It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The U.S. State Department announced the government had agreed to pay Iran $1.7 billion to settle a case related to the sale of military equipment prior to the Iranian revolution, according to a statement issued on Sunday.
Iran had set up a $400 million trust fund for such purchases, which was frozen along with diplomatic relations in 1979. In settling the claim, which had been tied up at the Hague Tribunal since 1981, the U.S. is returning the money in the fund along with "a roughly $1.3 billion compromise on the interest," the statement said.
originally posted by: stinkelbaum
a reply to: facedye
Have you actually read what the court case was about? If so, please enlighten me, because it's the most complicated and (seemingly purposely) convoluted court case summary I've read in a while:
weak come back, you got shot down then, blame your own understanding for spouting lies.
originally posted by: facedye
originally posted by: stinkelbaum
a reply to: facedye
Have you actually read what the court case was about? If so, please enlighten me, because it's the most complicated and (seemingly purposely) convoluted court case summary I've read in a while:
weak come back, you got shot down then, blame your own understanding for spouting lies.
I'm sorry, what?
I was genuinely asking Hazardous to fill me in, in hopes that he can clarify a situation that is extremely muddy when you look closely at the details.
Shot down? Weak comeback? We're talking about a transfer of ~2 billion dollars to a state that *openly sponsors* terrorism. You really think I'm devaluing the importance of this thread in order to sharpen my debating skills?
...Seriously did you even read the articles and subsequent points I posted? or did you stop exactly where you quoted me because you had, what you thought, was ample reason to call me a liar?
What am I lying about, exactly?
originally posted by: Christosterone
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: Christosterone
I understand the ramifications that Iran now has a big load of money to play with, but did it really affect our economy at all?
I am the op and NEVER mentioned the effect this payout would have on the US economy...because that is an obtuse thought process on par with an elementary schooler's understanding of the political world(no pun intended)
Also, I would love to hear the "ramifications" since you "understand" them....do tell
-Chris
originally posted by: facedye
a reply to: Christosterone
In reading the comments there, something struck me.
We didn't pay this ransom for no reason.
I obviously have no way of validating this, but the US wouldn't give up 1.7 bill to a state we're actively having escalated aggressions with to free a few hostages.
They know something, and the US doesn't want it to be public knowledge. This is not a ransom paid for hostages, rather for incriminating and destabilizing information.