the wake of Watergate to oversee the conduct of federal campaigns. That FEC has become the most notorious, ineffective, inefficient and corrupt of all federal agencies. It is composed of three super-partisan members – often undisputable political hacks – from each of the two major parties. Because every vote is potentially a tie, each side is able to stymie any meaningful enforcement or regulation of the electoral system and to protect its side from any tough political sanctions. In most cases, the two parties collude to protect the duopoly. The chance that a challenge by an independent or third-party will be considered on the merits is about as favorable as the chance an African-American had of passing a literacy test in my native South when I was a child.

edit on 18-9-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The Big Story isn't how these particular debates may or may not be handled.

Really? Maybe you should tell that to the OP.

Are you seriously saying you are concerned about unfairness to Johnson?

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

You're right. I should have said his handlers were setting up the narrative.

a reply to: Phage

No! You tell him.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

He doesn't reply to me.
Hasn't for some time now. Maybe thinks I cheat?

a reply to: xuenchen

I am not surprised given the DNC rig job on Sanders.

This is just a show election.

a reply to: xuenchen

So the election can be bought for less than six thousand dollars?

Also the article says it's a non profit controlled by both parties. One guy donated to Hillary.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The third parties could mobilize between presidential elections and get candidates on major party tickets like the Tea Party.

Or mobilize after this election to build a strong party for the next election.

Screaming and kicking at the end of 4 years is not going to change things now.

The DNC has been proven to have rigged the system against their own player (BERNIE).

Why would anyone believe they aren't rigging the system against their actual opponents?

originally posted by: Phage
If the same rules apply to both of them, how is it "rigged?"

Doesn't matter, right? Don't even have to see the rules. It's rigged.

Interesting how the "rigged" system got Trump elected as the Republican nominee. The foot stamping and sniveling is wearing thin.

"They're cheating mommy!"

So, Are you still beating your kids?


Now do you see how picking the questions matters?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen

It doesn't matter.

They can sculpt the questions anyway they want.

Hillary still has to answer them.

Hillary will get far different questions than Trump will...So it DOES matter...

So we are going to see a heavily bias and slanted toward Hillary debate? Donald Trump is right once again. Its rigged. Its all rigged.

September 20, 2016

Hillary Clinton is spending 5 of the next 6 days off the campaign trail...preparing to debate Donald Trump this coming Monday. She's really giving him a lot of credit!

Story: www.cnn.com...

I heard Donald say to Bill O'Reilly 2 weeks ago that his debate preparation is "minimal". I wonder if Hillary's preparations include anything medically related?

Edit: Just came across this.. Word's getting around that Hillary is taking a few days off again. Trump responds..

www.politico.com...