Why are feminists voting for Hillary ?

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Gryphon66
The party of family values is damning Hillary Clinton for honoring her marriage and defending her family.

I'd say something about irony ... but it'd be redundant.

Some call it victim-blaming.

"Some" or you?

Own your words.

Blaming the victim is victim-blaming by definition.

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

"Look at her face, ugh, do you really want that to be POTUS" - Donald J Trump

Feminists unite, TRUMP 2016. Lulz.

Correct.
Why would they choose a more intelligent choice like Jill Stein?

Jill Stein?

An admirable vote, but personally, is she even ready for such a big job?

She'd be better off in congress.

And a woman that is too stupid to enter a password to access her email is ready to be our President?
Ok.

And the guy who is stupid enough to ask why we don't use nukes is ready to be your President?


We could do this all day.

You are the one jumping to the conclusion that I want Trump to be our President when I am on the record as saying that I don't.

a reply to: AboveBoard

You didn't address the one about Hillary defending the honor of her serial rapist husband.

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

"Look at her face, ugh, do you really want that to be POTUS" - Donald J Trump

Feminists unite, TRUMP 2016. Lulz.

Correct.
Why would they choose a more intelligent choice like Jill Stein?

Jill Stein?

An admirable vote, but personally, is she even ready for such a big job?

She'd be better off in congress.

And a woman that is too stupid to enter a password to access her email is ready to be our President?
Ok.

And the guy who is stupid enough to ask why we don't use nukes is ready to be your President?


We could do this all day.

You are the one jumping to the conclusion that I want Trump to be our President when I am on the record as saying that I don't.

And you jumped to the conclusion that I want Hillary to win.

So we both did ourselves a disservice.

ATTENTION!!!!

This is the topic

Why are feminists voting for Hillary ?

Please discuss the topic....and not other members and not other facets of the campaigns.
You are responsible for your own posts.
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

"Look at her face, ugh, do you really want that to be POTUS" - Donald J Trump

Feminists unite, TRUMP 2016. Lulz.

Correct.
Why would they choose a more intelligent choice like Jill Stein?

Jill Stein?

An admirable vote, but personally, is she even ready for such a big job?

She'd be better off in congress.

And a woman that is too stupid to enter a password to access her email is ready to be our President?
Ok.

And the guy who is stupid enough to ask why we don't use nukes is ready to be your President?


We could do this all day.

You are the one jumping to the conclusion that I want Trump to be our President when I am on the record as saying that I don't.

And you jumped to the conclusion that I want Hillary to win.

So we both did ourselves a disservice.

Why not post the better alternative for feminists in your first or second post in the thread?
Like I did.
Instead of just bashing Trump?

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

"Look at her face, ugh, do you really want that to be POTUS" - Donald J Trump

Feminists unite, TRUMP 2016. Lulz.

Correct.
Why would they choose a more intelligent choice like Jill Stein?

Jill Stein?

An admirable vote, but personally, is she even ready for such a big job?

She'd be better off in congress.

And a woman that is too stupid to enter a password to access her email is ready to be our President?
Ok.

And the guy who is stupid enough to ask why we don't use nukes is ready to be your President?


We could do this all day.

You are the one jumping to the conclusion that I want Trump to be our President when I am on the record as saying that I don't.

And you jumped to the conclusion that I want Hillary to win.

So we both did ourselves a disservice.

Why not post the better alternative for feminists in your first or second post in the thread?
Like I did.
Instead of just bashing Trump?

This thread is blatant Trump proselytising.

It's a valid comparison and people deserve to know the truth.

How many times you told people not to bring up Clinton in Trump threads?

I'll guess not once.

I realize that this thread was created as yet another Hillary-bashing thread ... but the fundamental question at stake here is still a good question ... why would self-described feminists vote for Hillary Clinton?

Here's a few feminists in their own words ...

Hillary Clinton has Won my Millenial Feminist Vote

Hillary Clinton Is the Most Qualified Candidate, but the Fact That She's a Woman Matters Too

Hard Choices - I Used to Hate Hillary Now I'm Voting For Her

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

"Look at her face, ugh, do you really want that to be POTUS" - Donald J Trump

Feminists unite, TRUMP 2016. Lulz.

Correct.
Why would they choose a more intelligent choice like Jill Stein?

Jill Stein?

An admirable vote, but personally, is she even ready for such a big job?

She'd be better off in congress.

And a woman that is too stupid to enter a password to access her email is ready to be our President?
Ok.

And the guy who is stupid enough to ask why we don't use nukes is ready to be your President?


We could do this all day.

You are the one jumping to the conclusion that I want Trump to be our President when I am on the record as saying that I don't.

And you jumped to the conclusion that I want Hillary to win.

So we both did ourselves a disservice.

Why not post the better alternative for feminists in your first or second post in the thread?
Like I did.
Instead of just bashing Trump?

This thread is blatant Trump proselytising.

It's a valid comparison and people deserve to know the truth.

How many times you told people not to bring up Clinton in Trump threads?

I'll guess not once.

I never understood the whole "you can't bring up Clinton" remark so prevalent around here, especially when comparing the candidates is a necessary part of the voting process.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

"Look at her face, ugh, do you really want that to be POTUS" - Donald J Trump

Feminists unite, TRUMP 2016. Lulz.

Correct.
Why would they choose a more intelligent choice like Jill Stein?

Jill Stein?

An admirable vote, but personally, is she even ready for such a big job?

She'd be better off in congress.

And a woman that is too stupid to enter a password to access her email is ready to be our President?
Ok.

And the guy who is stupid enough to ask why we don't use nukes is ready to be your President?


We could do this all day.

You are the one jumping to the conclusion that I want Trump to be our President when I am on the record as saying that I don't.

And you jumped to the conclusion that I want Hillary to win.

So we both did ourselves a disservice.

Why not post the better alternative for feminists in your first or second post in the thread?
Like I did.
Instead of just bashing Trump?

This thread is blatant Trump proselytising.

It's a valid comparison and people deserve to know the truth.

How many times you told people not to bring up Clinton in Trump threads?

I'll guess not once.

I never understood the whole "you can't bring up Clinton" remark so prevalent around here, especially when comparing the candidates is a necessary part of the voting process.

It's people's prerogative if they want to bring up Clinton in Trump threads.

Just don't complain when people bring up Trump in Clinton threads.

That's all I've been saying.

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

"Look at her face, ugh, do you really want that to be POTUS" - Donald J Trump

Feminists unite, TRUMP 2016. Lulz.

Correct.
Why would they choose a more intelligent choice like Jill Stein?

Jill Stein?

An admirable vote, but personally, is she even ready for such a big job?

She'd be better off in congress.

And a woman that is too stupid to enter a password to access her email is ready to be our President?
Ok.

And the guy who is stupid enough to ask why we don't use nukes is ready to be your President?


We could do this all day.

You are the one jumping to the conclusion that I want Trump to be our President when I am on the record as saying that I don't.

And you jumped to the conclusion that I want Hillary to win.

So we both did ourselves a disservice.

Why not post the better alternative for feminists in your first or second post in the thread?
Like I did.
Instead of just bashing Trump?

This thread is blatant Trump proselytising.

It's a valid comparison and people deserve to know the truth.

How many times you told people not to bring up Clinton in Trump threads?

I'll guess not once.

Can you name an alternative for feminists to vote for instead of Hillary?
If you, as you seemed to intimate, don't support Hillary.

a reply to: Gryphon66

One of them is voting for Hilary because she is a woman. Good god what has this world come to...

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Gryphon66

One of them is voting for Hilary because she is a woman. Good god what has this world come to...

That was my earlier point.
Apparently, Jill Stein is not a woman... in that feminist's eyes.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Gryphon66

One of them is voting for Hilary because she is a woman. Good god what has this world come to...

You are incensed that a feminist would vote for a woman?

Why?

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Gryphon66

One of them is voting for Hilary because she is a woman. Good god what has this world come to...

That was my earlier point.
Apparently, Jill Stein is not a woman... in that feminist's eyes.

No reason to think that ... did you read the article?

All three have noted their MULTIPLE reasons for voting for HIllary Clinton, none of which are merely her sex.

a reply to: Gryphon66

I'm not incensed because she is voting for a woman, but that she is voting for Hilary because she is a woman, and for no other reason. That's called sexism.

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

"Look at her face, ugh, do you really want that to be POTUS" - Donald J Trump

Feminists unite, TRUMP 2016. Lulz.

Correct.
Why would they choose a more intelligent choice like Jill Stein?

Jill Stein?

An admirable vote, but personally, is she even ready for such a big job?

She'd be better off in congress.

And a woman that is too stupid to enter a password to access her email is ready to be our President?
Ok.

And the guy who is stupid enough to ask why we don't use nukes is ready to be your President?


We could do this all day.

You are the one jumping to the conclusion that I want Trump to be our President when I am on the record as saying that I don't.

And you jumped to the conclusion that I want Hillary to win.

So we both did ourselves a disservice.

Why not post the better alternative for feminists in your first or second post in the thread?
Like I did.
Instead of just bashing Trump?

This thread is blatant Trump proselytising.

It's a valid comparison and people deserve to know the truth.

How many times you told people not to bring up Clinton in Trump threads?

I'll guess not once.

Can you name an alternative for feminists to vote for instead of Hillary?
If you, as you seemed to intimate, don't support Hillary.

Not during this election I can't.
I would have said Bernie.

Or Bush/Paul maybe.

But none of them stood a chance.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Gryphon66

I'm not incensed because she is voting for a woman, but that she is voting for Hilary because she is a woman, and for no other reason. That's called sexism.

Which article are you referring to?

None of the folks linked list Clinton's sex at their only deciding factor.

I can see how you might think that if you only reviewed the article titles.

a reply to: Gryphon66

The Cosmo article.

It has taken nearly 170 years for the liberal feminist project to have a woman as major party presidential candidate. This is telling. So for those of us who are radical feminists, those of us who want to see the total transformation of oppressive social structures, this is a reminder that if it has taken this long for the liberal feminist project to reach such a milestone, our radical feminist dreams will take longer. But it is also a reminder that if feminist movements can't even elect a woman president, then we haven't moved the needle nearly enough on patriarchy.

Those feminists who act like this is possible are not being honest about what the structural transformation of systems looks like.

To me, it looks, in part, like electing a woman president.

Well as my brother-in-law said the other day: "We (as a nation) are voting for Hillary's vagina instead of voting for a candidate."