It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Annee
Funny they shared alot of the same donors and not much has changed as promised. Home or abroad. I disliked both just to put it out there. And Hillary seems as she will be a as heavy handed in foreign affairs.
Kristol and Kagan advocated regime change in Iraq throughout the Iraq disarmament crisis. Following perceived Iraqi unwillingness to co-operate with UN weapons inspections, core members of the PNAC including Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, R. James Woolsey, Elliot Abrams, Donald Rumsfeld, Robert Zoellick, and John Bolton were among the signatories of an open letter initiated by the PNAC to President Bill Clinton calling for the removal of Saddam Hussein. Portraying Saddam Hussein as a threat to the United States, its Middle East allies, and oil resources in the region, and emphasizing the potential danger of any Weapons of Mass Destruction under Iraq's control, the letter asserted that the United States could "no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections." Stating that American policy "cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council," the letter's signatories asserted that "the U.S. has the authority under existing UN resolutions to take the necessary steps, including military steps, to protect our vital interests in the Gulf." Believing that UN sanctions against Iraq would be an ineffective means of disarming Iraq, PNAC members also wrote a letter to Republican members of the U.S. Congress Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott, urging Congress to act, and supported the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 which President Clinton signed into law in October 1998. In February 1998, some of the same individuals who had signed the PNAC letter in January also signed a similar letter to Clinton, from the bipartisan Committee for Peace and Security in the Gulf. In January 1999, the PNAC circulated a memo that criticized the December 1998 bombing of Iraq in Operation Desert Fox as ineffective. The memo questioned the viability of Iraqi democratic opposition, which the U.S. was supporting through the Iraq Liberation Act, and referred to any "containment" policy as an illusion. Shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the PNAC sent a letter to President George W. Bush, advocating "a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq", or regime change. The letter suggested that "any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq," even if no evidence surfaced linking Iraq to the September 11 attacks. The letter warned that allowing Hussein to remain in power would be "an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism."] From 2001 through the invasion of Iraq, the PNAC and many of its members voiced active support for military action against Iraq, and asserted leaving Saddam Hussein in power would be "surrender to terrorism." en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Annee
What are you implying with that article.
originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: kruphix
Yea tax payers should foot the bill when the country has all that oil wealth. You cant be serious. Lets stop being fools. We liberate your country and you will help with the bill.
originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: intrepid
Its called the real world. Are we boy scouts, world cops what? Joe Taxpayer paying for it thats ok with you then? Not even a lesser of two evil or some thing?
originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: kruphix
Yea tax payers should foot the bill when the country has all that oil wealth. You cant be serious. Lets stop being fools. We liberate your country and you will help with the bill.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: kruphix
Yea tax payers should foot the bill when the country has all that oil wealth. You cant be serious. Lets stop being fools. We liberate your country and you will help with the bill.
The US wasn't asked to. In fact the UN said NO. So why should they foot the bill for something that was thrust on them? Sounds like piracy to me.